Bruce Springsteen
has a new set of political lies that he can't back
up with proof.
That
sounds a bit unpatriotic
to me.
I'd
like to start off by saying that I think Bruce Springsteen is one of the
greatest Rock artists of all time. His music is brilliant, and he
is a magnificent performer. I
have been one of his biggest fans for over 30 years.
A few years ago,
before the 2004 Presidential election, Bruce
Springsteen made some very unsettling political
comments. Because of his outright political lies (not opinions) I
wrote a web page about him:
Now it's 2007
and Bruce has
a new album, it's a new political season, and Bruce
has a new set of lies.
I want to first
start off by saying that Bruce Springsteen
has every right to express his opinion. I would never
want to take that right away from him, or any other American, EVER.
But if Bruce
is going to spew lies, without evidence, I'm going to call him on it.
I'm NOT
writing this web page because I disagree with him, I'm writing it because
he's spreading lies that he cannot prove.
Bruce
has a new album out called "Magic".
It's a pretty good record overall even if some of the lyrics are a bit
misguided.
But I'd like to
ask Bruce why
did he choose the photo on the cover of this album that makes him look
like a criminal in a police mug shot?
With all the great
concert photos of him why is he using picture that makes him look like
Nick
Nolte after a DUI or a drug bust? And why doesn't
he ever put his great E Street Band
on his album covers with him? You've sure got a guilty look there
Bruce.
Bruce Springsteen
is suffering from a disease called "Bush Derangement
Syndrome" where people spread and believe
lies about President Bush
simply because they hate him so much.
People who have
this disease start with the template that they hate George
Bush first, and then fit in all their false
"facts" after that. It seems to me that is exactly what Bruce
Springsteen is doing.
Bruce is drinking
the Far Left Wing's, Koz and Move On Kool Aid. Spreading their viscous
lies that they can't back up with facts.
On September
28, 2007 Bruce
and the E Street Band
appeared on the "Today Show".
While their performance
wasn't too bad, I first have to say that Bruce
didn't look very good.
His hair was all
over the place, and he looked like he had just been released from jail
after a night in the drunk tank. I don't understand why he didn't
look a bit more polished.
He also looked
very unhappy and angry like he didn't want to be there very unlike his
Today Show performance of 2002.
He pretty much
begged people to buy his new album, maybe because his album sales are down
because many people don't like his current political lies.
During his performance
he made some very nasty, untrue political statements about President
Bush's Administration.
Rather than me
taking his comments out of context, you should take a look at exactly what
he said in this clip.
"Over the past
six years we've had to add to the American picture rendition, illegal wiretapping,
voter suppression, and no Habeas Corpus to the neglect of our great city
of New Orleans and her people. An attack on the Constitution, and the loss
of our best men and women in a tragic war."
On the 60 Minutes
television show Bruce Springsteen
again made some very harsh accusations against his country.
By the way Bruce,
we're not calling you unpatriotic because of your right to protest which
is perfectly valid. But we are saying you ARE
unpatriotic if you make these unfounded charges and refuse to offer up
any proof of them.
Bill O'Reilly
played Bruce's Today
Show comments and asked him to provide specific examples of the accusations
that he made.
O'Reilly
played asked the question is Bruce's
protests legitimate political dissent, or simply baseless accusations?
Bill O'Reilly
played Bruce's
comments from 60 Minutes,
and asked Bruce
some
very basic questions such as where is the proof?
Click
Here to see the Bill O'Reilly $25,000.00
charity challenge for Bruce Springsteen
to answer his accusations with proof. Actually all
O'Reilly
stipulated was that Springsteen
had to do was show up to get the charity money.
I do understand
that Bruce is
on tour and may not have time to visit O'Reilly,
but don't you think he could have set up a future interview?
Since Springsteen
would
not go in and offer ANY
proof
of his accusations O'Reilly
offered
up some new comments. Click
Here to see them.
Yes, Bruce,
when you bash America,
and make very serious accusations against your country, you have a RESPONSIBILITY
to back them up with proof!
You SHOULD
be able to offer this proof if you make these charges, and if you did so
you would gain back your respect, and send $25,000.00
to a well deserved charity.
Here Bruce
Springsteen VERY
rudely calls CNN reporter Soledad O'Brien
an IDIOT to her
face.
Ms. O'Brien
was simply asking what Bruce
thought about those who question musicians who take political stand.
She did not condemn
him for that, she simply asked him the question at which point Bruce
called her an IDIOT!
Bruce,
if you're going to make serious allegations, as a high profile person,
which is perfectly fine by me, you should be responsible enough to stand
up to questioning about them.
If you're not,
then SHUT UP AND SING!
This clip is important
in the fact that it shows you how uncomfortable Bruce
is in being questioned about his politics. He goes on to say that removing
President
Bush is simply common sense and not a political
point. RIGHT!
The stock market today is DOUBLE
where it was when Bill Clinton
was in office. So I guess it only makes sense to remove the man who
gave all Americans
who work tax cuts to help make that happen. Moron!
He mentions the
Presidents'
"circumstantial" evidence in a "rush" to war.
The evidence was
overwhelming that Saddam Hussien
either had or was compiling nuclear weaponry and that fact has been proven
true DESPITE
that most of the media has constantly tried to spin it the other way.
We also know he had chemical weapons as he had used them against his own
people.
The "rush" to
war took 12 years Bruce.
Where were you? That's the length of time Saddam
ignored the 17 UN sanctions against him. But I'm not going to go
over all these points again. I've discussed them all on my other page about
you, and people can read all about the evidence there:
Lets
go over all the new claims (lies) that
Bruce
Springsteen has made:
Rendition
and no Habeas Corpus?
Bruce Springsteen
says there has been Rendition
and no Habeas Corpus. Really?
To whom is he referring to?
Can he name a
single
AMERICAN CITIZEN
that has had his rights violated by being held in a jail without the due
process of law?
Or is he maybe
speaking of those non-military combatants, those TERRORISTS,
those non-Geneva Convention following thugs, those NON
AMERICANS, those women and child killing MURDERERS
caught
on the battlefields of Afghanistan
and Iraq?
I'm going to assume
that's who he meant until he explains himself further.
Those prisoners
are people who have declared war upon America
and are not following the rules of engagement as outlined by the Geneva
Convention.
They don't wear
uniforms, they don't represent any country's government and they are NOT
AMERICANS. Because of that,
we as AMERICANS
do NOT have to
afford them the luxury of Habeas Corpus.
But Liberals
like
Bruce Springsteen
want to offer these people who are actively killing our soldiers, and I
might add, innocent women and children, our AMERICAN
rights.
I'm sorry, I'm
one of the great AMERICANS
who do not believe these scum deserve ANY
of our rights because they are NOT Americans. They are simply
insane terrorists killing innocent people randomly. They are roaches,
they are snakes, and quite honestly in my opinion they should be not even
be held as prisoners, they should be killed on the battlefield in cold
blood.
The ONLY
value they hold for me, a great American,
is the intelligence value they may have to catch and kill even more of
these insane
MURDERERS.
For the record
President
Bush's suspension of Habeas
Corpus,
ONLY
for the FOREIGN PRISONERS captured
on battlefields outside of the United States,
was approved by Congress
through the Military Commissions Act.
So Bruce,
it's not President Bush's
suspension of Habeas Corpus,
it's CONGRESS
who approved this act.
The Military Commissions
Act of 2006, signed by President
Bush, that was approved by Congress,
including many Democrats,
stipulates that the right of habeas corpus should be denied ONLY
to ALIENS detained
by the United States,
and NOT United
States citizens.
Lawyers for the
FOREIGN
TERRORISTS captured on battlefields OUTSIDE
of the United States
brought their case to the United States Supreme Court In December 2007.
Supreme Court
Justice Antonin Scalia had just ONE
question for the lawyers which they could NOT
answer (just like you can't Bruce):
Justice Scalia
asked: "Do you have
a single case, in the 220 years of our country -- or, for that matter,
in the five centuries of the English Empire -- in which habeas was granted
to an alien in a territory that was not under the sovereign control of
either the United States or England?
In 220 years of
our history, or five centuries of the British, do you have a single case
in which it was not a citizen of England or a citizen of the United States
in which a common law writ of habeas corpus issued to a piece of land that
was not within the sovereign jurisdiction? You are appealing to a common
law right that somehow found its way into our Constitution without -- as
far as I can discern -- a single case, a writ ever issued to a non citizen."
So Bruce,
while you cry about our Constitution being
trampled on the simple fact is that it is the TERRORISTS
and their leftist lawyers who want to trample on it.
The same assertions
you made were brought to the Supreme Court,
the same way you presented them, WITH NO PROOF!!!
What about
these four men, ALL
convicted terrorists? ALL
of them got fair trials.
Jose Padilla
Richard Reid
Zacarias
Moussaoui
John Walker
Lindh
Jose Padilla
an illegal enemy combatant ant is a terrorist held here in the US and he
was given a fair trial by law. He was was found guilty of all charges against
him on August 16, 2007 by a federal jury, which found that he conspired
to kill people in an overseas Jihad and to fund and support overseas terrorism.
Richard Reid,
the convicted failed airplane shoe bomber, was given a fair trial by jury. Zacarias Moussaoui,
who is NOT an
American citizen, but was also given a fair trial and who was also convicted,
says that he and Reid
were meant to hijack the 5th plane on 9/11 and had intended to fly it into
the White House.
John Walker Lindh
got a plea bargain deal even though he conspired with Al
Quaeda and supplied his services to the Taliban.
That makes him a TRAITOR
who committed TREASON
against the United States
could have been put to death for his crimes.
All four of these
convicted terrorists, one of whom is not even an American citizen, were
given fair trials.
So what the heck
is Bruce Springsteen
taking about? He ought to explain
himself but he seems to have no interest in that, or offering up
any evidence to back up his claims.
In fact if anything
we are giving enemy combatants rights they do not deserve in the war on
terror.
Illegal
Wiretaps?
Bruce
is also claiming that President Bush
has authorized illegal wiretapping. Really? Then why is it
in the last six years that no charges have been brought against him for
doing so? Congress has
accused the President of these wiretaps but have produced no real evidence
against him. The wiretaps
that have happened are of people speaking to known
terrorists in other countries, NOT
between American
citizens here in the United States. And these wiretaps
were ALL known to the ranking members of Congress.
But speaking
of wiretaps, lets talk about the last administration.
It was Bill
Clinton who illegally used the Echelon
program in which he allowed the National Security
Administration to wiretap and spy on American
citizens all throughout the 1990's.
It was Bill
Clinton who had the NSA
monitor MILLIONS
of personal American
phone calls, e-mails, faxes, and ATM transactions inside the United
States - ALL WITHOUT A
COURT ORDER!
Mr.
Wiretap
It also seems
that Bill Clinton
used Echelon
not just to spy on potential terrorists. Evidence exists
that he actually used it for political purposes. Bill Clinton actually
used Echelon
wiretaps to spy for him and help him win the 1996 Presidential election!
The New
York Times said "ECHELON
is also being used for purposes well outside its original mission. The
regular discovery of domestic surveillance targeted at American civilians
for reasons of 'unpopular' political affiliations
or for no probable cause at all".
Is
that enough evidence for you Bruce? Where's
YOUR evidence?!!!
If you're going
to make allegations of illegal wiretaps you should not say they have been
going on for just the last six years.
Tell the people
the truth that
Bill Clinton
used them for 8 years to spy on Americans
for his own political purposes.
The National
Security Administration's documents PROVE
that Bill Clinton
had used Echelon to
spy on Americans
for his own political gain.
I might as well
mention the fact that Hillary Clinton
used illegal wiretaps as far back as 1993 to listen into conversations
of political opponents.
Meanwhile she
criticizes President Bush
that allow our intelligence agencies to listen in to conversations being
conducted by terrorists as they plot and plan to kill us. What a
Great
American she is!
Yep Bruce,
You're right on this one. There has been a LOT
of voter suppression.
DEMOCRATIC
lawyers successfully disqualified approximately 1,400 overseas absentee
ballots in Florida in the 2000 Presidential election. Many of the
targeted ballots were from military voters.
ACORN,
a left wing group that supports the Democratic
Party, committed the greatest voter fraud
EVER
in history.
ACORN
employees have been accused of, and have plead guilty to illegal elections
practices in Ohio, New Mexico, Florida, Colorado, Minnesota, Pennsylvania,
Wisconsin, and Virginia.
ACORN's employee's
freely admitted they forged voter registration forms. According to prosecutors,
ACORN
workers admitted filling out registration forms with names they found in
phone books last October (2004).
Read the ACORN
settlement HERE
where they ADMIT
their guilt.
The Liberal New
York Times stated that "A five month study
for the Democratic National Committee found that more than one in four
Ohio voters experienced problems at the polls last fall, but the study
did
NOT find
evidence of widespread election fraud that might have contributed to President
Bush's narrow victory there."
In
2006, four employees of the DemocraticJohn
Kerry Presidential campaign, the sons of a
first term congresswoman, Democratic Representative
Gwen Moore, and Milwaukee's former acting
mayor, Democrat
Marvin
Pratt, were among five Democratic
activists convicted of the crime of slashing the tires of 27 vehicles rented
by Republicans
to drive voters and monitor to the polls on Election Day.
It's also interesting
to note that most Democrats like
Hillary
Clinton OPPOSE having
voters show a photo ID before they can vote which would greatly help prevent
voter fraud so illegal aliens and other ineligible people don't undermine
the integrity of the election process.
Is your Senator
one of the ones who opposed this bill? Not a SINGLE
Democrat voted for this bill! Barrack Obama
didn't even show up to vote!
Mrs. Clinton
has also stated that convicted felons be given back the right to vote. I wonder why
that is? In 2000 an estimated 10,000 felons voted illegally in Florida.
When their voter registration was checked, 85 percent of these convicted
felons were registered as Democrats.
Hillary has a
very nice constituency. Evidence has been found that in In 2000,
Democratic officials reportedly mailed absentee voter applications and
a welcoming form letter from Democratic President Bill
Clinton to California immigrants with legal
Green Cards even though these people were clearly not yet citizens.
Now the Democrats
in an attempt to thwart this problem are voting all over the nation to
give illegal aliens drives licensees although there is NO requirement for
them to have car insurance.
That will allow
illegal aliens to be automatically registered
to vote because the "motor voter"
program which automatically
registers people to vote when they get an election.
How low will the
Democrats go to try and steal an election?
You want to keep
talking about voter suppression Bruce? I could write
an entire book on Democratic voting irregularities but I'll drop the issue
here with just one last point:
This is the way
the 2004 election played out. It's time for
you liberals to get over it. This is the way AMERICA
wants it! Red
= Bush Kerry
= Blue Source:
USA Today, November 5, 2004.
I'd say your side
was a little outnumbered! But instead of
accepting the results you call it voter suppression.
Voter Suppression
to a Liberal
is requiring voters to have a picture ID. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal is
not allowing convicted felons vote. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal
is not allowing illegal aliens to vote. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal
not providing a car for every Democrat who wants to vote. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal is
not allowing Democrats to vote more than once on Election Day. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal
is what they claim EVERY TIME
they loose an election! Voter Suppression
to a liberal is ALLOWING our military personnel to vote!
Unbelievable!
By the way, one
last thing Bruce,
you should be educated to be aware that there is NO
Constitutional right to vote in Presidental elections. None, nada, zip.
So since there is NO
constitutional right to vote for president in the United
States Constitution, there can be NO
such thing as "Voter Supression"
when it comes to presidential election. I know there are many of you numb
brained people who still think that Al
Gore won the 2000 presidential election. Hey Bruce,
get your facts straight you uneducated fool! Welcome to America!
"The Constitution
contains many phrases, clauses, and amendments detailing ways people cannot
be denied the right to vote. You cannot deny the right to vote because
of race or gender. Citizens of Washington DC can vote for President; 18-year-olds
can vote; you can vote even if you fail to pay a poll tax. The Constitution
also requires that anyone who can vote for the "most numerous branch" of
their state legislature can vote for House members and Senate members.
Note that in
all of this, though, the Constitution never explicitly ensures the right
to vote, as it does the right to speech, for example."
Torture?
Very simply Bruce,
when and where? It's hard to answer your allegations of this when
you simply spit out one word, without citing a single incident, or make
any other statements about it.
So
torture? My one word answer to your one word allegation is NO!
Especially if
you refuse to cite a SINGLE
example or ANY
proof whatsoever. But as with ALL your
other allegations you never seem to offer up any proof. You were
on the 60 Minutes TV Show,
and you gave no examples, you've been touring all over the world, and you
gave no examples, you've had countless press interviews, and you gave no
examples.
It's DESPICABLE,
DECEITFUL, AND DISINGENUOUS for you to spout
all these allegations you make and not issue so much as a SHRED
(Yep, that's my name!) of proof. The burden is on YOU
to prove them if YOU
make such allegations.
So I'll have to
tell you Bruce,
I'm VERY angry
at you over this claim you've made. You're accusing our President
of torture, because you've mentioned this administration specifically,
yet you've offered up NO PROOF
whatsoever. Bearing false witness against your brother is a major
sin, and you'll be held accountable for that.
Bruce THIS
is torture and murder, and it was sanctioned by Saddam
Hussien. President
Bush hasn't cut out any tongues. He
also hasn't GASSED
his own countries children
to DEATH with
chemical weapons. His soldiers haven't assassinated their own troops.
His offspring haven't personally raped and beaten people to death.
He hasn't thrown people off of buildings as punishment.
So
Bruce, WHERE
IS YOUR FREAKING PROOF???!!!!!!!
Here's
some torture PROOF
for you Bruce; (Show me yours)
These are
Kurds
gassed to death by Saddam Hussien.
"The following
tortures, punishments and executions, were routine in Iraq during Saddam
Hussein's rule of power: Beatings, Crucifixions,
Hammering nails into the fingers and hands, Amputating sex organs or breasts
with an electric carving knife, Spraying insecticides into a victim's
eyes, Branding with a hot iron, Committing rape while the victim's
spouse is forced to watch, Medical experimentation's, Pouring boiling
water into the victim's rectum, Nailing the tongue to a wooden board, Extracting
teeth with pliers, Using bees and scorpions to sting naked children in
front of their parents, and tying ropes to vehicles and posts to rip off
their limbs. Uday Hussein
would personally dip children's feet into acid, and burning them complexity
off, before he began questioning the parents so that they
would be more compliant to talk. That was just the beginning of
his torture sessions that would go on for hours and end in maimings and
death."
Here's another
particularly cruel form of torture that Saddam Hussien
used quite often.
This video shows
how he had prisoners thrown off the tops of buildings, one after another,
to punish them.
CAUTION:
this video is very graphic and disturbing!
The building tossings
are really cruel because they cause server permanent damage, yet in most
cases it's not enough to kill the victims. Some of these people were
then beaten in public after the tossings and then thrown into jails were
they received little or no medical treatment and suffered for years in
immense pain. Compare this to the Liberals
favorite demon of so called torture, waterboarding, where the entire situation
is over in just a few minutes and no permanent damage occurs to the individual.
Bruce,
I have a lot more videos like this including bloody tongue cuttings and
beheadings, but I think I've made my point. But here is something
you should think about when you specifically accuse President
Bush of torture. Liberals
claim that "waterboarding" is torture and that President
Bush is as bad as "Hitler,
Stalin, and Pol Pot" (said by Democratic
Senator
Dick Durbin on the Senate floor).
During approximately
30 briefings in 2002 by the CIA, Democrats,
including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
and Jay Rockefeller,
were given virtual tours of the CIA's overseas detention sites, and were
told about these methods of interrogation and their response was;
"Are
these methods tough enough"!
Referring to waterboarding,
a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats on Capitol Hill,
NO
objections were raised by the panel. Instead, at least two lawmakers
in the room asked the CIA to "push harder",
two U.S. officials said. Part of this was because the military has
never been allowed to perform waterboarding. These Congress people
wondered if it would be better if they should be.
Then Rep.
Porter J. Goss (R-FL) was a party to the briefings. "Among those
being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was
doing," said Goss,
who chaired the House intelligence committee from 1997 to 2004 and then
served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006. "And
the reaction in the room was not just approval,
but encouragement."
So if this method
of waterboarding is deemed as torture, and thus illegal, will Democratic
Representatives Nancy Pelosi
and Jay Rockefeller
be brought up on charges for being a party to it? Are they are
war criminals like Bush
and Cheney have
been called?
Will they be criminally
investigated by a special counsel and be brought in to testify before Congress?
Will they be sentenced to jail time?!!!
Notice what else
Nancy
Pelosi knew about: The CIA's so called black
sites where terrorists were being held overseas. And she did NOT
object.
Of the only three
cases of waterboarding reported, one was against 9/11 plotter and terrorist
Kalid
Sheik Mohammed.
He was reported
to have been waterboarded for just 2 minutes
before he "broke" and confessed to plotting 9/11 and giving up the names
of other terrorists and plans, which turned out to be true.
Today he
lives in an air conditioned jail and gets 3 meals a day.
Bruce,
I've gotten more water in my mouth in the surf at Asbury
Park than Kalid
Sheik Mohammed did on the day he was waterboarded!
I
bet you have too!
We became aware
of
Kalid Sheik Mohammed.
from this man, Abu Zubayda,
a close ranking associate of Osama bin Laden.
He was captured after a fire fight in Pakistan
where our intelligence officials wiretapped his phone.
He was being held
at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba where
he was interrogated for approximately 2 months during which time he gave
up no intelligence information. Since we knew
for sure from the LEGAL
wiretaps that he was a high ranking al Qaeda
official, our troops decided there might be a better way to interrogate
him.
He was waterboarded.
After just 35 seconds he gave up the name and location of Kalid
Sheik Mohammed. THIRTY
FIVE SECONDS!
Thirty Five seconds.
That's all it took for this piece of human waste to talk. Now this
man also now lives in air conditioned comfort getting three meals a day
which are better than what the guards get! The fact of the matter
is that the time for all of our waterboarding put together has lasted less
than 4 and one half minutes, and it has only been done to THREE
terrorists!
But to this Liberals
scream TORTURE!!!
They claim that the US
is a torture nation and that President Bush
is a war criminal for it. It's simply ridiculous.
Waterboarding
is an interrogation method, NOT
torture. Torture is using beatings, blow torches, pliers, chains, and many
other sadistic methods on people for hours and hours, even days, weeks,
and, yes, years which happened to our soldiers in Vietnam such as Senator
John McCain. Torture many
times leaves the individual with permanent physical damage. Waterboarding
does not.
Torturing someone
for hours, especially on someone who doesn't know anything, doesn't work
and it's cruel and inhumane. But waterboarding someone for just a
few minutes, of whom we know we have very good intelligence on, through
legal methods such as overseas wiretaps works VERY
well.
Our intelligence
personnel know that if someone doesn't give up any information in just
a few minutes of waterboarding that they must knot know very much. Waterboarding
someone for hours isn't going to work. It's going to kill them.
And unlike a beating which can be endured waterboarding seems to produce
some pretty good results in a remarkably short period of time.
I'll venture to
say that if YOU'RE
going to call it torture, and I'M not
willing to call it that, but if YOU are,
that it is the MOST humane
form of torture used. That's because it doesn't kill or maim a person,
it doesn't leave permanent damage, and the whole thing is over in just
a few minutes.
It leaves those
terrorist SCUM
to live out their lives on the taxpayer dime gaining weight as they have,
in a nice comfortable prison cell.
Let's also point
out one other important fact. Waterboarding of prisoners has never happened
in the United States
itself, and it has never happened to an American
citizen. Yep, it's only those non-military combatants, those TERRORISTS,
those non-Geneva Convention
following thugs, those NON AMERICANS,
those women and child killing MURDERERS
caught
on the battlefields of Afghanistan
and Iraq I mentioned
before.
President Bush
ONLY approved wiretaps of those people calling overseas who have some type
of known terrorist activity. What Liberals
don't want you to know, and is rarely reported in the media, is that President
Bush has stopped DOZENS
of major attacks on the United States
with this type of intelligence gathering.
I'm not going
to be sorry if one or two gallons of water, or if listening to an overseas
phone call is going to stop another series of 9/11
attacks against America. I'm not going
to apologize for it, I'm not going to feel bad about it, and I am PROUD
that we have a man in office like George Bush
who
knows how to prevent these attacks from happening again.
If it's going
to stop something like this from happening again, I'm all for it.
So are MOST Americans.
The next time
around the World Trade Center
attacks will seem like child's play. That's because
the the terrorists are actively seeking nuclear weapons and we know it.
The president of Iran, al Qaeda, and
many other would just love to see a mushroom cloud over the United
States.
So Bruce,
you can continue to spout out your one word of protest, "torture"
like a spoiled little kid. We all know what your referring to.
But most of us don't think of a couple of gallons of water as torture ESPECIALLY
if
it's going to prevent something like this from happening.
Bruce,
WAKE
THE #@%! UP!
The only waterboarding
being performed in the United States
is being performed by the military, to it's own Special Operations soldiers,
willingly, to learn how to resist interrogations.
Oh yeah, there
IS
another
group of people who are waterboarding people in America
over and over again.
It's those wacko
anti war kooks who are waterboarding each other!
That interrogator
babe is pretty tough!
Drama
Queens!
Compare that to
the "building tossings" shown above that cause
permanent severe physical damage, not just 2 minutes of being uncomfortable.
Didn't these people
just commit a crime by waterboarding this man?!!! Call Dick
Cheney now! IDIOTS!
Click
Here to watch these wackos waterboard each other!
But Bruce,
since you only mentioned one word "torture",
and never explained yourself, none of us really know what the heck
you are talking about. But that's how you Drive
by Liberals operate. You people make
accusations, with no evidence, and just keep on screaming things like
"Bush
Lied, Kids Died" spinning in a circle like
spoiled little kids until you pass out from exhaustion and need a nappy.
There's a lesson
to be learned about Liberals
from this, and we learned it from the Clinton
Hate Machine who mastered it. With Liberals
it's the seriousness of the charge that's all important, NOT
the
actual evidence.
Bruce,
I produced my evidence with facts, now where's yours? Coward.
I'll agree there
IS
torture going on in America.
It's having to listen to the gang of idiots, Hillary Clinton,
John Edwards, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Ted "The Swimmer" Kennedy's
inane comments on a daily basis!
"Our
Best Men and Women"
In your statement
on the Today
show you mentioned "the loss of our best men
and women in a tragic war." Do
you really believe that Bruce?
Because in the
2004 Presidential campaign you strongly supported John
Kerry. Here you describe Senator
John Kerry as being able to give America a
"sane
and responsible foreign policy".
Click
Here to see Bruce's statement. Listen
closely to John Kerry's "sane and responsible
foreign policy". Senator
Kerry seems a bit confused to me! Click
Here to hear this clip.
See the many positions
John
Kerry took on Iraq.
John Kerry
said: "You know, education,
if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework,
and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don't,
you get stuck in Iraq.”
Click
Here to see John Kerry
basically call American
soldiers stupid.
It doesn't sound
like John Kerry
thinks we sent our best men and women to Iraq. It makes them
sound like they are stupid and that the Army was the only choice for them.
After Kerry
made that statement the troops made a nice little sign for him. Let's not forget
that EVERY American
soldier is a volunteer.
John Kerry
also claims that American troops are TERRORIZING
the women and children of Iraq. He makes this
statement without any proof then tops it off with an even more inane statement: "Iraqi's should
be doing that" Meaning Iraqi's
should be terrorizing people!
Bruce,
when you start supporting Hillary Clinton
for President in 2008 I'll be showing the clips of all her flip flops also!
"The
Neglect of our Great City of New Orleans"
Bruce, I'm going
to have to admit that you're right again. Darn!
New Orleans WAS
a neglected city. That's right, it was neglected by the Democrats
you support and the wacko environmentalists.
Hurricane Katrina
was an act of God. George Bush
did not cause that, despite what some nuts have claimed.
The levee's in
New
Orleans didn't have to break.
But they did, and the aftermath was a disaster. Why?
It was the Democratic
Envirowackos sued the Army
Corps of Engineers (and won) to PREVENT
the levee's in
New Orleans from
being reinforced, are the ones who are now screaming that George
Bush doesn't care about poor people.
They claim they sued to preserve the wetlands. They did that and turned
ALL
of New Orleans
into wetlands!
Back in 1974,
the stalwart guardians of the environment at Save
Our Wetlands filed suit and stopped a congressionally
funded plan to protect New Orleans
with a hurricane barrier. There used to be a link on their web site
saying how they were proud of this action, but it's been mysteriously removed
now that it's apparent that it was their actions that caused New
Orleans to flood.
But it was the
sheer incompetence of Louisiana's Democratic
politicians that made things horribly worse before and after the disaster.
After receiving
a call from President Bush,
telling him there was a very good chance the levee's would break, New
Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin ordered his people
to the Superdome!
Mayor Nagin
was advised to evacuate his citizens, and had the means to do so with thousands
of school busses, but instead he put them right in harms way.
Mayor Nagin IGNORED
the city's own evacuation plans the responsibilities listed therein.
The New
Orleans evacuation plan MANDATED
that ALL people LEAVE
the city and that the city was responsible for busing all those people
out. The evacuation plan, available online, stated that the city would
definitely flood during a category 3 hurricane and that NO
ONE should remain in the city. Provisions
were provided to bus anyone out who could not afford to leave, and the
mayor had at least 500-2000 buses at his disposal to move the people out
of the danger zone.
Here are pictures
of just some of the many school busses Mayor
Nagin could have used to evacuate his people
with. Not only did he allow all these busses to be ruined, he ordered his
people to the CENTER
of the disaster!
Bruce,
the GOVERNOR
of the state is the one who calls in the National Guard, NOT
the President.
In fact it is
AGAINST
THE LAW for a President
to order troops into a state without the permission of that state's governor
under the Posse
Comitatus Act of 1878.
Governor Blanco
is the one you should blame for the "neglect".
It took 3 days
for the incompetent governor of Louisiana, Governor
Blanco to call out the National
Guard.
She's the one
who left thousands of people starving and dying for days,
NOT
George
Bush.
The Red
Cross says on its web site that Governor
Blanco ORDERED
them NOT to bring
food to the starving people at the Superdome
even though they had more than enough supplies nearby.
They said she
told them that she did not want to "create
a magnet for more people to come to the Superdome".
So Mayor Nagin
ordered the people to the Superdome,
and Governor Blanco
refused to let the food and supplies get to them. Nice teamwork by
the Democrats
who "care"!
Instead of accepting
President
Bush's offer for help, Governor Blanco
inexplicably called the FORMER, IMPEACHED
President, Bill Clinton, and
asked him what to do!
She then called
to FORMER head
of FEMA under
Bill
Clinton, James DeWitt
and asked him what to do!
One can only hope
that Clinton's response
was "Stop being such
a moron and accept the Presidents help!"
There's tons more
I could say about New Orleans
including the misappropriations of funds by the Democrats
from the BILLIONS
of dollars of aid that President Bush
sent down there.
How come Mississippi,
and Florida didn't
have the same problems as Louisiana
did?
The answer is
with the Democrats of Louisiana
ran one of the most corrupt states in the nation for a half a century,
and from them preventing the levee's to be built. Those things combined
with them preventing President Bush
to send immediate help after the disaster, and not heeding his and the
National
Weather Service warning them of imminent disaster,
and from them not following the cities own evacuation plans.
All of these problems
created by the Democrats of Louisiana
combined to create the perfect storm of Socialist
disaster that New Orleans
became.
While the left
wing media such as CNN ("The
Communist News Network" AKA known as "The Clinton News Network")
showed all of the poor people stranded on rooftops, and starving at the
Superdome and blaming President Bush
for not caring, they conveniently forgot to tell the truth about the situation
such as the Mayor
ignoring the cities evacuation plans, the Governor
refusing federal and Red Cross
help.
Instead the media
showed the now known to be made up stories about murders and rapes at the
Superdome,
and didn't mention that the President's
help was RIGHT THERE
but that he was prevented by FEDERAL LAW
from sending troops in UNTIL the
Governor
requested
them.
You've mentioned
that the President
should be impeached, but you didn't mention that an impeachable offense
by him would have been to violate the Posse
Comitatus Act.
While your ignorant
buddy Kanye West
declared that "George Bush doesn't care about
black people", it seems like he, the media,
and you, were unaware of the law.
So
be honest Bruce,
and tell the TRUTH
for ONCE!
It wasn't President
Bush who stopped the levee's from being built,
nor was it he who prevented the city from being evacuated, nor was it he
who refused help to arrive to the flooded city, nor was it he who misspent
the billions of dollars of aid that went to the city after the natural
disaster.
He also didn't
cause the disaster by not signing the Kyoto
Treaty as Robert
Kennedy Jr. ridiculously claimed.
No Bruce,
it was your Democratic Socialistic
friends who neglected New Orleans. You can spin
it any way you want, just like the leftist media did, but that doesn't
change the facts of what REALLY
happened.
Isn't it just
amazing that all the Liberal Idiots
who criticized our government for not helping the people in New
Orleans want to put the government in charge
of our health care!
That right there
is the main problem with Democratic Liberalism,
it's simply never consistent, and by the way, it never works to fix problems
either.
The
"Division of Wealth"
Bruce Springsteen
and
his Liberal Democratic
friends keep crying about the "Division of
Wealth" and the lack of health care in America
like we're all living the the The Great Depression.
Nothing could be further from the truth as America
is living in the greatest period of prosperity in the history of the planet.
What the heck
is the "Division of Wealth" Bruce?
You make it sound like there was this big pile of money and most of it
was given
to a select few people and withheld from the rest.
I have news for
you Bruce.
Most of the wealth in the country was created from the hard work by the
people who EARNED it,
and, by the way, paid ENORMOUS
taxes on it, it was not given
to them. Except, of course,
those overpaid idiots like actors and rock stars:)
People start businesses,
and work extremely hard to make money. America
has the highest standard of living in the entire world. Even our poor people
are considered wealthy compared to over 50% of the world. Our wages
are higher, our unemployment lower than all other countries.
So I guess you
want a more equitable division of the wealth? That's code for taking
it from the rich and giving it to the poor. Which is, of course, SOCIALISM!
Do you need another
lesson in economics Bruce?
It's the wealthy who support most of the tax burden in America.
If you want to know just how effective
the mainstream media is, it is amazing how many people that fall into the
categories below think President Bush is screwing
them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President
ever. If ANY Democrat is elected, ALL
of them say they will repeal the Bush tax
cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above
can't wait for it to happen. Notice that those making $30,000 had
thier taxes almost CUT IN HALF by President
Bush! That's what the Democrats
call "Tax cuts for the
rich"!
Presidential
candidate, former ambulance chasing attorney, and New
Orleans mortgage forecloser (Oops!), John
Edwards claims that these 37 million Americans
currently "struggle with incredible poverty."
John Edwards,
while
living in a multi million dollar mansion purchased with the money he earned
from suing
doctors under false pretenses, and the money he made from hedge funds
that forecloses
on the homes of devastated New Orleans, asserts that America's
poor, who number "one in eight of us…do not
have enough money for the food, shelter, and clothing they need,"
and are forced to live in "terrible"
circumstances.
However, an examination
of the living standards of the 37 million persons performed by the US Census
Bureau, whom the government defines as "poor,"
reveals
that what Edwards calls "the
plague" of American poverty might not be as
"terrible"
or
"incredible"
as candidate Edwardscontends.
Forty-three percent
of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned
by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three bedroom house
with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
Eighty percent of
poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent
of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
Only 6 percent of
poor households are overcrowded. More than two-thirds have more than two
rooms per person.
The average poor
American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris,
London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons
are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified
as poor.)
Nearly three-quarters
of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
Ninety-seven percent
of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color
televisions.
Seventy-eight percent
have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
Eighty-nine percent
own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and more than a third
have an automatic dishwasher.
Plasma
TV Slum!
Here is a "poor"
woman living in government paid public housing. She says "I
might be poor but I don't like to live poor. I thank God for a place to
live but it's pitiful what people give you."
PITIFUL?!!!
This woman gets government assistance, free government housing, free medical
care, and do you also notice that she also owns a 60
inch widescreen high definition PLASMA TV!!!
This "poor"
woman, Sharon Jasper,
also said "I'm tired of the slum landlords,
and I'm tired of the slum houses".
SLUM
housing?!!!
Plasma TV
Slum! with hardwood
floors and a microwave
oven!