Al Gore's Global Warming Lies
The Religion of Environmentalism
Worried about Global Warming?

You've been hoodwinked, bamboozled, and SWINDLED by 
Al Gore and his leftist buddies in the media.

Al Gore says that NO scientists disagree with him and that the debate is OVER

NOTHING could be FURTHER from the truth!

The TRUTH is Al Gore REFUSES to debate ANY of his critics.

There are now over 20,000 signatures by scientists and on a petition against Groomsman made Global Warming assertions.

More Than 15,000 Scientists Speak Out Against
The Global Warming Myth

While Gore flies gas guzzling private jets to all his events, and uses more than 20 times the electricity than most Americans, he also sells himself useless "Carbon Offsets", through a company he owns!   What a crock of bullcrap!

Al Gore is the ultimate hypocrite!

Instead of investigating with scientific fact, Al Gore has turned Global Warming into a RELIGION that he allows NO ONE to question.

That's NOT science, 
it's environmental religious dogma.


Does Al Gore really believe in catastrophic global warming that he preaches about?

Since Al Gore was offered the opportunity (in person) to facilitate serious debate on the underlying science of global climate change but he has REFUSED every single opportunity to do so.

If he is SO SURE of his beliefs why won't he defend them?

Demand Debate.com

CLICK HERE to sign a petition asking Al Gore to debate Global Warming.

The end is near!

I swear, were all going to die soon!

This HOT AIR is what's
causing Global Warming!

 

Shhh, don't disagree with me!
Shhh, I know best!

 Believe Me or
Ye shall ALL DIE!
Ye shall all DIE if you do not listen to ME!

DEMAND Al Gore debate Global Warming!


In March of 2008 Al Gore said that anyone who doesn't believe in his Global Warming is a "flat earther" or should be regarded as the same nuts who believe the moon landings were staged. He's CONVINCED that Global Warming is real, and he's unleashing a brand new $300 million dollar ad campaign about it.
But the funny thing is that Al Gore will STILL not even CONSIDER debating the issue with any REAL scientists.

Earlier in the month The 2008 International Conference on Climate Change was held in New York and even though they offered Gore his normal $200,000.00 fee to speak at it,  but he refused to show up.

Al Gore says that you are insane to question him!
Click Here to see Al Gore
call all of you who don't 
believe in Global Warming
that you are a "flat-earthers.

Hundreds of REAL scientists attended who had real questions for Gore and lots of new evidence that overwhelmingly proves his theory wrong.  But Gore still insists that there is only a tiny amount of people who disagrees with him and NOTHING could be further from the TRUTH.
The TRUTH is that thousands upon thousands of REAL scientists disagree with this NON-scientist!

The 2008 International Conference on Climate Change

But if Al Gore is so sure that he is right why won't he even debate the issue?
As famed author George Will put it, “people ONLY insist that a debate stop when they are afraid of what might be learned if it continues.”


Al Gore is now insulting the intelligence of any scientist with a brain by comparing them people who don't buy into his version of Global Warming to those who still believe the Earth is flat!

THIS IS HIS BEST ARGUMENT AGAINST SCIENTIFIC DEBATE?!!!

So in Al Gore's mind, if a scientist disputes his man made Global Warming theory than they are no smarter than someone who lived 600 years ago!  Give me a break!  Click Here to see the video clip where Al Gore smugly tells us why we should not even debate Global Warming.

CLICK HERE to see Al Gore tell us why we shouldn't debate Global Warming.

The man who won the Nobel Peace Prize, Al Gore,  who happens to be an heir to a family fortune built on Occidental Petroleum, REFUSES to even debate his theory of Global Warming. He also refuses to let the press attend ANY of his high paid speeches.

No REAL scientist would EVER do that.  But of course, Al Gore ISN'T a scientist, he's simply a politician.  In his speech to the Nobel committee he compared the rest of us who don't buy his drivel of unproven junk science to Nazi sympathizers.  You've got some set of coconuts on you Al!

The Nobel Peace Prize is given out by this mandate by it's founder, Alfred Nobel:
Nobel said; The prize should be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

How then does a non-scientist like Al Gore get a "Peace Prize" for something that has NOTHING to do with world peace?!

Here's the kicker that shows you Al Gore is a mindless idiot.

He has said that Global Warming is both inevitable and reversible.  Never have I hear two more incongruent words in all of my life.

Al, you mindless idiot, anything that is INEVITABLE by definition CANNOT be REVERSIBLE!

We are all Carbon based life forms. We all need Oxygen to live. Plants need CO2 to live on.
Simple Carbon and Oxygen is CO2, Carbon Dioxide. CO2 is NOT a pollutant.

My goodness Gore, where did you go to school?!!!  Did you really think we were going to buy this crap?!!!
 

Hey Al Gore

I thought the science was "settled"?

What is Al Gore smoking?!!!

Click Here to find out!

Click Here to see why Al Gore believe in Global Warming


FACT: Al Gore says that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day.  What he doesn't tell you is that mother nature puts 24,000 times that amount of our main greenhouse gas -- water vapor -- into the atmosphere every day!

SOURCE: Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville, former NASA scientist.

Care to debate a REAL scientist, Mr. Gore?  I thought not!

Some people are now saying that Al Gore should run for President again since he's won an Oscar and the Nobel Peace Prize.

Let me make one thing PERFECTLY clear.  Al Gore will NEVER run for President again.
Why?  Plain and simple.  Because if he did he'd HAVE to debate Global Warming and he'll NEVER do that because he knows the science doesn't back him up.



Click Here to watch John Stossel and Bill O'Reilly discuss why the Great Al Gore won't even debate Global Warming.

 Page Links

The Great Global Warming Swindle
The Religion of Environmentalism
Consensus is NOT Science
Global Warming Causes EVERYTHING!
The Global Warming Scare Is All About Politics
Al Gore's Silly Earth Pledge
The False Temperature Readings
The Sea Ice ISN'T melting!
The Failed Kyoto Treaty
Environmentalists Have No Energy Solutions
The Cooling World
Recycling Creates Pollution
Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green
Terrorist Environmentalists
Ethanol Is A REALLY Bad Idea!
ANWR - The Sensible Solution
Compact Florescent Light Bulbs 
Are DANGEROUS!
Cash In Your Carbon Credits
The Carbon Offset Scam
More Global Warming Links
We're DOOMED!
Al Gore's Personal Hypocrisy
No Energy In The Energy Bill?!!!
The Failed Live Earth Concerts
Abort Your Baby To Save The Planet!
Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide - DHMO!

The Great 
Global Warming Swindle

Let's start with the facts.  There are new videos out that totally contradicts Al Gore's work of fiction, An Inconvenient Truth

It uses REAL science, not just the useless, 
inaccurate computer models that Gore uses.

CLICK HERE to view a clip from the "The Great Global Warming Swindle" and learn the
TRUTH about the many misrepresentations in Gore's "Inconvenient  Truth" movie.


In this clip it is explained how Global temperatures were higher in the past,
and that it was much warmer on the Earth just 1000 Years ago.
This film was made even BEFORE the recently corrected data came out
that further debunks Al Gore's assertions.
Click Here to see the clip that shows the Earth was warmer just 1000 Years ago.

 
Click Here to see another clip of the movie where it explains 
Al Gore's claims about that Co2 is minor and needed greenhouse gas.
Click Here to see the relationship of temp vs. Co2

I would love to present the entire movie to you but because of copyright laws I cannot.

There was so much backlash against the makers of this film that it has been pulled from
the shelves and the BBC refuses to air it again.
The BBC now refers to this movie as a "mistake"!

They consider it a mistake to show the other side of the Global Warming debate.
Just like Al Gore, they believe there should be NO debate on
Global Warming and that the science is "settled".

If anyone knows where a download of this movie is available
please let me know and I will post the link.

If you really want a copy of this excellent film please email me.




Another excellent documentary on the
"Climate Change" farce is called
"Exposed: The Climate Of Fear"


 

CLICK HERE to watch just a short 
Real Player clip of this documentary.
Please give the clip a minute to load.

Click here to see a longer clip on YouTube.

The complete video has been removed from the web.
I wonder why they won't let you see the other side?
If you have an online link to entire show please email it to me and i will post it here.


More money is now being funded to these Global Warming "scientists" than is for curing cancer.  Disgraceful!!!

It's time the TRUTH comes out about this nonsense.

Al Gore's ‘Truth’ May Be Far From It.

Learn more here: Global Warming Myths and Lies

Another TRUTHFUL site: Global Warming Lies

Global Warming is a Farce

If anyone cannot view these movies please contact me,
and I'd be happy to send you a DVD of them.

Al Gore's "Consensus" vs.
REAL SCIENCE!
Al Gore says "This is one of the strongest of scientific consensus views in the history of science".

"There is very little dispute about global warming," he added.
No, not to a man who refuses to debate the issue!

"There has been an organized campaign, financed to the tune of about $10 million a year from some of the largest carbon polluters, to create the impression that there is disagreement in the scientific community," Gore said at a forum in Singapore. 

"In actuality, there is very little disagreement." 

Hey Al, Have you ever heard of the Scientific Method?

Let's get one thing straight right away: CONSENSUS IS NOT SCIENCE!

A "consensus" does not equate to fact. When scientists can use the Scientific Method to prove that global warming is caused by humans, then and ONLY then can it be accepted as fact.

The encyclopedia defines what the word "consensus" really means:

"Consensus has two common meanings. One is a general agreement among the members of a given group or community, each of which exercises some discretion in decision making and follow up action. The other is as a theory and practice of getting such agreements.

Achieving consensus requires serious treatment of every group member's considered opinion. Once a decision is made it is important to trust in members' discretion in follow up action. In the ideal case, those who wish to take up some action want to hear those who oppose it, because they count on the fact that the ensuing debate will improve the consensus. In theory, action without resolution of considered opposition will be rare and done with attention to minimize damage to relationships."

Al Gore and the other Global Warming purveyors REFUSE to even listen to the other side about the issue of Global Warming.

They wants all the rest of us to take action but they do not want to hear from the opposition. And by taking action all they really mean is raising our taxes.

The TRUTH is that there is a VERY strong disagreement about so called Global Warming

In a recent poll of scientists the vote was close to 50/50 as the whether Global Warming even exists!  That's NOT a consensus, that's an ELECTION!

Al Gore says "There has been an organized campaign, financed to the tune of about $10 million a year from some of the largest carbon polluters, to create the impression that there is disagreement in the scientific community".

What Gore fails to mention is that the promoters of Global Warming propaganda have been estimated to have spent close to 50 BILLION DOLLARS in the form of various government grants, university grants, corporate donations, and private donations.
Al Gore's Live Earth concerts cost far more than $10 million dollars to put on.

The fact is that there is SERIOUS disagreement in the "scientific community" about the existence of Global Warming.

And why is Gore using the words "scientific community" and "consensus" at the same time anyway?

Global Warming has not been put to the test by the "Scientific Method" as explained in the encyclopedia:

"The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and integrating previous knowledge. It is based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning, the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.

The advantage of the scientific method is that it is unprejudiced. One can test an experiment and determine whether his/her results are true or false. The conclusions will hold regardless of the state of mind, or the bias of the investigator and/or the subject of the investigation. 

Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methodologies of knowledge. Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies that test these hypotheses for accuracy."

Introduction to the Scientific Method


Author Michael Crichton said it best:

"Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.

"Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus."

"Consensus is the business of politics.  Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.  In science consensus is irrelevant.  What IS relevant is reproducible results. 
The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus."

Al Gore's "consensus" is NOT science, it is simply a VOTE by some scientists.

Al Gore's Global Warming claims have NOT been tested as MUST happen according to the Scientific Method.  And as far as the evidence is concerned, there is quite a lot of evidence to suggest that Global Warming is NOT happening.

New ice core samples, faulty temperature gathering methods, and the growth of new icebergs in Antarctica are just a few examples of how the REAL science disagrees with Al Gore's assertions.

But then again he allows NO debate on the issue of Global Warming because this is not really science for him, it's his RELIGION!



How about a little more science for Al Gore:

Data on Atlantic flow are undercut.

A perceived slowdown in circulation, linked to global warming, may actually have been normal variations in the flow pattern.
By Alan Zarembo,   August 17, 2007 

A massive ocean circulation pattern that plays a crucial role in shaping the world's climate may not have been slowing down over the last few decades as scientists previously believed, according to a study released Thursday.

The perceived slowdown had been considered alarming support for computer predictions that global warming would disrupt the planet's heat regulation.

In a single year of measurements, published in today's issue of the journal Science, the scientists found enough normal variation in the pattern to suggest that previous studies were premature in asserting a long term trend.

"We can't strictly say they are wrong, but we can have an alternative explanation," said coauthor Torsten O. Kanzow, an oceanographer at the National Oceanography Center in Southampton, England.

"Despite their own findings, many of the researchers believe that a slowdown is occurring. 
But they lack proof."

"Despite their own findings" . . . do you mean the actual SCIENCE that says warming may NOT be happening, some scientists still believe in Global Warming?
Even though they "lack proof"?  Sounds like a religion to me.


Here's a list of top scientists who dispute Al Gore's 
Global Warming Doomsday Claims:

17,200 Scientists Dispute Global Warming.

Scientists opposing the scientific
assessment of Global Warming.

The global warming hypothesis has failed
every relevant experimental test. 
Global Warming Petition Project

The Global Warming Scam


Global Warming is ALL about Politics
It's NOT about Science.

Al Gore has stated that Global Warming is NOT a political issue, that it's NOT a right vs. left issue, it's about science.  We now all know that Mr. Gore will not debate the science and that the issue is closed in his mind.
Of course, that's not how science works.  So it's NOT about the science for him, it's about his beliefs, because he refuses to debate the science in any way. Gore tells us we can no longer question the science.   Why not?  Isn't that how real science works???
 

Robert Kennedy Jr. spoke at the Live Earth concert. This is what he had to say:

KENNEDY: "I'm going to tell you this, that the next time you see John Stossel or Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity -- these flat-earthers, these corporate toadies -- lying to you, lying to the American public, and telling you that global warming doesn't exist, you send an e-mail to their advertisers and tell them you're not going to buy their products anymore!"

I'm a HYPOCRITE!

He went on to say:  "It is MORE important than buying compact fluorescent light bulbs or than buying a fuel efficient automobile."
"The most important thing you can do is to get involved in the POLITICAL PROCESS".

Wait a minute here! "The most important thing you can do is to get involved in the

"POLITICAL PROCESS"?!!!

I thought this was about the SCIENCE and NOT about POLITICS?
The Global Warming crowd have finally let the truth out, it IS about politics for them.
 

Let's examine what RFK Jr. said. 
He mentioned Glenn Beck as being a Global Warming denier. CLICK HERE to watch this short video clip from the documentary "Exposed: The Climate Of Fear" in which Glenn Beck says he DOES believe in global warming. 
He's only questioning all of Al Gore's claims concerning it.
So right away we know that Robert Kennedy Jr.
is LYING about what Glenn Beck said!
CLICK HERE where Glenn Beck says he DOES believe in Global Warming.

 
RFK Jr. also mentioned John Stossel as being a "corporate toadie" who also denies Global Warming. CLICK HERE to watch this video clip where John Stossel confronts RFK Jr. and says he DOES believe in global warming. 
John Stossel is only questioning all of RFK Jr.'s claims and solutions about Global Warming yet RFK Jr. calls him a liar and does so again in this clip.
Just like Al Gore, RFK Jr. says we can't even question the science on this issue.  I guess they are simply smarter than we are.
Please give the Real Player clips a minute to load
CLICK HERE to see John Stossel dispute RFK's charge against him.

 
On August 15, 2007 Rush Limbaugh said "I know people are starting to pound me out there for saying this whole global warming thing is a hoax.  Let me clarify.  We MAY be warming up.  What IS a hoax is that only rich industrialized nations are causing it, and that it is manmade."
"The whole thing is a political process and a political agenda, hiding behind the saving of the planet and so forth.  I don't know if it's warming up or not, but I think it's ALWAYS warming or cooling.  How do we know what the ideal temperature of the planet is? "
They say I'm dishonest because I question the science.

So now we know that Robert Kennedy Jr.
is LYING about what John Stossel, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh have said.
None of these men have said that they deny Global Warming may be happening.

Kennedy said in his interview the science is OVER
Notice to Mr. Kennedy:
REAL science is NEVER over!

Then he talks about a "consensus" of scientists agree about Global Warming
A "consensus" of people is simply a group of people agreeing on something, but a consensus is NOT science, it is simply a bunch of opinions. It is basically an election.

The TRUTH is that there is a MUCH larger consensus of scientists who believe this is all just bull, and there is REAL science to disprove all this Global Warming hysteria.
 

Kennedy says
"Just go outside...
you can just feel how hot it has been recently"
That's REAL SCIENCE all right!!!

Robert Kennedy Jr. is the only "Toad" here!

I'm a HYPOCRITE!
Listen to ME!
Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh have both also said that Global Warming may be happening they too are simply are questioning the SCIENCE about it, and not the hysterical propaganda the environmentalists are spewing.

Both of these men have mentioned, among other things, that maybe it's simply the sun, which has been scientifically proven to have been getting hotter, that could be causing this. 

Seasons of the Sun

So it's seems what RFK Jr. said, that these 4 men are "Global Warming Deniers" is NOT true.
Of course honesty has always seemed to be a problem with the Kennedy men, but that's a whole other issue!

Kennedy went on to say: "of all these rotten politicians that we have in Washington, DC, who are nothing more than corporate toadies for companies like Exxon and Southern Company, these villainous companies that consistently put their private financial interests ahead of American interests and ahead of the interests of all humanity.  This is treason, and we need to start treating them now as traitors, and they have their -- their slick public relations firms and their phony think tanks in Washington, DC, and their crooked scientists who are lying to the American people day after day after day, and we have a press that has completely let done American democracy."

This is pure Socialist propaganda, to claim that corporations are evil and must be stopped.
This coming from a man, RFK Jr., who, like Al Gore, flies around in private jets and lives off of his families multi million dollar CORPORATE trust fund that partially came from OIL STOCKS!

So anyone, even a scientist, questioning Global Warming, is a traitor in his mind.  Unbelievable.

I thought Global Warming was a "science" issue.  I thought it was ALL about the science! 
That's what THEY said!   No, of course it's not!  It's about politics; it's about socialism, big government, liberalism, whatever -- and Bobby Kennedy Jr. doesn't like the fact he can't control all these people and make them see the world the way he wants them to see it because they see through his hoax.

Why is Exxon traitor? 
In the Liberal mind ALL corporations are traitors because Liberals hate Capitalism and think that it is ALL corrupt.
Exxon brings us the cheapest gasoline in the world and does a great service for us. 
So why does RFK Jr. consider them evil (as he pumps Exxon's jet fuel into his private jet)?

Name me ONE other liquid product in the grocery store that sells for less than $3.00 a gallon?
Ketchup, Mustard, Mayonnaise, Sour Cream, Yogurt, Apple Juice, Soy Sauce, Salad Dressing, even most bottled water, some of which is simply being pumped directly out of city water supplies, costs us more than $3.00 a gallon!

Orange juice is now selling for $7.00 a gallon in the store I buy it from.

But Exxon selling gas at $3.00 a gallon is a TREASONOUS CRIME to these people!
Why aren't they boycotting Gulden's Mustard
In fact why are these people even buying a product they HATE so much?

THEY should ride bikes and stop flying around in private jets and THEY should STOP telling the rest of us how to live our lives.
 

Sean Hannity asked Robert Kennedy Jr. to take a pledge not to to fly in gas guzzling private jets anymore. Kennedy said that he wouldn't even dignify that question with an answer!  Why won't you take the pledge Mr. Kennedy and fly commercial airliners like the rest of us?

CLICK HERE to see the video.

Meanwhile Kennedy bashes Sean Hannity and calls him a liar when HE is the hypocrite and liar.

RFK Jr. refuses to stop using private jets.

Let's not forget that Robert Kennedy Jr. psychotically blamed Hurricane Katrina on George Bush's failure to sign the Kyoto Treaty.  That treaty was presented to Bill Clinton and AL GORE long before George Bush ever took office.  Why didn't THEY sign and have it ratified it if it was so important?!

The difference in the temperature of the planet had Kyoto been signed would have POSSIBLY have been a fraction of 0.0001% and would have made NO DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER in the severity of the hurricane.
But it just goes to show what a lying nut job this man is.

Hurricane Katrina: Robert Kennedy Says Bush Caused it.


What about Arianna Huffington, another strong advocate of Global Warming who tells us all to make small sacrifices in our lives to "Save The Planet"?

When asked about Al Gore, RFK Jr., and even HER own private jet use she says they can just buy "carbon offsets" and continue to be environmental sinners.
They want us to make "small" sacrifices while they commit HUGE environmental sins.

CLICK HERE to see the video clip.

CLICK HERE to see Arianna tell us it's OK to pollute if you're rich!
Another environmental
HYPOCRITE!

The MONEY is in supporting the Global Warming theory now.  There is now more money is being spent on the promotion of Global Warming than is being spent on Cancer research. 
Scientific grants, giveaways, YOUR tax money, by the billions, is being GIVEN to these people who want to prop up this unproven idea of Global Warming
That's because these people jobs, i.e., their very lives, DEPEND upon their Global Warming fear mongering.


After noticing that Exxon made huge profits this year, something that is perfectly legal, Hillary Clinton said:

"I want to TAKE those profits and put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence."

"TAKE" profits? That's the definition of Socialism!

CLICK HERE to see this smug woman say this.

I know best. Now the rest of you sit down and SHUT UP!

Why should the oil companies have to pay to find new sources of alternative fuels? 
That's not their business, their business is to find and pump oil and gas. That's what they do.
NO ONE has the right to TAKE away their profits.

They operate legitimate businesses and the oil companies already pay MASSIVE taxes.
And if you don't want to buy gasoline, you can choose not to.

If they "TAKE " Exxon's profits the price of gasoline will skyrocket or the oil companies will simply get out of the oil business altogether.  How is that going to solve anything?

Taking from the rich, or the "EVIL RICH" as they categorize them, is simply a part of their Socialist agenda.

By the way what she said is 100% FALSE. The HIGHEST "profits" in the history of the world have been the taxes the US Government has STOLEN from the American people.

You FOOL!  Profits are GOOD!!!  They create jobs, investment, and revenue for the govt.
But that's Capitalism (Freedom) , and we all know Hillary loves SOCIALISM.

The TRUTH is that Bill and Hillary Clinton have Exxon Mobil stock in their own portfolio so they are making money off of them too. And there's nothing wrong with that.

The TRUTH is that the oil companies only make about 15 cents on a gallon of gasoline. The rest goes to expenses and taxes. It's a volume business meaning they have to sell a heck of a lot of gas to make a large profit, and they do.

But federal and state taxes on a gasoline run between 75 cents and $1.50 per gallon!

So who's ripping off the public on the price of gas?

It's NOT the oil companies ripping you off.
That's right, it's the LIBERAL politicians taxing you to death!

Of course, we could have energy independence if the Liberals like Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, and RFK Jr. would let us drill for our own oil in ANWR Alaska and build new, safe, clean nuclear power plants that don't pollute.
 

But OH NO they don't want that. They want some imaginary answer for our energy needs to pop out of the sky, or from the oil companies, and ultimately out of YOUR pockets.

Click Here to listen to my reworked clip of what Hillary Clinton actually said:)

Ha Ha Ha!!!

In December of 2007 Hillary Clinton said "When the world hears of my commitment at my inauguration about ending American dependence on foreign fuel, oil pumping countries will lower prices to stifle America's incentive to develop alternative energy.  I predict to you, the oil producing countries will drop the price of oil."

Not only is that one of the stupidest things that Hillary, or any other Presidential candidate has EVER said, it's completely and utterly absurd.  OPEC is going to lower the price of oil because they fear Hillary's energy policy?!!! 

You can read below how the Democrats 2007 Energy Bill is missing one vital element; it doesn't create ANY new energy sources, it's all about using less energy.

But don't let Hillary fool you. She knows full well OPEC isn't going to lower their prices because of anything she does. They can simply sell more oil to Russia and China who are begging for it.
It's just a combination of Hillary Clinton's pattern of lies, ignorance, pandering, and her true  Socialist agenda.

The ONLY way to lower the price of oil here is for America to drill more of our own abundant supplies of it here in the United StatesSENSIBLE alternative energy sources such as increasing nuclear power, increased natural gas drilling, and clean coal technology are also what we need now, but they are years away from implementation because Congress has BLOCKED all of these existing technologies at this point.  These idiotic roadblocks they have put in the way of creating new energy isn't just going to cost us dearly in terms of dollars, it also greatly weakens our national security.

Yes, one day hydrogen and other energy sources will also be viable alternatives.  But we are still years away from that technology being productive enough to make a dent in our energy needs.
There are scientific roadblocks that still must be overcome.

Throwing government money (YOUR tax money) at these technologies isn't going to make them happen any quicker.  In fact it will be private industry, yes that dirty word to Liberals, CAPITALISM, that will make these new forms of energy work.

Capitalism, despite what Hillary Clinton and John Edwards (HUGE Capitalists themselves) is not an evil thing.  It's Capitalism that has given America it's freedom. We are all free to participate in it and prosper. 

Capitalism is a GOOD thing, but these people simply want to play Robin Hood and rob from the rich and give to the poor.  Maybe that sounds like a good and a fair thing to some people, but in truth that's just SOCIALISM which destroys countries and freedom itself.

I'll be authoring a new page on Economics 101 soon because the rampant ignorance of how Capitalism, and basic economics works is astounding in America. And NOTHING is more costly than ignorance. I'll keep you guys updated:)


Rep. John Dinged, D-Mich, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee has suggested the only real way to reduce greenhouse gases significantly is to raise taxes say with an additional 50 cents a gallon increase in federal gasoline taxes

More taxes!  That's the answer!  These politicians aren't happy with the $1.50 they already tax you for each gallon of gasoline. Now they want an additional 50 cents per gallon!

Raising taxes is ALWAYS the Liberal, Democratic response to EVERY problem.  Never mind that this entire Global Warming scenario, and it's solutions, is based on very questionable "science", the way to handle it in the Liberal mind is to raise taxes . . . as usual.

John Dinged basically wants us to drive less and use less gas.  Oil is the ENGINE of the WORLDS economy.  The more energy we use the more that gets done in the world. Everyone makes more money, everyone gets more food. The gasoline engine is critical to raise poorer people out of poverty.

Think about it, who's going to be hurt more by higher gasoline taxes, the rich or the poor?
Of course it will hurt the poor more since they will be spending more on fuel and have less to spend on other necessities.

But then again most things that Liberals do to help the poor usually end up hurting them even more in the long run.

House Energy and Commerce Committee senior Republican, Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma, attacked the tax plan as unworkable.

"Carbon cap-and-trade legislation will impose the largest tax increase ever on the American people without any measurable climate benefits," he said.

Let me repeat that, "without ANY measurable climate benefits".  Finally, a voice of reason.


Senator James Inhofe of recently gave a speech on the hysteria of Global Warming alarmism.

HOT & COLD MEDIA SPIN CYCLE:
A CHALLENGE TO JOURNALISTS WHO COVER GLOBAL WARMING

 

A Voice of Sense and Reason

Of course, the media then attacked the Senator for having a different opinion calling him "Senator Crank".  Once again we're told to not even question the existence of Global Warming.
They go back to the "scientific consensus" argument which is pure bullcrap because anyone who questions it is simply dismissed as being called a "denier".

They say a body of "scientific experts" have been studying this problem for 4 years. 
Wow, that's certainly long enough to know DEFINITIVELY that Global Warming exists! 

They go on to say that computer models of highly sophisticated computer models, climate scientists can project -- not just predict -- how much temperatures may rise by, say, 2100 if we carry on with business as usual.

They've come to the conclusion that THEY KNOW FOR SURE, and that we should not question them.  The problem is, if you read further down on this web page, the data they are using to create these computer models is coming from various National Weather Service temperature sensors, and that data is sometimes VERY flawed.

Sen. James Inhofe's Science Abuse

The media has branded Senator Inhofe as some sort of environmental Satan for questing the "consensus" behind Global Warming because he questions their template of crisis and fear.

Nothing could be further from the truth as the Senator has recently introduced a bill to protect our nations water supplies which many Democrats have vowed to fight.
 

Inaccuracies in Al Gore's film
"An Inconvenient Truth"
Can you explain these inaccuracies Mr.Gore?

The British government has decided to distribute Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" to be viewed in schools there.  But a court there has ordered that if the film is shown that nine inaccuracies in the film be told to schoolchildren before the movie is shown.

In order for the film to be shown, the Government must first amend their Guidance Notes to Teachers to make clear that:

1. The film is a POLITICAL work and promotes only one side of the argument. 

2. If teachers present the film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination

3. Eleven inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.

The inaccuracies in Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" are:

  • The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming.  The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct. 
  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years.  The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years. 
  • The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming.  The Government's expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute one events to global warming. 
  • The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming.  The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case. 
  • The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice.  It turned out that Mr. Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm. 
  • The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility
  • The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will NOT melt for millennia.
  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact INCREASING.
  • The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching.  The Government could not find ANY evidence to support this claim. 
  • The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7 meters causing the displacement of millions of people.  In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to only rise by about 40 cm over the next hundred years and that there is NO such threat of massive migration. 

  • The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand.  The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim


Inaccuracies in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth

British Court Identifies Inaccuracies in
Al Gore's film ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

The courts ruling requires that students be told by teachers that Al Gore is factually inaccurate, misleading and - in one case - making things up

These inconvenient truths for the former Vice President have been covered up or obscured by the hype surrounding his film. 

Students will now realize that there are significant shortcomings and inaccuracies in the way the global warming scare has been presented to them. 

This is a victory for honest debate, a victory for science and a victory for education.  Sorry, Al.
 

The False Global Warming
Temperature Readings
The Global Warming crowd tells us that the temperature of the Earth is rising every year because they actually go out and measure it. 

How many times have you heard
"Last year was the hottest on record"?

They claim they have the proof.

Let's look into how they are actually measuring these temperatures.

Or to be more specific where they are measuring them. 

NOAA - The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration states that temperature monitoring stations must be placed certain distances away from any heat producing devices. Generally that distance is 100 feet.
NOAA's temperature sensor guidelines can be found HERE.

But these NOAA regulations are NOT being followed and temperature stations are being placed ridiculously close to high heat producing devices such as air conditioning units, exhaust fans, trash burning drums, barbecue grills, sewage treatment plants, airplane engines, tennis courts, and other hot places that are SPECIFICALLY warned against placing the sensors near.

NOAA's rules specifically state that temperature sensors should not be placed within 100 feet of buildings, concrete, or asphalt parking lots, and certainly not in the vicinity of any heat producing devices such as air conditioners or hot air vents.
 

Even the National Weather Service is not following the rules as to where these temperature monitoring stations are to be placed.

If THEY aren't following the rules how would we expect others to as well?

Click Here to see a video of meteorologist Anthony Watts explaining the problem with the "official" temperature readings.

Click Here to see a video of meteorologist Anthony Watts explaining the false temperature readings.

Here are where the official temperature reading sensors at the Eureka, CA. National Weather Service Office are placed.

These temperature stations have several problems. They are located right next to a heat radiating asphalt driveway.  They are also placed directly above a bed of crushed rocks which acts like a heat sink that radiates heat upwards towards them. Yet these are where the "OFFICIAL" temperatures are taken by the National Weather Service!

There are literally hundreds of temperature monitoring stations that are in places that give higher temperature readings than the surrounding area would normally have if they were properly placed.

As my first computer professor taught me, garbage data in leads to garbage data out.

Many of these temperature readings are simply wrong, VERY wrong.

Here are some other examples:

This sensor is 9 feet away from a
very hot air conditioner.
This sensor is just a few away from
another air conditioner.
This temperature sensor is directly
in the path of a super hot jet engine.

The National Weather Service has established standards for equipment, siting, and exposure.
This is the quote from their rule book:

"Temperature sensor siting: The sensor should be mounted 5 feet +/- 1 foot above the ground. 
The ground over which the shelter [radiation] is located should be typical of the surrounding area. A level, open clearing is desirable so the thermometers are freely ventilated by air flow. 

Do not install the sensor on a steep slope or in a sheltered hollow unless it is typical of the area or unless data from that type of site are desired. When possible, the shelter should be no closer than four times the height of any obstruction (tree, fence, building, etc.). 
The sensor should be at least 100 feet from any paved or concrete surface."

Clearly, these rules are not being followed. If that is the case how can these temperature readings be considered accurate?



 
Napa State Hospital Temperature Monitor

This sensor is less than 10 feet from a hot air conditioner exhaust, a car exhaust and the asphalt pavement!

EVERY ONE of these temperature stations are placed in areas too close to heat producing devices according to the rules set by NOAA.  Yet this is where the "OFFICIAL" data is being collected that they claim "proves" Global Warming is occurring.

This is just like the false data that the polar caps are getting warmer.

Guess what? Antarctica's getting colder, not warmer!

New Research Indicates the Earth May Be Cooling



Detroit Lakes, Minnesota

This picture is from the "official" climate station in Detroit Lakes MN. This station is located right behind a building. These temperature records are recorded by a man named Don Kitsch who gathers up almost all the temperature readings for the entire state of Minnesota!  This is the data given to both NASA and NOAA from which they issue their official temperature reports.

How can this "official" temperature sensor POSSIBLY get an accurate reading after being placed so close to the outputs of two very large air conditioner exhausts?

The records from this station claimed that 1998-2006 were the hottest years on record. 
Isn't it interesting that this temperature sensor was moved right next to these two air conditioner units on that year?

NASA has just recently corrected itself about when the hottest years on record were.  According to the new corrected data published by NASA, 1998 was no longer the hottest year ever. 1934 was!

Four of the top 10 years of US CONUS high temperature deviations are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well below the leader board, behind even 1900.
In a recent Global Warming scare story by Newsweek they completely ignored this new data!

NASA Corrects 120 Years Worth of Bad Data.

If the Global warming crowd is basing their arguments on fraction of degree increases, and the data given to them was off, even by one degree, how can their argument possibly stand up?
If they ignore this data, and they do, their "computer models" of  "Global Warming" MUST be wrong!

AL Gore uses a phony computer "model", based upon the OLD temperature readings, and then he has the nerve to exaggerate it's effect by 20 times!  Al Gores "science" is truly laughable.

Al Gore does NOT use this corrected graph of temperature readings in his computer models.

Al Gore's hockey stick graph is WRONG!

Click Here to see a video clip on why
Al Gore's hockey stick chart is WRONG!


One of the most obscenely flagrant violations examples of the temperature monitoring station rules can be seen in Tucson, AZ at the University of Arizona where the sensor is placed directly on a heat reflecting asphalt parking lot.  Yet this is one of the places where they contend the greatest rise in temperature has occurred!  These pictures say it all.


How about the official temperature gauges in Lewis Maine?  They are too close to the pavement, the stone steps, the air conditioning unit, and even a barbecue grill!

Here are some more National Weather Service "official temperature sensors" placed right in the path of high heat producing air conditioning units.

Hopkinsville, KY.
Concord, California

This is the US Climate Reference Network site in East port Maine.
Could it possibly be a bit too close to the massive heat producing air conditioner?

How about this sensor in Forest Grove, Oregon? The picture below is from Oregon State Climatologist George Taylor.  You may have heard of him because the Governor of Oregon tried to get him fired for not jumping on to the global warming bandwagon because he didn't see enough supporting evidence.

Think this official temperature sensor located in Lovesick, Nevada
is getting an accurate reading right in the path of a jet engine?!!!

There's literally hundreds of "official" temperature gathering stations in places where they should not be.  I may even have to start a new web page just to show them all.

I thought this one was particularly humorous.  Besides being too close to a structure (a private home no less!), a vehicle's exhaust, and a heat radiating asphalt street, I wonder how accurate the data is after the sensor has been whacked by an errant basketball a few hundred times?!!!

Even the Pug dog in the lower left hand corner knows something is terribly wrong here!
Could it be that even he is smarter than Al Gore?


 
This folks, is the OFFICIAL SCIENTIFIC DATA that Al Gore uses to predict the worlds catastrophic end! 

Be afraid, be VERY afraid of AL GORE!


 

The Failed Kyoto Treaty

If Global Warming is so important why didn't Bill Clinton sign The Kyoto Treaty?
Why did AL Gore himself advise AGAINST the United States signing the treaty?

It's important to note that 80% of the European nations who signed the Kyoto Treaty have FAILED to meet their nations quotas as outlined in the agreement they signed. Hypocrites!
In fact many of the leaders who signed this agreement knew ahead of time that their countries would not meet their specified goals!

Here is more of Al Gore's inconvenient truth 
when he tells us NOT to sign the Kyoto Treaty
when he was in office.
Click Here to see the video.
Click Here to see Al Gore say we should NOT sign Kyoto when HE was in office!

Envirowackos are now protesting wind powered energy because birds and bats could possibly be hurt.  Robert Kennedy Jr., one of the countries leading Envirowackos, opposes the windmill farm off of Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Along with the "damage to our environment" he's worried that the companies who set up these farms would make money on them.

No, Mr. Kennedy, companies who will invest countless millions of dollars should not make a penny on their investment!  That's just fine for filthy rich people like YOUR FAMILY who owns a cadre of oil wells!!!
But the rest of us have energy needs, for which you have no realistic solution to, and the rest of us have no problem with companies making profits from their investments. That's called capitalism.

That is why YOU have a multi million dollar trust fund, Mr. Kennedy, because of Capitalism which is not a dirty word.

Meanwhile your brother, Senator Ted Kennedy, is OPPOSED to building windmills that create zero pollution.

Is there ANY realistic form of energy the wacko-environmentalists will approve of?
Not that I can find.




The Road To Bali

Here is a piece by Peter Foster about the recent Bali Conference where Kyoto was discussed.
Here's a section of the article that tells the TRUTH about the Kyoto Treaty.

"Bali will see nothing but posturing and preening, "tough" negotiations, and an agreement to talk further, in yet more exotic locations. 
But we should remember that the object of the exercise is NOT to deal practically with the problems of poverty, or to realistically address the challenges of extreme weather, whether caused by humans or otherwise.

Bjorn Lomborg has eloquently pointed out why Kyoto-style approaches represent a very poor return on investment, and why we would be much better to deal directly with the specific threats of drought, flooding, malaria or hurricane damage, and with the broader issue of how to promote development. 

But that criticism misses the real significance of Kyoto and KyoTwo.
They are not about effectively addressing specific problems, they are about exploiting ignorance about climate science, and continuing to demonize capitalism, in order to make ecocrats feel good, make others feel bad, pad incomes, and expand travel schedules.

Democratic governments have no choice but to cater to the ignorance/alarm/hypocrisy engendered in their electorates.

Bali is NOT about climate; it symbolizes the continued assault on freedom by those who seek -- or pander to -- political power under the guise of concern for humanity."

It's all about making environmentalist politicians feel good about themselves, while bending to the will, and gaining praises from an uneducated public after years of being unknowingly indoctrinated by the leftist media's whose goal is to simply tear down the worlds most successful countries (The United States) and fleece them of whatever money they can.

Read:
The Road To Bali

While hundreds of journalists were allowed to attend and report upon the Kyoto "Conference of the Parties" in December of 2007 it's interesting to note that several organizations such as representatives of Environment & Climate News, who are a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research organization, as well as other journalists who question the existence of Global Warming were REFUSED press credentials to cover the event.

Once again ANYONE who even dares to question Global Warming is shut out.
Debate, or even questions are NOT ALLOWED!

Yeah, that's how real science works!

These people are normal!
You idiots, your climate mandates will INCREASE  global poverty!

At the Bali conference, the UN’s main climate change official, 
Yvo de Boer,  got so upset that he burst into tears while addressing the conference!
The World Meteorological Organization claimed that 2007 had been one of the 10 hottest years on record, as were eight other years in the past decade.

But that data is apparently flawed and disputed by a number of climate scientists so Mr. Yvo de Boer, decided to pull what every child does when the cant win an argument, he had a tantrum!
I guess the TRUTH was a little too much for him to handle!

I think he was just crying because he knows how hard it's going to be to steal money from the  United States for his phony cause in the future as his "science" falls apart.
But he shouldn't be too upset. They have already stolen millions from the worlds economy to help solve Global Warming. And boy, you can really feel it too with those subzero temperatures in the Midwest!!!

I wonder exactly what they will spend this money on to solve the problem?!
I figure they'll use it to find MORE ways to tax us!!!

Yvo de Boer
The crying
environmentalist!


According to the former science editor of the BBC, David Whitehouse in the reputable British journal New Statesman that global warming has stopped, should be taken very seriously by the world's climate science community.  An article in that journal saying that the global temperature of 2007 is statistically the same as 2006 as well as every year since 2001 is the basis for his claim that global warming has stopped has created quite a serious problem for those who believe than manmade greenhouse gases cause global warming. 

This is not what the climate models predicted. However it is in line with recent research and radiosonde data that fails to show the heating of the upper atmosphere that identifies warming by greenhouse gases. So we need to know why the models failed to predict that warming would stop and why they predict an upper atmosphere warming that is not happening.

Read the story HERE.
and HERE.



Any doubts about the fact that the whole climate change issue is being mishandled by governments have been reinforced by Professor David Henderson, former head of the Economic Unit of OECD, now a visiting professor at Westminster University, whose recent illuminating address to the American Institute for Economic Research, which can be found on the web site": http://www.climatescience.org.nz




The Heartland Institute is a national nonprofit research and education organization, founded in Chicago in 1984. It is not affiliated with any political party, business, or foundation.

They have many great links about the Great Global Warming Hoax.


 

UN Rejects Press Credentials for Representatives of US Newspaper

U.N. Blackballs International Scientists from Climate Change Conference

United Nations Climate Change Conference in Bali Hijacked by European Liberals

Professor Spreads False Global Warming Stories

Antarctic Sea Ice Sets Records in October 2007

Everything Is Caused by Global Warming (600+ links)

Anatomy of a Fake Consensus


The Faked Polar Bear Photo

Remember that wonderful picture of the stranded polar bears on an ice flow that were used by folks like Al Gore to demonstrate how dire the man-made global warming issue is?

It turns out the picture was taken in August, “when every year the fringes of the Arctic ice cap melt regardless of the wider effects of global warming.”

Read the full story HERE about this FAKE!


The Polar Bear Picture
They Won't Show You

Let's get the children involved to play on our EMOTIONS!
Click Here to hear the kids plead for the Polar Bears!
It's all about the EMOTION and NOT about the SCIENCE.
Save the Polar Bears Mommy!!!

Polar Bear populations are on the rise!
Polar Bear Baby Boom Occurring in Eastern Arctic

Have a party boys, Al Gore's full of penguin dung!



Global Warming is Junk Science that is costing the world trillions of dollars.
Click Here to see the Kyoto Treaty cost meter.

Since coming into effect February 16, 2005, the Kyoto Protocol has cost at least
$356,243,888,156.00!

The potential temperature saving by the year 2050 so far achieved by Kyoto is an undetectable
 0.003698321 °C!

Grab a glass and drink the Kool-Aid kids!


The Cooling World

People forget that back in the early 1970', before they ever dreamed up this global warming scam, many scientists were saying that they were SURE that the Earth was cooling and that we were headed into another Ice Age!  When I was in high school they taught us that another Ice Age was about to begin. This was reported by Newsweek.

Global Cooling -- Newsweek Magazine .pdf file

Washington D.C. resident John Lockwood was conducting research at the Library of Congress and came across an intriguing Page 2 headline in the Nov. 2, 1922 edition of The Washington Post: "Arctic Ocean Getting Warm; Seals Vanish and Icebergs Melt."

The 1922 article, obtained by Inside the Beltway, goes on to mention "great masses of ice have now been replaced by moraines of earth and stones," and "at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared."

Before Al Gore Discovered Global Warming


Fire and Ice

Journalists have warned of climate change for 100 years,
but can't decide weather we face an ice age or warming.

It's all about the media hysteria that seems to run in a 30 year cycle. 
First we're headed towards another Ice age, then it's back to the planet heating up.
Over and over again the media thrives on a crisis. The latest Global Warming hysteria is just another example of this.

This isn't a question of science. It's a question of whether Americans can trust what the media tell them about science. Just look at the different positions the New York Times have taken over the years.  Why is it that they can't seem to make up their minds?  Critics will say "But we 're so much smarter today, now we have more evidence".  But with the temperature readings so obviously corrupted how is the science better today?

Twenty years from now they will say say we were so stupid back then and that
we should have known the pending Ice age was coming again!


Scientist Charles Dumas states that:
"The proposed Kyoto treaty limits would in no way prevent global warming."

"Global Warming" may end up costing the worlds economy 45% of world gross domestic product.
For something that may not even exist!


We are in an increased period of high activity on the Sun right now where it is hotter than ever.

This activity would far surpass whatever man could do on this planet.

But liberals don't want you to know about this, they simply want to BLAME AMERICA!

Global Warming from Increased Sunspots

But the main source of greenhouse gasses, what the Envirowackos claim is causing global warming, is NOT the use of fossil fuels, it is because of WATER VAPOR!

WATER VAPOR in the CLIMATE SYSTEM 

Seasons of the Sun

Sun to Blame for Global Warming

It's the Sun that's to blame - not man


According to Harvard University:

20th Century Climate Not So Hot

Cambridge, MA - A review of more than 200 climate studies led by researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics has determined that the 20th century is neither the warmest century nor the century with the most extreme weather of the past 1000 years.

The review also confirmed that the Medieval Warm Period of 800 to 1300 A.D. and the Little Ice Age of 1300 to 1900 A.D. were worldwide phenomena not limited to the European and North American continents. 

"While 20th century temperatures are much higher than in the Little Ice Age period, many parts of the world show the medieval warmth to be greater than that of the 20th century."

Read the entire press release HERE.


Al Gore's hockey stick chart is WRONG!

Al Gore's hockey stick graph is a spurious propaganda tool, a nobrainer to persuade people into
believing in the correlation/causation between CO2 and global temperatures.

Scientific Fact
Al Gore's Hockey Stick Fiction

 
Click Here to see a video clip on why
Al Gore's hockey stick chart is WRONG!

Click Here to see a larger image.

Al Gore's "hockey stick graph", 
may be the most contested example of 
information visualization in the history of science.

The hockey stick graph is NOT debunkable,
but Leprechauns are also not debunkable!


 
Click Here to see a video of two prominent climate scientists discus why Al Gore's hockey stick graph based on carbon dioxide levels is completely wrong.

This video takes about a minute to load so please give it a little time to do so.

AL Gore's CO2 conclusions are WRONG!

Ancient Greenland
Was Actually Green!
Ker Than
Live Science Staff Writer
LiveScience.com 
Thursday July 5, 2007
The oldest ever recovered DNA samples have been collected from under more than a mile of Greenland ice, and their analysis suggests the island was much warmer during the last Ice Age than previously thought. 

The DNA is proof that sometime between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, much of Greenland was especially green and covered in a boreal forest that was home to alder, spruce and pine trees, as well as insects such as butterflies and beetles. 

From the genetic material of these organisms, the researchers infer that Greenland's temperature once varied from 50 degrees Fahrenheit in summer to 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit in winter the temperature range that the tree species prefer. 

“We have shown for the first time that southern Greenland … was once very different to the Greenland we see today,” said study leader Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen."


But wait a minute! Al Gore has stated that the Earth has not been this warm in close to a million years. This directly contradicts what Gore and the other Global Warming "experts" have said.

Yet we now have actual PROOF (not just the bogus computer "models" Gore uses) from these ice core samples, that Greenland was much warmer than it is today. 
In An Inconvenient Truth Al Gore uses ice core samples to make his point. So why are these ice core samples, which contradict Gore's conclusions, ignored?

This is the actual scientific PROOF that Al Gore and RFK Jr. are unwilling to debate.  Why is that?

Even the liberal New York Times reported on March 13, 2007 in an article on concerns among some scientists about the tone and the accuracy of the film, noting that they "argue that some of Mr. Gore's central points are exaggerated and erroneous".  They comment on his claim that the seas will rise over 20 feet as "beyond ridiculous and simply an outright lie as far as all scientific evidence shows us today".

The Inconvenient Times 
A surprise for New York Times subscribers: 
a report that perhaps the "central points" of Al Gore's movie are "exaggerated and erroneous."


The documentary film The Great Global Warming Swindle, broadcast on Channel 4 in the UK on March 8, 2007, brought together skeptical scientists who disagree with the prevailing consensus regarding human caused global warming.

The film claims that in Al Gore's movie, An Inconvenient Truth, Gore has misrepresented the data, and that the actual relationship between carbon dioxide and the temperature is completely the other way round, that is, the rise in temperature itself causes an increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

They off proof and charts to this assertion just like Gore does.

Yet Gore still insists that it is CO2 that makes the Earth's temperature to rise, and of course, once again he REFUSES to even debate it.

When Albert Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity he spent his ENTIRE LIFE trying to disprove the theory just to make sure it was correct.

That's the way REAL scientists work.

They come up with a theory and then debate it to try to disprove it to make sure that it is real.

They don't do what Al Gore does which is to tell us "The debate is OVER, it is time to act".

How does Gore want to act?  He wants to tax Americans for their use of fossil fuels.

This "carbon tax" would, of course, raise the price of gasoline and the cost of home heating and cooling.

In April, CNBC Squawk Box anchor Joe Kernen famously interviewed Gore sycophants Laurie David and singer Sheryl Crow about global warming.  In addition to refusing to respond to Kernen’s repeated questions about the underlying science of global warming, Laurie David contemptuously reiterated Al Gore's mantra, “The debate is over.”


To be called science, theories must stand up under a process called ‘The Scientific Method.’ 

Three steps are involved:

  • One, observe a phenomenon. 
  • Two, devise a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon. 
  • Three, devise a test to prove or disprove the hypothesis.
If the third step proves it, you have a scientific truth. 

Every global warming theory I have read stops at step 2.

Most pro Global Warming people think the hypothesis must be true, so it is true, end of story.

That makes Global Warming a RELIGION and NOT a scientific fact which can be proven.

If an 8th grader gave this global warming "evidence" to his science teacher in the 60's he would have been given a failing grade and a lesson to how to accurately perform a controlled experiment.

Global Warming is supported by such a selective, narrow set of "facts" that it is laughable.

It ignores entire sets of other real facts that can prove that the earth isn't warming at all.

And even is Global Warming is truly happening why isn't being blamed on the fact that all tests prove that the Sun is getting hotter, and that there is "global warming" on Mars and Venus most likely caused by the Sun?

Because the religion of global warming wants to blame man and the environmental sinner who must be punished then saved.


 
Ethanol is IMMORAL!

Al Gore, the Greenie Weenies, and the media want you to believe that Ethanol, made form corn or sugar is the best solution to our pollution and energy problems.

Once again, the Envirowackos couldn't be MORE wrong!


There are so many problems with Ethanol it's not funny. 
While it can be used as a fuel, it turns out there is NO cost savings, energy savings, or environmental savings from it.

Producing Ethanol uses MORE energy
than it creates!

It also creates MORE air pollution and environmental damage than oil does.  

It is also INCREASING starvation all over the world.
That is IMMORAL!

CLICK HERE to see the
Ethanol Myths video clip.

Ethanol: The Political Fuel

CLICK HERE to see Ethanol Myths video clip.
CLICK HERE to see Ethanol Myths video clip.

Ethanol production is driving worldwide food prices sky high. 

Corn is used in thousands of food products and that will make the costs of almost every food go up. It is estimated that 90% of Americans use a corn based product everyday.

Corn is also used as grain to feed chickens and cattle.

Think about it, not only will it cost us Americans more for food, but it's going to cost the poorest people of the world more for food.  That's nothing but cruel and IMMORAL!

Growing corn and sugar for Ethanol has become a big business.
The problem it is costing us all a lot more money, and starving people all over the world.

Is it really worth the cost?
Ethanol and the Calculation Issue 

Is Ethanol worth the cost?

Ethanol is now causing MORE starvation around the world with the poorest among us being the hardest hit. Average Mexicans will end up spending up to a third of their total income on tortillas a main staple of food in Mexico. CLICK HERE to read more about this.

In Mexico the rising cost corn has driven up the cost of of tortillas that has caused protests from thousands of people. CLICK HERE to read the story.

The corn or sugar used to make Ethanol also takes a lot of fertilizer, and clean water to make it grow. As environmentalists will tell you (true or not) the Earth is running dangerously low of fresh water. 

In fact they say that it is Global Warming itself that is depleting the worlds fresh water supplies.
But one of the solutions they propose is using Ethanol which needs massive amounts of water to produce.  Their solutions are actually contradicting themselves! 

I just love it when the Envirowackos can't agree with each other!

It takes 450 pounds of corn to produce the ethanol to fill only ONE SUV tank. 
That's enough corn to feed one person for a YEAR! It's no wonder why food prices are rising.
Plus, it takes more than one gallon of fossil fuel -- oil and natural gas -- to produce one gallon of ethanol. It also takes 1,800 gallons of water to produce ONE gallon of ethanol!

Big Corn and The Ethanol Hoax

Growing corn for fuel is using a lot more water, driving water prices up, and causing more water shortages around the world. In the August 2007 issue of the journal Human Ecology, it suggested that more WARS may occur over the shortages of water, and the shortages and high prices of food in the world.
They say that historically this has been the case in the past.

Fertilizer costs are also rising making EVERY crop more expensive to grow. That leads to even higher food prices.  And the herbicides and pesticides necessary to grow corn at an industrial scale leach toxins into the groundwater.  Once again, it's the poorest of the poor who are being affected by this the most.

Outside the U.S., rapidly growing demand for ethanol could worsen hunger in developing countries.
Using more corn crops for fuel puts more pressure on supply and demand, raising the cost of food.

Despite the huge, taxpayer supported agricultural subsidies, the prices of corn — and tortillas — have been climbing rapidly causing shortages in the poorest parts of Mexico.

Greg Page, president and chief operating officer of Cargill Inc., a leading ethanol producer said;
"We as leaders should be asking, "What prices are we prepared to make the world's poor pay for food?".

The Envirowackos don't REALLY care about the worlds poor people starving to death.  All they care about is making a political statement about the imaginary effects of "Global Warming" to make themselves feel like they are doing something to help the Earth, when the TRUTH is that they will be making problems worse.

Ethanol Demands Could Raise Food Prices

I was in the supermarket recently and there was a flyer placed over the milk aisle explaining why milk prices were rising.  The U.S, current prices are higher than ever at $3.80 a gallon.

THAT'S HIGHER THAN THE PRICE OF GASOLINE!

Where's the Congressional investigation of the dairy farmers for high prices of milk?
How come they aren't being investigated for "excessive profits" like the oil industry is?

I recently paid $7.00 for a gallon of orange juice. That's more than DOUBLE than the price of gasoline!
Because of the cold temperatures (what happened to the warming?) much of this years orange crop has been lost.  Why isn't Hillary Clinton investigating the orange growers "excessive profits"?
 
 

Corn feed costs are rising because of the mandate for Ethanol and that's driving Milk, Cheese, Butter, Ice Cream and many other types of food prices sky high.

Expect Milk Prices To Rise

Click Here to see the video

Click Here to see
how Ethanol is causing
milk prices to rise.
Click Here to see how Ethanol is causing food prices to rise.

In my state we are FORCED to have 10% Ethanol in our gasoline. Ever since this FORCED change I've been using high test premium gasoline instead of regular to get the same performance from my engine in my nice new car.

I DO notice the difference.  Meanwhile, our taxes are being used to subsidize this losing proposition.

I want back my FREE CHOICE of whether to use regular gasoline or an Ethanol blend that I know is more corrosive to my engine.  Which, of course, will cause me to buy a new car sooner, which is going to cause more damage to the environment.  Can you hear me banging my head against the wall?  No?  It must be because of the loud knocking of my engine from putting that crap into it!

Congress has now MANDATED (meaning they have taken away your FREEDOM of choice) the use of Ethanol in it's 2007 Energy Bill, which, of course, doesn't create ANY new energy at all, it only says that we should use less. A great solution for a growing country.

To create Ethanol they must also use Natural Gas in it's production thereby wasting even MORE energy. Scientists are now estimating that it takes 30% MORE energy to create the Ethanol than the energy the Ethanol creates!

Did you Global Warming fools get that?  100% of the energy created by Ethanol costs 130% in other forms of energy to create the Ethanol, which is MORE polluting that other types of energy.

This is only slightly less stupid than buying oil from terrorists rather than drilling our own oil here in the United States!


This article, says there is a "slight swelling and blistering on the carburetor and an increase in carbon deposits on pistons."  Wait a minute here!  MORE Carbon?!!!
I thought Ethanol was supposed to have LESS Carbon?  If it's on the pistons it MUST be going through the exhaust also!

The article goes on to say that 20% blend of Ethanol in gasoline causes "substantial problems" in engines.  Some people say that we can simply use newer engines that can handle the Ethanol.  Then what happens with all the old engines?  What about vintage cars? What about lower income people who can't afford new engines? Will they be stuck with problem engines? 

Maybe we can just raise taxes on the rich and buy EVERYBODY a new car!!!
Sounds like another SOCIALIST solution to me!

Ethanol damage to engines confirmed
 

The article is self explanatory:

Protect Your Outboard Engine from
Damage Due to Ethanol Blend Fuels:

Now we have to PROTECT our engines from Ethanol?!
Just look at all you have to now do to protect your engine from Ethanol damage.


Ethanol is costing about $1.75 cents a gallon.  Not bad you say?
Let's think about the REALITY of the situation. Ethanol is being subsidized by MILLIONS of your YOUR tax dollars, because they can't actually make any money with it, so the cost is much more than you realize.
We are all paying to LOOSE money with this bad idea.

Gasoline is being taxed at a rate of 75 cents to $1.50 per gallon or more in the United States. Add that tax onto the actual prices of Ethanol and it will actually cost MORE than gasoline!  Don't think that LIBERAL politicians taxing will stop taxing ANY form of energy in this country.  Some states now even tax windmills and solar panels!

Ethanol cannot be sent through pipelines like oil can. This is a complicated issue that can be read about HERE. This is a HUGE problem to overcome.

Since it can't be sent by pipelines that means that Ethanol must be trucked to reach filling stations.  That means MUCH MORE fuel use just to get the fuel, which uses more fuel, in fact at least 35% MORE fuel, to create Ethanolas the energy it produces for us. This is resulting in a net LOSS of energy because of the use of Ethanol.

So, in reality, Ethanol is polluting, and costing MORE than oil.  Meanwhile, Congress is MANDATING that we subsidize it with our tax dollars.

This is only slightly less stupid than doing what we do now which is to buy oil from terrorist supporting nations, WHEN WE HAVE OUR OWN OIL THAT WE COULD DRILL RIGHT HERE IN THE UNITED STATES!

The idiocy of all this is mind boggling.

While we have billions of gallons of untapped oil, and untold megawatts of electricity available to us from Nuclear power, the sustainability of using biofuels such as Ethanol

The question of sustainability arises when we consider that ethanol from corn can't possibly be grown forever because growing corn depletes the soil even if sustainable farming methods such as crop rotation are used. Some researchers argue that ethanol production from corn could wear out the soil within 30 years.  Then we will be without energy AND without food!

A recent story by the AP stated that Ethanol is great solution because it is cheaper than gasoline.
A bit further down in the story they revealed the truth of that statement by adding that it was government subsidies (your tax dollars) that made it that way.


Ethanol has been shown to damage engines partially because it is water soluble, and has the ability to pick up water, and that corrodes engines and pipelines.

Another new problem is that the Environmental Protection Agency is now saying the burning of Ethanol is causing MORE pollution, and that it causes Carbon Monoxide and carcinogens "many times greater" than they promised.  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are being released by the ethanol plants include formaldehyde and acetic acid, both carcinogens

The fumes are produced when fermented corn mash is dried for sale as a supplement for livestock feed. Devices known as thermal oxidizers can be attached to the plants to burn off the dangerous gases.  Yet Congress is forcing states to produce more Ethanol!

EPA Finds Worrisome Levels Of Toxic Air Pollutants At Ethanol Plants

Ethanol Pollution Worse than Gasoline?

EPA says ethanol plants are releasing volatile organics, carbon monoxide

Study: Ethanol Worse for Climate Than Gasoline

There is also another serious problem with Ethanol

Remember when Sting and all the other environmentalists warned us about cutting down the rain forests?  They told us without the rain forests in South America the planet would die very soon.

So what's happening in South American countries like Brazil today? 
Farmers are cutting down the forests in order to grow corn and sugar for Ethanol!

Farmland in Brazil is being burned, in preparation for planting corn and beans. A new study finds that ethanol production drives such land clearing,  is contributing greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. 

So the forests are disappearing at a FASTER rate than they were before. Local water supplies are being used up and food prices are climbing.

Is Ethanol worth the cost?
Is Ethanol worth the cost?

 
Noted ecologist and primate scientist Jane Goodall says biofuel crops are hurting the rain forests.

She says the race to grow crops for vehicle fuels is damaging rain forests in Asia, Africa, and South America, and adding to the emissions blamed for global warming.

Is Ethanol worth the cost?

Critics say that the demand for the fuels has led companies to cut down and burn forests in order to grow the crops, adding to heat trapping emissions and leading to erosion and stress on ecosystems. "Biofuel isn't the answer to everything" says Goodall.

Jane Goodall says biofuel crops hurt rain forests.

After the corn and sugar is picked the South American farmers then burn the dried out crops so that it will make cheaper fertilizer for growing the new crop and cause them less work in removing the old growth. Sometimes they burn the fields before they pick the sugar. It doesn't hurt the cane and it increases the concentration of the sugar.

This creates MASSIVE amounts of air pollution.  This pollution situation is so bad that the pollution is now causing respiratory illnesses in OTHER COUNTRIES than the ones growing the crops for Ethanol!   Doesn't all this just make you want to bang your head against the wall?!!!

 This ia an actual picture of the burning of the sugar cane fields in Brazil.
Does this look environmentally friendly to you?

Some of these fires are so large that they can be seen by 
LANDSAT images from satellites.



 
 
 

Even the EXTREME FAR LEFT New York Times columnist, the ferret-like 
Paul Krugman, a TRULY anti-American weasel, agrees that Ethanol and Biofuels are a losing proposition, then you know it must be true!
It takes a LOT for a LIberal to admit when they are wrong!

Grains Gone Wild - The Biofuel SCAM!


 

Lets go over the facts again just so we all understand them:

  • Ethanol uses as much energy to produce it as the energy it makes. There is NO savings in money or in environmental damage in using Ethanol.
  • Ethanol costs you MORE money because the government has to subsidize it with YOUR tax dollars.
  • Ethanol causes worldwide food prices to rise, sometimes dramatically, affecting the poorest people we have and possibly even starving them to death.
  • Ethanol uses massive amounts of fresh water to produce and will cause many more shortages of fresh water all over the world.
  • Ethanol costs more to ship because it cannot be sent through normal pipelines.
  • Ethanol use is creating even more deadly toxins and carcinogens such as Carbon Monoxide and formaldehyde.
  • Ethanol production is causing the destruction of the rain forests to grow corn and sugar cane.
  • Ethanol is causing high amounts of respiratory illnesses by increasing air pollution by the burning of used corn and sugar fields.
  • Ethanol can cause damage in normal engines and it's being FORCED upon us and we have NO CHOICE if we want it in our gasoline or not as Congress has mandated it's use.


Ethanol is a REALLY bad idea!


 
Compact Florescent Light Bulbs
Are DANGEROUS!
Those compact florescent light bulbs that all the ENVIROWACKOS claim will "Save The Planet" (Give me a BREAK!) contain deadly MERCURY. These bulbs, when broken, as thrown into a landfill or incinerated, will spread deadly MERCURY all over our planet.

Environmental cleanup teams have been called in to clean up such messes and new regulations are now being made for the disposal of these bulbs.  The United States Congress has BANNED the incandescent light bulb and is FORCING us all to use these dangerous lightbulbs.
Just another example of Congress taking away MORE of our FREEDOM.


Take a look at this video which explains how these bulbs are toxic and how they must be disposed of so that the Mercury doesn't leech into our groundwater and food.  Then they tell us it will be OK if we recycle them.
But they fail to mention take recycling requires lots of energy use which negates the entire concept of energy conservation!
They also don't mention where they put all the toxic Mercury.
Click Here to see the video.
Click Here to see why CFL's are TOXIC!!!

From a recent news story:  "Maybe it is the mercury inside those fluorescent bulbs that give some of us pause. If you were to break one, you've just created some hazardous waste right in the comfort of your own home. 

A broken fluorescent bulb will immediately release dangerous mercury into the air. And the initial discomfort of exposure to that mercury - dizziness and nausea - are the least of your concerns. 

Breathing in that stuff can cause lifelong damage to the central nervous system and should be avoided.  If you are convinced that fluorescent is the way to go, there are some ways to minimize your risk of exposure to mercury from a broken bulb. 

Toxicology experts say the first thing you should do if you break one is to leave the room IMMEDIATELY!
Take the kids and the pets with you and don't come back for at least fifteen minutes. 
After the air has cleared, you can begin cleaning up the mess, but don't break out the vacuum cleaner. 
Instead, wear rubber gloves and sweep it into a plastic bag. Seal the bag and dispose of it as you would any other hazardous waste. Then take the broken bulb to a HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY.

If one of these bulbs burns out you still cannot throw it into the regular trash because at some point it will be broken in the movement and disposal of that trash. In ANY condition the compact florescent light bulb is considered HAZARDOUS WASTE!

Purdue University scientist John Fenemore states that in "in 20 years it may turn out that switching to fluorescent light bulbs could greatly increase the amount of mercury in our living environment.  The amount of mercury in our food may increase 500% or more.  Fish may become unsafe to eat at all.  These florescent light bulbs may turn out to be one of the greatest man made human catastrophes we've every created on this planet WITH NO WAY TO CLEAN IT UP!"
 

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends
the following guidelines for dealing with a broken CFL bulb:

What to Do if a Fluorescent Light Bulb Breaks.

Fluorescent light bulbs contain a very small amount of mercury sealed within the glass tubing. EPA recommends the following clean-up and disposal guidelines: 

Open a window and leave the room (restrict access) for at least 15 minutes.

Remove all materials you can without using a vacuum cleaner.

Wear disposable rubber gloves, if available (do not use your bare hands).

Carefully scoop up the fragments and powder with stiff paper or cardboard.

Wipe the area clean with a damp paper towel or disposable wet wipe. 

Sticky tape (such as duct tape) can be used to pick up small pieces and powder.

Place all cleanup materials in a plastic bag and seal it.

If your state permits you to put used or broken fluorescent light bulbs in the garbage, seal the bulb in two plastic bags and put into the outside trash (if no other disposal or recycling options are available).

Wash your hands after disposing of the bag.

The first time you vacuum the area where the bulb was broken, remove the vacuum bag once done cleaning the area (or empty and wipe the canister) and put the bag and/or vacuum debris, as well as the cleaning materials, in two sealed plastic bags in the outdoor trash or protected outdoor location for normal disposal. 


The State of Maine now has it's own recommendations:

What if it breaks?
The most important thing to remember is to never use a vacuum. A standard vacuum will spread mercury containing dust throughout the area as well as potentially contaminating the vacuum.

What you should do is:

Keep people and pets away from the breakage area so that the mercury in the powder inside the bulb is not accidentally tracked into other areas. 

Ventilate the area by opening windows. 

If possible, reduce the temperature. 

Wear appropriate personal protective equipment, such as rubber gloves, safety glasses, old clothing or coveralls, and a dust mask (if you have one) to keep bulb dust and glass from being inhaled. 

Carefully remove the larger pieces and place them in a secure closed container or airtight plastic bag. 

Next, begin collecting the smaller pieces and dust. You can do this using a disposable broom and dustpan or two stiff pieces of paper to scoop up the pieces. 

Put all material into the container or airtight plastic bag. Pat the area with the sticky side of duct, packing or masking tape. Wipe the area with a damp cloth or paper towels to pick up fine particles. 

Put all waste and materials used to clean up the bulb in the secure closed container or airtight plastic bag and label it “Universal Waste - broken lamp”. 

Take the container for recycling as universal waste. See proper recycling information above. 

All this for one broken bulb they claim will "Save The Planet"?
Ridiculous!!

From a recent article:

"Last month, Brandy Bridges, a Prospect, Maine, resident went out and bought two dozen CFL's and began installing them in her home. One broke. A month later, her daughter's bedroom remains sealed off with plastic like the site of a hazardous materials accident, while Bridges works on a way to pay off a $2,000 estimate by a company specializing in environmentally sound cleanups of the mercury inside the bulb"

Push for energy saving fluorescents ignores mercury disposal hazards

New Compact Light Bulbs Hold Environmental Hazard


Here are a couple of points to think about before you decide that buying these bulbs will
"save the planet."

They claim these bulbs save energy.  Why is that?  Because they produce more light and don't "waste" all that electricity creating heat instead of light.

But what if it's winter and you're heating your home? 
That heat isn't being wasted AT ALL!!!


It's dissipating into your room, warming it up, and therefore you'll need less of your regular HVAC heat to heat your home! 
Just ask any 10 year old with an EZ bake oven!

That point NEVER makes it into to these pinheads brains! 
The LIBERAL MEDIA will also NEVER mention that fact either!

In another step to take away our personnel FREEDOM, Congress has now voted to BAN the 100 watt incandescent light bulb.

They are actually making it a CRIME to sell one!  Unbelievable!

Bye Bye, Light Bulb 


Another point, most of these florescent light bulbs are being manufactured in China
China is one of the most blatant polluters in the world. They use old dirty coal technology to create much of their energy.  So the energy being used to create these bulbs is very dirty, and polluting the environment. China is also not very careful about handling toxic chemicals. Since they are putting dangerous Mercury in these bulbs I wonder how much is escaping and polluting the land there?

China is now the worlds largest greenhouse gas emitter.  It's increasing by a dramatic rate there.

My nephew lives in Shanghai and he tells me the air pollution in China is simply unbelievable.

Recently it has been reported that soon 3/4 of the air pollution on our West Coast will come from China.  Yet China has NO interest in signing Kyoto.  But Al Gore blames America FIRST.
Why doesn't he send his silly little COMMIE light bulbs over there?!!!

Hey Al, your Global Warming hasn't hit here yet. It's freezing outside!  I think I'm going to heat my entire house with old fashioned, Thomas Edison incandescent light bulbs!


Energy saving light bulbs blamed for migraines

Low energy bulbs can trigger migraine, seizures and pain

Low energy light bulbs "can trigger epilepsy"

New warnings for compact florescent light bulbs! The energy saving light bulbs that will be made compulsory in homes in a few years can trigger migraine headaches!

The Migraine Action Association (MAA) said some of its members alleged the fluorescent bulbs had led to attacks of the powerful headaches.

The MAA is calling on the Government to avoid a complete ban on old style bulbs, by providing an opt out for people with health problems. 

Last year it was claimed that the "green" bulbs can cause people with epilepsy to experience symptoms similar to the early stages of a fit. The bulbs may also affect people with Lupus, an auto immune disease, making their symptoms worse.

People I can tell you from first hand experience that I am light sensitive and when I am around florescent light I get headaches.  I can't stand florescent light!


Keep your friggin' DANGEROUS silly little florescent light bulbs out of MY house you MORONS!

DEMAND THAT WE CONTINUE TO HAVE FREE CHOICE TO CHOOSE OUR OWN LIGHT BULBS!!!
Are we living in a COMMUNIST country already because of the Envirowackos?
The truth is we're getting really close to it!

 

California wants to control the
temperature in your home!


In California there is a bill where the state will be able to control the thermostat in your home!
No people, you can't make this stuff up.  From Joseph Somsel at the American Thinker:

Who Will Control Your Thermostat?

There is nothing wrong with your thermostat!
Do NOT attempt to adjust the temperature!

WE are controlling your power consumption. 
If WE wish to make it hotter, we will turn off your air conditioner.  If WE wish to make it cooler, we will turn off your heater.  For the next millennium, sit quietly and WE will control your home temperature. 
We repeat, there is nothing wrong with your (our) thermostat."

That's just an "Outer Limits" example of what it might be like under California's revisions to Title 24.
But here is the real story:

"What should be controversial in the proposed revisions to Title 24 is the requirement for what is called a "programmable communicating thermostat" or PCT. Every new home and every change to existing homes' central heating and air conditioning systems will required to be fitted with a PCT beginning next year following the issuance of the revision.  Each PCT will be fitted with a "non-removable " FM receiver that will allow the power authorities to increase your air conditioning temperature setpoint or decrease your heater temperature setpoint to any value they chose.  During "price events" those changes are limited to +/- four degrees F and you would be able to manually override the changes. 
During "emergency events" the new setpoints can be whatever the power authority desires and you would not be able to alter them!

In other words, the temperature of your home will no longer be yours to control.  Your desires and needs can and will be overridden by the state of California through its public and private utility organizations.  All this is for the common good, of course."

Can you imagine the state controlling the temperature in your home all for a unproven THEORY of Global Warming and for the Liberals unwillingness to allow us to use more energy in the United States.

In fairness to the above article the Liberals of California are backing down from this revision because of the public outcry.

But the important thing to note is this is what the LIBERALS clearly WANT to do.  They want CONTROL over YOUR life.  And believe me, they will attempt to do this in the future.

Big Brother steps back from the thermostat

Lets hope it's not warmer outside than inside!

The Carbon Offset Scam
Al Gore uses hundreds of times more fuel than the average American to heat his home and to fly private jets all over the world.  He uses private jets to get to speaking engagements where they pay him hundreds of thousands of dollars for his "knowledge".  He justifies this hypocrisy by by buying "Carbon Offsets" that "neutralize" his "Carbon Footprint".

That's like saying it's OK that I, Al Gore can pollute, but I can pay money and be forgiven for for my massive "Carbon Footprint".

Carbon Offsets are the biggest scam going.  People are paying companies to plant trees for them to neutralize whatever Co2 gasses they create that they claim is causing Global Warming.

There's two things wrong with this. First of all it has not been proven that Co2 causes Global Warming.  In fact the REAL evidence shows that it is the Earth's NATURAL warming that CAUSES a rise in Co2 That's completely opposite of what Al Gore says, and there is a lot of evidence to support this claim as explained in the video;

"Exposed: The Climate Of Fear"

Secondly,  scientists are exploring the use of tree planting as a carbon offsets strategy. 
What they have discovered is that The First Rule of Carbon Offsets = No Trees.

Does planting trees reduce global warming? NO!
The Carnegie Institution's Ken Caldeira summarized the result of a major 2005 study  this way: “To plant forests to mitigate climate change outside of the tropics is a waste of time.”

Why?  Because forest canopies are relatively dark, compared to what they replace outside the tropics — grass, croplands, or snow fields — and so they absorb more of the sun's heating rays that fall on them. That negates the “carbon sink” benefit trees have soaking up carbon dioxide. Worse, the study found that planting a large number of trees in high latitudes would “probably have a net warming effect on the Earth's climate.” Ouch!

CLICK HERE to read the actual study.

Trees May Be Bad for You

Trees Won't Fix Global Warming

How Trees Might Not Be Green in Carbon Offsetting Debate

Junk Science: Can’t See the Warming for the Trees

So Al Gore's theories are WRONG, and his solutions are WRONG!
But Gore has never been one to let FACTS get in the way of his beliefs.
He says the science is over, and that this is about morality.
Get a clue Al, real science is NEVER over!
Especially YOUR theories which have been proven to be 100% WRONG!




But here is the BEST part of the Carbon Offset scam: 
Al Gore's "Carbon Offsets" are paid to a firm that HE owns and chairs!!!
He's making money by having himself, and others, pollute MORE!
The more they pollute, the more money he makes!
Plus he also makes hundreds of thousands of dollars for giving speeches
lying to people about Global Warming!


Al Gore has described the lifestyle he and his wife Tipper Gore live as "carbon neutral," meaning he tries to offset any energy usage, including plane flights and car trips, by "purchasing verifiable reductions in CO2 elsewhere."

Here is a picture of the Gore's mansion that uses 20 times the energy than the average American house.

Don't be like me!

The TRUTH is that it turns out Gore pays for his extra large carbon footprint through Generation Investment Management, a London based company with offices in Washington, D.C., for which he serves as chairman and partially owns. The company was established to take financial advantage of new technologies and solutions related to combating "Global Warming."

So the moral of the story is that if you're rich you can simply buy these useless "Carbon Offsets" and be forgiven what you claim is environmental damage!
 
 

Here is Al Gore getting off a private luxury Gulfstream Jet off and getting into his gas guzzling limousine.

The" carbon footprint" of this jet is that in one ONE hour of flying time it creates more CO2 than an average SUV uses in a YEAR!

Al Gore just another Limousine Liberal!

Watch the video HERE.

Click Here to watch Al Gore getting off a private jet.

Peter Schweizer writes: Al Gore has held these apocalyptic views about the environment for some time. So why, then, didn't Gore dump his family's large stock holdings in Occidental (Oxy) Petroleum? As executor of his family's trust, over the years Al Gore has controlled hundreds of thousands of dollars in Oxy stock. Oxy has been mired in controversy over oil drilling in ecologically sensitive areas. 

Living carbon neutral apparently doesn't mean living oil stock free. Nor does it necessarily mean giving up a mining royalty either.

Humanity might be "sitting on a ticking time bomb," but Gore's home in Carthage is sitting on a zinc mine. Up until 2003 Gore received $20,000 a year in royalties from Pasminco Zinc, which operates a zinc concession on his property. Tennessee has cited the company for adding large quantities of barium, iron and zinc to the nearby Caney Fork River. 

The issue here is not simply Gore's hypocrisy; it's a question of credibility. If he genuinely believes the apocalyptic vision he has put forth and calls for radical changes in the way other people live, why hasn't he made any radical change in his life? Giving up the zinc mine or one of his homes is not asking much, given that he wants the rest of us to radically change our lives.


The TRUTH is inconvenient for Al Gore!


 

The Religion of Environmentalism
The reason Al Gore and his friends claim that "the debate is over" is NOT because they are basing their beliefs on science.

It is because Environmentalism is the new RELIGION!

Actually, it's just Paganism, or the worship of the Earth.


Paganism

The Envirowackos don't REALLY care about the environment, or poor people starving to death. 

All they care about is making a political statement about the imaginary effects of "Global Warming" to make themselves feel like they are doing something to help the Earth, when the TRUTH is that they are making problems worse.  It's all about soothing their own guilty egos, and controlling the way the rest of us live.

The most important element of Global Warming isthat it has is faith, because the people who believe in it can't prove it.  So, it is nothing more than a religion for people who have not a whole lot of foundation in their lives. They want their lives to have meaning, so they're running around and doing these inconsequential things. They're "mattering," which everybody wants to do. 

The whole global warming movement has been based on nothing more than a scare oriented political agenda that was hatched by a bunch of big government liberals. 

That's all it's ever been, and the evidence, if any of you doubted it, could be found in the Kyoto protocol which is designed to fleece the United States and other wealthy nations around the world to pay for all the damage that we've caused, and to enact policies that would weaken our economy because it's not right to them that we're a wealthy country.

In the seventies the same people were talking about global cooling, and eventually there will be be another ice age and the environmentalists will say, "Yeah, it was brought on by global warming." Whatever happens, they'll blame it on Global Warming!

If the world warms it's Global Warming, If it cools, it will be because of Global Warming.

These people have set us a system, that we cannot question, that no matter what happens, they will always be right.

Al Gore actually said that "the internal combustion engine poses the greatest threat to humanity today."

The sad fact is that in his mind he's not kidding. Who could argue with such a learned man, after all, according to him, he did invent the Internet
 

Environmentalism is the new religion of choice for urban atheists. 

Did I say it's a religion?  Well, just look at the beliefs. If you look carefully, you see that environmentalism is in fact a perfect 21st century remaking of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs.

Just like Christianity there's an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there's a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a Judgment Day coming for us all. 

We are all energy sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability, or "going green".

Sustainability is salvation in the church of the environment. Just as organic food is its communion, that pesticide free wafer that the right people with the right beliefs, imbibe. 

Eden, the fall of man, the loss of grace, the coming doomsday -- these are deeply held mythic structures. 

I certainly don't want to talk anybody out of them, just as I don't want to talk anybody out of a belief that Jesus Christ is the son of God who rose from the dead. 

But the reason I don't want to talk anybody out of these beliefs is that I know that I can't talk anybody out of them. That's because these are NOT facts that can be argued. 
These are issues of FAITH. And you can't argue faith, by definition. 

And so it is, sadly, with environmentalism. Increasingly it seems facts aren't necessary, because the tenets of environmentalism are all about BELIEF.
 

According to Environmentalists it's about whether you are going to be a sinner, or be saved.

Whether you are going to be one of the people on the side of salvation, or on the side of doom. 

Whether you are going to be one of the enlightened ones who care, or one of those who want to destroy the Earth out of selfishness. 

Am I exaggerating to make a point?  I'm afraid not.

We know a lot more about the world than we did forty or fifty years ago. And what we know now is not so supportive of certain core environmental myths, yet these myths do not die. 

Let's examine some of those beliefs. There is no Eden. There never was. When was that the Eden of the wonderful mythic past? 

Was it the time when infant mortality was 80%, when four children in five died of disease before the age of five? When one woman in six died in childbirth?
When the average life span was 40, as it was in America a century ago?
When plagues swept across the planet, killing millions at a time. Was it when millions starved to death?  Is that when it was Eden?  It is to the environmentalists because they say at least we didn't have the internal combustion engine, and incandescent light bulbs back then.

Environmentalism is a religion that says their God is a tree or their God is some element of nature, and they don't need facts. They certainly don't want us "non believers" to question their facts which are actually only beliefs and NOT facts.

Then they try to make everybody feel guilty and they try to convince everybody that we, by simply living our lives, are destroying this planet. 

And it all harbors on this belief that this used to be pristine on the earth. Those Redwood Forest or those jungles, the rain forests, all, used to be pristine. 

It was just fine and dandy until we got here, and then WE started ruining things, and it's all centered around global warming and how we, energy sinners, environmental sinners, are destroying the planet. 

Today's environmentalism is TOTALLY a religious belief, and many of the people who adopt all this in fact claim to be secularists, who claim to have nothing to do with religion because they think religion is for kooks, that they are "men and women of science," that they are men and women a cut above all of us.

We are mere plebes incapable of understanding the deep, dark secrets that their brilliance alone is able to discern, and as such, we are but mere foot soldiers. Our minds are porous, but they can be shaped, and they continue to try to shape us each and every day with greater and greater fear and scare tactics, all the while telling us it's our fault.

They tell us if we don't believe in Global Warming we are
STUPID AND EVIL!

They say "I'm not going to be a religious nut right winger!  I'm smarter than that!"

Yet they are not secularists at all. They in fact are DEEPLY religious. They just have a different religion.  In fact if anything they are simply Pagans worshiping Mother Earth.

It is crucial to understand that all of this is made easy for these environmental religionists because they know that everybody's historical perspective begins with the day they were born. 

People thought they were in the last days 80 years ago. "Oh, it's never been worse" they said!
Look at all these diseases and pestilence. "We can't stop it!"
We think we're in the worst times we've ever had.  We think we're in the last days. 
Every generation does. 

So you've got people who have come along and tried to capitalize on this. They can't offer you facts. They don't have any REAL facts. All they can offer is EMOTION

Environmentalists hector us about the impending end of the world. Perhaps it is not the end of the world that they fear, it's just the end of THEM

Analysis of global temperatures is a subtle issue about which reasonable men reach different conclusions. 

The truth is that there is NO 100% conclusive DEFINITIVE EVIDENCE of global warming, or of man's absolute responsibility of it. That is simply a theory these people want us to accept as fact, and they refuse to even debate it.  But the facts are NOT what is at issue here for these people.

The evangelical zealotry that motivates the greenie weenie global-warmers has a different source than the facts and that is that human beings cannot bear their own transient existence without some hope of immortality.

This is the key, because this is the point here.  Immortality. Everybody thinks about it. 
Everybody thinks about the afterlife.  Everybody thinks there's got to be more than this, and everybody tries to do whatever they think necessary to discover what it is, and how to get there.

And the religion of environmentalism is what people hold dear today and the practice of it is the tool for that. 

The environment has become a religion for people. To many people, a tree or a plant or an animal is their religion, and it is there that they find their immortality and it is there that they find destruction which could cause their own mortality.

With the decline of Christianity the get high culture of the West: sex, drugs, and violence predominate. These devices eventually leave the user all the more anxious. 

By living on the underside of popular culture, the young people of the West make themselves feel worthless and insignificant.

In the cartoon Antz, an insect (with Woody Allen's voice) complains to an ant psychiatrist: "I feel so insignificant", to which the ant psychiatrist replies: "That's a breakthrough. You ARE insignificant!" 

That's a creepy thought; if human beings truly felt themselves to be insignificant, the suicide rate would be much higher. In fact, cultures who truly come to feel insignificant, eg, Stone Age peoples who come into unwanted contact with the modern world, sometimes register suicide rates of 25 percent to 50 percent.  We do not typically observe very high rates of suicide because the human mind resists its own destruction by wishing away its sense of insignificance. Paranoia is one such device.

In the United States, many people believed that evil white doctors invented AIDS to wipe out the poor population. 

Adolph Hitler believed that syphilis was a Jewish plot to poison Aryan blood. 

Today's educated Westerners do not normally believe in such bizarre ideas, but they are susceptible to subtler forms of the same thing. The sense of the transcendent they derive from contemplating nature is of desperate importance. 'It is not that I will pass from the earth without leaving so much as a grease spot to mark my stay". 'It is the earth herself who is in danger. The rain forests will vanish! The whales will become extinct! The ice caps are melting!'

Anxiety about the irreversible disappearance of some feature of the natural world substitutes for the death anxiety of the individual. The environmentalist now becomes the enemy of industrial civilization in general. 

Of course I do not oppose SENSIBLE measures to protect clean air and water, to protect the rain forests, to prevent over fishing and so forth, but I am weary of the fanaticism that distinguishes the conservationist from the environmental fanatic who has turned against civilization.
 

Just look at the new scare tactic book, "The Earth Without Humans" where the author imagines a world without humans because "Global Warming" has destroyed  the Earth.

The most of the media won't print the TRUE facts that the temperature readings are wrong, or that the "hottest years on record" as reported by NASA have now been updated which makes all of their computer "models" that Al Gore uses useless.
NASA Corrects 120 Years Worth of Bad Data.

They won't print that the glaciers are actually growing larger in Antarctica, or that the Sun is actually getting hotter.
Guess what? Antarctica's getting colder, not warmer!

Seasons of the Sun

No, they want to use fear tactics and blame man because it makes a better story line, a better "template" that's more dramatic.  It's much better to report "THE SKY IS FALLING!"

Fear sells, normal weather patterns do not.

It doesn't matter if New York City is scorching hot or freezing cold.  Man did it because he is an environmental sinner.

Some even suggest that the planet would be better if we were gone.  Women are now aborting babies to "save the planet"!

Click Here to see the video for 
"The Earth Without Humans"

Here's another: Your House Without You




It is worth observing that the U.S. returns more farmland to the wilderness every year, because rising agricultural productivity concentrates more output on a smaller number of square miles.
But Al Gore, the media, or the environmentalists won't tell you that.

Environmentalism has become the new religion. Everybody needs to believe in their own immortality. 

These are people that are just afraid of death.
Is that because they are in fact Godless?

This is why recycling has become so prevalent. It's costs far more in money, and yes, it costs the environment MORE in overall pollution to recycle, but we do it because we are told it will "save the Earth".  It's simply not true, and it's doing EXACTLY the opposite of what they claim it is.

The same holds true with Global Warming. There is just as much evidence against global warming as there is for it.  But the liberal media generally doesn't print that because it does not fit into their template of blaming man, especially the "evil rich white man" living in the United States who is to be blamed for destroying the earth for his own greed.

The Weather Channel reporter Dr. Heidi Cullen recently said "the Earth has not been this hot in the last million years." 

Really?!!!

How does that jive with the newly discovered evidence that the Greenland ice core samples PROVE that Greenland was MUCH warmer just 450,000 years ago?!!!

I had no idea Dr. Cullen was THAT old, she only looks to be in her early thirties to me!

We KNOW what she says is not true because of the mini ice ages and mini heat waves that have been documented over the years.

In the 1600's they made wine in Britain, now it's too cold to do so.

But once again I say it's NOT about the facts, it's about a belief. A belief that man is evil and is destroying the earth.

It's interesting that the same secularists who claim right wing Christians are out of their minds because they believe in Jesus Christ are the same ones who now believe in the Religion of Environmentalism because that's where their beliefs lie.

Dr. Cullen has also said that other meteorologists who disagree with Global Warming should be FIRED!

That's the way we should act, let's just close down the debate since she and the Reverend Gore have given us the final word.

Grist Magazine's staff writer David Roberts called for the Nuremberg style trials for the “bastards” who were members of what he termed the global warming “denial industry.”

Robert's wrote in the online publication on September 19, 2006, "When we've finally gotten serious about global warming, when the impacts are really hitting us and we're in a full worldwide scramble to minimize the damage, we should have war crimes trials for these bastards -- some sort of climate Nuremberg."

So now if we don't believe in Global Warming we should be considered on the par of the Nazis?!!!

He should keep in mind that it was actually it was the Nazi's who shut down open debate, JUST like Al Gore and his buddies want to do about this issue.


What about all the environmentalists who forced us to stop using CFC's to help restore the hole in the Ozone Layer.  CFC's were removed from EVERY spray can by governmental laws, and the freon had to be reformulated in EVERY vehicle, EVERY refrigerator, and EVERY air conditioning unit at great expense to EVERYONE who lives in modern society.

But now the entire science behind ozone depletion is being questioned after 20 years of this environmental scare.  Markus Rex, an atmospheric scientist at the Alfred Wegener Institute of Polar and Marine Research in Potsdam, Germany, says "If the measurements are correct we can basically no longer say we understand how ozone holes come into being. What effect the results have on projections of the speed or extent of ozone depletion remains unclear."

So we made all these drastic changes and the "science" behind this scare was unfounded.
It's just more envirowackism gone amuck.

Ozone Hole Science Revisited

Take a look at the book "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism)", by Christopher C. Horner.

For decades, environmentalism has been the Left's best excuse for increasing government control over our actions in ways both large and small. "It's for Mother Earth!" "It's for the CHILDREN!"
It's for the whales, and the polar bears, and the cute little penguins! 

But until now, the doomsday scenario environmental scares they've trumped up haven't been large enough to justify the lifestyle restrictions they want to impose. 

Click Here to see the book.

But under the moniker of "Global Warming" or now the new buzz word, "Climate Change" greenhouse gasbags can now argue that auto emissions in Ohio threaten people in Paris, and that only "global governance" (Jacques Chirac's words) can tackle such problems. 

Now, in The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism, Christopher C. Horner tears the cover off the Left's manipulation of environmental issues for political purposes and lays out incontrovertible evidence for the fact that catastrophic man-made global warming is just
Chicken-Little hysteria, NOT actual science.

He explains why Al Gore and his cronies among the media elite's and the United Nations globalists endlessly claim that "Global Warming" is an unprecedented global crisis, they really think of it as a dream come true. It's the ideal scare campaign for those who hate capitalism and love big government. 

For, as Horner explains, if global warming really were as bad as the Leftist doomsayers insist that it is, then NO policy imaginable could "solve" it. 

According to the logic of the greens' own numbers,
no matter how much we sacrifice there would still be more to do. 

That makes Global Warming the bottomless well of excuses for the relentless growth of big government . . . just perfect for High Taxing Liberals!

Click Here to see the book
"The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism)"
by Christopher C. Horner.

Al Gore's Earth Pledge

Al Gore wants us all to sign a pledge to help "save" the Earth.  I'm NEVER going to sign it, and I am going to oppose it as much as possible. Al Gore's idiotic pledge is in the green text and my SANE and responsible answers are in the yellow text.

I PLEDGE:

1. To demand that my country join an international treaty within the next 2 years that cuts global warming pollution by 90% in developed countries and by more than half worldwide in time for the next generation to inherit a healthy earth.

Bullshit! 

You STILL haven't proven that CO2 causes global warming, and you won't even listen to the other side of the story that is supported by thousands of scientists. Enter into a SENSIBLE and FAIR debate and stop using your scare propaganda to warp peoples minds, especially our children.

I'm not going to destroy the Unites States economy, or the worlds economy, and hurt the poorest people of the world, just for your unproven theory and the fact that you have not thought about ALL the consequences your "solutions" have created.  There is NO POSSIBLE WAY to reduce Co2 production by 90% no matter what we do. 

FACT: Al Gore says that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day. What he doesn't tell you is that mother nature puts 24,000 TIMES that amount of our main greenhouse gas -- water vapor -- into the atmosphere every day. 
Source: Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville, former NASA scientist,

2. To take personal action to help solve the climate crisis by reducing my own CO2 pollution as much as I can and offsetting the rest to become "carbon neutral;"

There is no such thing as "Carbon Neutral" so please stop bullshitting us.  It's just a money making scheme and a way for those using more energy than others to make themselves feel like they are doing something to help the environment when in truth they are doing NOTHING that will make ANY difference whatsoever. 

You're not "Carbon Neutral" Mr. Gore, you're "Carbon Retarded"!  Actually you're a pretty smart man. You're making MILLIONS by peddling your BULLSHIT to the world by giving paid speeches and selling people useless "Carbon Credits"!

3. To fight for a moratorium on the construction of any new generating facility that burns coal without the capacity to safely trap and store the CO2;

Then let us drill for oil in the United States, let us build NON POLLUTING nuclear power plants that will not damage the environment.

4. To work for a dramatic increase in the energy efficiency of my home, workplace, school, place of worship, and means of transportation;

I don't purposely waste energy, and I'm not going to dramatically alter my lifestyle just because you tell me to.  I'm going to drive the type of car that I want to, and I'm not going to ferry others around in it to carpool. YOU can do that in your private jet!!! 

Hey, Reverend Gore, why don't you practice what you preach and stop taking privates jets and wasting all that fuel and creating more pollution and fly commercial like I do!

5. To fight for laws and policies that expand the use of renewable energy sources and reduce dependence on oil and coal.

That's ALWAYS the Liberal solution, MORE laws!  Trees are renewable but you won't even let us cut down the dead ones to prevent forest fires where we loose ALL the trees!

Let us build nuclear power plants. Then we can run powerful electric cars on them and not these stupid little hybrids, and those tiny unsafe tin cans of death that only have a 50 horsepower engine in them.  Tesla Motors ( http://www.teslamotors.com ) is offering a REAL electric car that doesn't pollute at all, except for the electricity that must be made to power them.

Let us build more Nuclear power plants and these cars will be TOTALLY non polluting.

Why can't you people figure this out on your own?

Nuclear power is the safest, most non polluting form of energy we have.  Stop opposing it.

6. To plant new trees and to join with others in preserving and protecting forests.

I have enough trees on my property thank you very much.  By the way, stay off MY property with your Liberal bullshit laws. The logging companies already plant MORE trees every year than they harvest.  They know they have to do this to continue to use trees for lumber.

YOU'RE the ones telling us to use Ethanol which is destroying forests!

YOU people need us let us cut down overgrown trees, a natural renewable resource, and thin forests so that we don't loose ENTIRE forests as in what happened in the California and Lake Tahoe wildfires. 

Environmentalists sued and protested that trees should not be cut down in California. 
That's a nice Earth saving thought. But what happened? 

The forests got overgrown, dried out and caught fire. Thousands of people lost their homes because of these fires and thousands and thousands of acres of land ended up TREELESS because they ALL burned down!  YOUR solution left us with NO TREES instead of a sensibly managed forest.

In New Orleans the envirowackos sued the Army Corps of Engineers and successfully prevented them from making the levee's stronger before Hurricane Katrina. They wanted to help save the wetlands.  Well, they did that, the levee's broke and now ALL of New Orleans is wetlands!

Instead of letting us cut down even dead trees to save the forests, we lose entire forests and people's homes and even lives because of the increased fire hazard that YOU PEOPLE created by your nonsensical, idiotic, SELFISH rules. 

YOU'RE making environmental problems WORSE because of your Envirowacko, extremist stupidity.

7. To buy from businesses and support leaders who share my commitment to solving the climate crisis and building a sustainable, just, and prosperous world for the 21st century.

I'll buy what I want, when I want it, from where I want.  If I want a Hummer I'll buy one.
If fact I will NOT buy anything from any corporation that panders to your false religion of Global Warming.
I will NOT support politicians who buy into this global warming nonsense and the inane solutions you propose.

STOP TELLING ME WHAT TO DO!!!
YOU can do all these energy saving thing in YOUR home!
Stop trying to FORCE us all to follow your Religion of Environmentalism!
I don't need a new religion, thank you very much, I already have one.

MY Pledge is to OBSTRUCT Al Gore's insane mandates in every way I can!
I advise all of you to do the same also.

Spread the word:
Global Warming is a HOAX!!!

One other thing, stop telling me I need to ride a frigging bicycle to work!!!
YOU can ride YOUR bike, I'll be buzzing by you in my NON-hybrid 300 HP sports car!!!

(While Al Gore flies above us in his gas guzzling private jet!)


Al Gore and Global Warming - Is He a Hypocrite?


By the way Al, could your head get ANY fatter?
Al Gore's head just might blow!

Hey Al, my friend Penn has a little message
from all of us here in Sanity land.

Click Here to hear Penn tell Al Gore to . . .
Click Here to hear Penn tell Al Gore to . . .

Someone HAD to say it!


 
Rockstar / Philanthropist Bono of U2
goofs on "Father" Al Gore!

I love the fact that U2 frontman and singer Bono pokes fun at Al Gore's religion of Global Warming.
At a January 2008 conference in Davos, Switzerland, where Bono was making a case for the starving, aids infected children of Africa, Al Gore was wasting everybody's time by peddling his meaningless religion.

Bono said:  It's not even a professorial thing, as has been cited.  He's more as a rabbinical. Or like an Irish priest, you confess your sins. 

"Father Al, I am not just a noise polluter, I am a noise-polluting, diesel-sucking, methane-emitting, gulfstream-flying rock star." 

"And what are you going to do about it son? Are you going to kick the habit?" 

"I'm trying Father Al, but to be honest with you, oil has been very good for me. It's been very good for me. It's been very good to me.  Those convoys of articulated lorries, petrochemical products, hair gel!"

Click Here to hear Bono poke fun at "Father" Al Gore!

Click Here to hear Bono make fun of father Al Gore!

Bono actually does things to affect real world change, such as raising money for Africa's poor, and making the world more aware that the developing world needs not only money and food, but for employment and trade, (Capitalism & Freedom) to help bring them out of poverty, starvation, and slavery.  He also attacks religious extremism and supports the war against terror.

Click Here to see Bono bring real change to Africa through Capitalism.

Click Here to see Bono bring real change to Africa through Capitalism.
But what Al Gore is proposing is that Third World countries NOT use their natural resources such as oil, coal, and natural gas because he BELIEVES their use will destroy the planet. 

He also supports the use of Ethanol which has already caused world food prices to rise, therefore spreading world starvation more.

Al Gore's phony religion makes the world a worse place, and makes everyday life WORSE for millions of starving, dying, poor people.

In sub-Saharan Africa, some 95% of the people don't have electricity. 
In one week, Al Gore uses MORE electricity than 25 millionUgandans use in a year. And yet the radical greens battle every mode of electricity generation, except the most nominal, irrelevant generators. 

The Rainforest Action Network and other activists are constantly pressuring banks and construction companies NOT to build coal- or gas-fired power plants in Africa or other developing countries.

Shhh, I know best!
Shhhh!
No oil for you!


But Reverend Al,
I'm HUNGRY!!!

Gore says about Africa and other developing nations: 
"As poor countries develop, it is essential that they do not follow the same failed patterns of energy use that has been the model for the Western World."  So it's cow dung, not diesel for Africa!

The second leading cause of childhood deaths is not malaria or Aids, it is diarrhea, caused by drinking dirty water.  Why is the African water dirty?  Mainly because they lack cheap, efficient means of pumping and cleaning it. That requires fossil fuels--either directly or to produce electricity.

Yes, Reverend Al, the same "failed" Western policies that have given us clean water, plentiful food, jobs, and warm homes could prevent millions of starving African children from dying. 
Africa will be "green", but everybody will be dead!   Nice Guy!

Gore's Policies Keep Africa in the Dark

Africa: Live Earth Vs. Africa

Global Warming Causes 
EVERYTHING!!!

To show how  ridiculous the Global Warming crowd is, and how it is simply environmental hysteria driving this movement, here are the links of all the things that the environmentalists are blaming on potential Global Warming.  Some of these claims are very funny.  Let's not forget that Al Gore says we should not debate Global Warming and that should just accept it because the science is OVER!

If that is true then why do so many of
these claimed dangers contradict each other?!

The most telling part of of this list and it's bogus alarmist claims is to see
how many of these claims actually contradict each other.

The entire list with links is posted by on this page.

Global Warming Causes EVERYTHING!!!

I had to put the links on another page because there are over 600 of them!
You won't believe the haw many links there are!!!

 Al Gore accepts the Nobel Peace Prize 
Saying it's "time to make peace with the planet," Al Gore accepted the Nobel Peace Prize today with a call for humanity to rise up against a looming climate crisis and stop waging war on the environment.

While accepting his Nobel Peace Prize for Global Warming, Al Gore actually compared "Global Warming Deniers" to those who appeased the Nazis!

"Too many of the world's leaders are still best described in the words Winston Churchill applied to those who ignored Adolph Hitler's threat: 'They go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all powerful to be impotent," Gore drew a parallel between leaders who ignore the climate crisis and those who didn't act as Nazi Germany rearmed before World War II.

He likened the current "planetary emergency" to WARTIME. "We must quickly mobilize our civilization with the urgency and resolve that has previously been seen only when nations mobilized for war," he said.  He wants to declare war on Global Warming!!!

In a speech that quoted Churchill, Gandhi and THE BIBLE(!), Gore said the world's biggest producers of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases -- the United States and China -- must stop blaming each other for the stalemate over warming.

There's no stalemate Al, we just know YOU'RE just full of methane!

Didn't I tell you this was their religion?  Now Al's quoting the BIBLE!  Hey Al, what would Jesus do?  Maybe he'd stop flying around in privates jets don't you think?!

Al Gore won't debate Global Warming and say that those who even suggest debate are like Nazi appeasers

Un Frickin' Believable!


Al Gore accepts the Nobel Peace Prize
Remember people, if you want to debate 
Global Warming YOU'RE a NAZI appeaser!

I've had it with this ASSHOLE, let's tell the TRUTH about Al Gore right here and now. 
He lost the 2000 Presidential election, and knew he would never be able to run for president again. 
So he found a cause to make him famous and seem like a great guy.  It's all about his EGO because it CERTAINLY isn't about science.

He's found this cause that's made him a great celebrity, and if Jesus himself came down from Heaven and told him his whole Global Warming deal was a hoax, he'd still keep telling us these lies.

Hey, don't blame me for the Jesus analogy, I told you this was a religion!

The TRUTH is that people are falling for this Global Warming nonsense, because the media and and everyone is telling them about Global Warming.  It's a self fulfilling prophecy!

The Science of Gore's Nobel
What if everyone believes in global warmism
only because everyone believes in global warmism?

One of my Envirowacko friends (Yes, I reluctantly let them into my home) says that she can't wait until President Bush is out of office because his administration is "silencing the media and covering up Global Warming which is why you never really hear about it"

SILENCING THE MEDIA?!!!! 

Yes folks, she's THAT insane. Just go to Yahoo news and type in Global Warming and you'll find HUNDREDS of stories on it EVERY day.  I'm searching there right now and the stories are MINUTES apart!  Thousands of them. 

The point is that people are believing in Global Warming
because the media keeps telling them that it exists.

It's propaganda, just like they used in . . .
NAZI GERMANY!

 WE'RE DOOMED!!!
(Crap, I almost had my house paid off!!!)


OK people, we blew it. We didn't listen to the warning, 
WE'RE DOOMED! That's right, a new report now says that ALL of the Arctic ice will be GONE by 2012!  That's just a few years away!

They say that the Arctic is SCREAMING!!!  Funny, I didn't hear anything, did you?

But then they said "We have not passed a point of no return"

The Arctic is SCREAMING!!!

Melting Arctic may be ice free by 2012

So they are concluding that ALL the summer Arctic ice will be gone in about 4 years but if we all do the "right thing" now we can save the planet in that time?!!! 

Al Gore, please jump on your private jet and help us, tell us what the "right thing" to do is?!!!  PLEASE SAVE US REVEREND AL!!!

I REPENT!  I don't want to be an environmental sinner anymore!!!

I'm not sure if these people are idiots, or they think we are for believing in this bull.  But I suspect is a bit of both.  Gee, maybe what they meant to say is that if we all stop believing in this nonsense their JOBS could be gone by 2012 because the funding would stop!

So now they have a new term for Global Warming,
it's now going to be called GLOBAL SCREAMING!!!



 
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention, the penguins will be gone too!
Such cute little guys!   Just look at their sad little faces!

We HAVE to save them!

Antarctica's penguins threatened by global warming

I'm going to sell my sports car today and and walk to work so I don't pollute anymore!  That will fix EVERYTHING!


But wait!  I just found out that walking causes more pollution than driving!

Walking does more than driving to cause global warming!

I have to stop exercising because it causes Global Warming too!

"Food production is now so energy intensive that more carbon is emitted providing a person with enough calories to walk to the shops than a car would emit over the same distance. The climate could benefit if people avoided exercise, ate less and became couch potatoes." 

Exercise Causes Global Warming


 Let me think, I'm going to have to give up my job, give up my car, and sit in a mud hole, and starve to death so I don't hurt the planet!

Then that vulture can eat me.  But wait, he'll poop and create more methane and greenhouse gasses!  But that's OK because he's a NATURAL creature of the Earth, I'm simply a man, an INTRUDER on the planet!  That's the way the Envirowackos really feel about man.

Listen folks, I'm not making fun of this starving child.  I actually donate a good deal of money to African and American poverty relief.

I support causes that actually do something real, like putting food into children's bellies.  I'm not going to support a stupid cause like Global Warming which does nothing but create MORE poverty.

And besides, the more we use food and water to make stupid things like Ethanol, the more we actually SPREAD starvation around the world.

You get the point I'm making.  These radical environmental alarmists will say ANYTHING to get you to believe in Global Warming, ANYTHING! And we ain't gonna buy this nonsense anymore, are we?

EVERYTHING CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING!!!

Stop INFECTING the minds of our children with this nonsense!!!

The sea ice ISN'T melting!
OK people, back to the REAL science that Al Gore REFUSES to debate! 

I've got bad news for him: the sea ice isn't really melting even though we just had ten more news stories telling us it is in the last hour!

Al gets really upset when I start using that EVIL real science again!

The chart below, submitted by Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville, former NASA scientist, shows that the sea ice has been extremely steady for the last 20 years.



While sunlight is the source of energy for the Earth's weather and climate system, it is rain and snow systems that control how warm or how cold temperatures get on Earth. They do this in two ways: 

1) they directly limit how much of our main greenhouse gas, water vapor, is allowed to accumulate in the Earth's atmosphere; and 
2) they directly or indirectly control global cloudiness. 

FACT: Al Gore likes to say that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day. What he doesn't tell you is that mother nature puts 24,000 times that amount of our main greenhouse gas -- water vapor -- into the atmosphere every day. 


 
Dr. Roy Spencer

Dr. Roy Spencer says  "I'm sure you've seen the WWF report about penguins on the Antarctic Peninsula in decline based on the fact that the sea ice is melting. 
Yet sea ice around Antarctic has been running one million square kilometers above normal for the past couple of months."
Sea ice is expanding in the Antarctic.  Greenland is not melting. 
None of the things that they say are actually happening. 
I don't even believe that the penguins are threatened. 

They make all this other stuff up, too, and the reason they do is to get to the hearts and minds of little kids.  "Mommy, mommy, the penguins are going extinct, and the polar bears.  Why are you and daddy doing to save them?"

That's how this stuff works.  You have the Al Gore mockumentary in schools that shows these polar bears running around, supposedly deserted and stranded on ice that is melting all around them and it's simply not true.

It's OBSCENE!  And, again, what allows it to succeed?  Ignorance.  Ignorance of the people is the most expensive thing we pay for in this country."

Dr. Spencer is a great and wise man with an extensive climatological background.  I'll be posting much more about him on this site soon.  I know he's only a well respected climate scientist, and not a Nobel Peace Prize winner like Al Gore, but just maybe we should listen to him even though he is an
"EVIL GLOBAL WARMING NAZI DENIER"!!!

Global Warming and Nature's Thermostat:
Precipitation Systems 
by Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D


Arctic Sea Ice Re-Freezing at Record Pace!

OH NO! This is TERRIBLE news for the Global Warming crowd!!! 
Time for more GLOBAL SCREAMING!!!


New data just in, December 2007:  A record setting pace of re-freezing of sea ice in November 2007, has been reported by the the NASA Earth Observatory. Some 58,000 square miles of ice formed per day for 10 days in late October and early November, a new world record.

Earlier this year the Global Warming crowd said that the Northwest Passage was opening and that this was a sure sign of global warming.

What they failed to tell you is that the passage open twice in the 20th century. Once when Roald Amundsen sailed it in 1906, and it opened again in 1944.
Then the ice froze over passage the following years.

The thawing and the re freezing of the ice is NORMAL.  I find the most silly thing about this whole Global Warming hoax is that they are comparing this year to year data.  These envirowackos claim the Earth can tell us in ONE YEAR that it is in crisis. Then they dig out the last 100 year temperature records and say we are in the warmest period ever. Even 100 years is a minuscule slice of time in the history of the Earth.

But then it's discovered that the records were wrong, which they fail to publicize in the media.
Al Gore, the non scientist, acts like THEY KNOW FOR SURE, when the truth is they haven't a clue.

One of the funniest stories I saw recently, to which I lost the link to, was when a bunch of "scientists" went to the Arctic this year to study the "recent loss of sea ice".  Apparently the weather was so cold the scientists had to be rescued by airplane because their ship got caught in the frozen ice:)


Global warming melting Arctic Ice
Manipulation of public perceptions


"While the media raised alarms over Arctic ice  melt, they did not report that Antarctic winter sea ice extent was the greatest on record. A similar pattern of annual freeze and melt occurs in the ocean around the continent but it changes from a summer minimum of about 2 million square kilometers to a winter maximum of about 15 million square kilometers for a an annual change of some 13 million square kilometers." 

Of course, all this ice is in the water, so when it melts sea level doesn't change. So the ice is not disappearing. Annual melt and refreeze is large, and current situations are well within normal numbers. The fuss over the ice works because people don't know. But in case lack of knowledge doesn't work an emotional and guilt trip will persuade the rest, or at least isolate them as uncaring.

As Derek Bok said, “If you think education is expensive - try ignorance.” Ignorance allows presentation of natural events as unnatural or normal events as abnormal.

Click Here to read the article.


Dr. Roy Spencer, the former NASA scientist, is displaying the latest globally averaged satellite temperatures, and it shows that the globally average temperature of the planet has NOT warmed in the last six years, and it is still well below 1998, which was the most recent hottest year, and that was an El Niño year.  Right now, we are below even the temperatures of 2002, and the levels of warming are actually decreasing at this point on this graph.

The graph also contains a little red shaded arrow with an arrow pointing left to right showing 
Al Gore's Armageddon, acorrding to him, that if global temperatures reach this red shaded area, then we're cooked, we're doomed, we're done. and you can see how far beneath it that we are; and you can see how, since 1998, six years ago, that the global temperatures have NOTwarmed. 

So should we believe the noted climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer or the FAILED POLITICIAN Al Gore who's "science" is based on faulty data?

What's happening here is simply an affront to our intelligence.


 
CBS's 60 Minutes runs the same inaccurate
"Age of Warming" story over and over again!
The TV "news" show on CBS, 60 Minutes keeps running thier "Age of Warming" story over, and over, and over again.  They claim they have updated it to include more of the actual facts (truth).

But if you saw it you know that once again they simply keep repeating the same old inaccuracies, and leaving out the real truth once again.

Click Here to see the truth about this story.

Click Here to see the video.

Here is a report that shows how last year, 2007, 60 Minutes re-ran the story supposedly with the new facts, and how that was just another CBS lie.  The have just run the report AGAIN in Jan of 2008, right after a big NFL football championship game so that they could try and gain another huge audience for this "news" show.

The anchor for this show was Scott Pelley. Pelley, an Anti Bush, Pro Climate Change advocate has gone far beyond that of being a newsman. It is so painfully obvious that he is biased that it's not funny.  Just like Dan Rather before him, fired for attempting to use forged documents to prevent President Bush from gaining a second term in office, Pelley repeatedly leaves out the real facts.

He leaves out the new information of the story and keeps slipping in the words "Bush Administration" and "Exxon-Mobil" to tries and demonize President Bush for Global Warming.

But if you listen very closely to the "story" (propaganda) that they run, you can actually hear how he's twisting words around to fit the "Climate Change" agenda.

Yes folks, now it's "Climate Change" that is the new buzz word for Global Warming
They are now saying "Climate Change" in case the earth actually proves to be cooling in the next few years so that they can still blame man for it.

Even some of the "scientists" presented on the program say that the sea ice will melt within 10 years, and it's now inevitable, they admit "there's nothing we can do".

In the report Pelley presents one scientist who works for the Bush Administration who claims that the administration tries to silence everything he says.  He accuses them of trying to keep him quiet. 

The funny part is that here he is on 60 Minutes, probably the most popular "news" program in the entire world, saying EXACTLY what he is accusing the administration of trying to prevent him from stating!  Yet even after this 3rd airing of this special "news" report, this man is STILL on President Bush's payroll.

This scientist is on the government payroll, part of the $5 billion dollars that President Bush gave them to study Global Warming.

That's $5 billion more than Bill Clinton and Al Gore ever spent on the subject.

Bill Clinton signed the Kyoto Treaty but never even sent it to the U.S. Senate for ratification!
Al Gore was the man, when in office, advised AGAINST ratifying the treaty.

Click Here to watch Al Gore advise AGAINST
ratifying Kyoto when HE was in office.
Click Here to watch Al Gore advise AGAINST ratifying Kyoto when HE was in office.
 

But now that George Bush is in office Al Gore blames America
for blocking Kyoto.  Now isn't that CONVENIENT for him!
Click Here to see the clip.
Click Here to see Al Gore blame America.

 Red men speak with forked tounge!

Is that Global Warming that has Bill's face so red?!!!
Red men speak with forked tounge!
Calm down dude before you burst a blood vessel!

Click Here to see the truth about the 60 Minutes story.

The Great 2007 Energy Bill!
In December of 2007 the Democratic Congress led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid finally passed a comprehensive energy bill that will solve ALL of our energy needs!

Yes folks, this Congress with approval rating of 16%, the lowest EVER measured by a poll in U.S. history, FINALLY got us all a sensible energy policy.

Harry Reid & Nancy Pelosi - MORONS of the Left!

They sent the bill for President Bush to sign in a hybrid Toyota Prius, how environmentally correct!

Here are the fantastic details of this "ENERGY" policy: 

100 watt incandescent light bulbs will be BANNED by 2012.  Light bulbs will be mandated to be three times more efficient than they are today. It's amazing how these politicians can control science! Thanks for not controlling our FREEDOM guys!

TV's and Computers will have labels on them telling the customer how much energy they use. 
By the way guys, we ALREADY have those labels on all electrical appliances in case you haven't looked!

New stickers on cars will tell customers how many miles per gallon the car gets AND they will also display the amount of greenhouse gasses the car will emit.  Fuel standards will be forced to be raised to 35 miles per gallon on ALL vehicles, and all gas will be mandated to have a certain percentage of biofuel like Ethanol in it.

Great, now we can cause food prices to rise, more droughts, and more starvation in the world without ONE BIT of difference to our environment!  Didn't you guys read about the INCREASED pollution Ethanol creates?  They even admit these vehicles will cost and additional $10,000 to $15,000 than they do today!  Thanks for helping out the little guy!  Banning the car you own now won't be far behind.

The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy has projected that the bill will reduce energy use by 7% and carbon dioxide emissions by 9% in 2030. 
WOW!  That's REALLY significant!  Aren't they aware that Al Gore says the planet will be dead in 10 years, and that all the sea ice will be gone by 2012?


In case you haven't noticed one small issue . . .

THERE ISN'T ANY ENERGY IN
THE ENERGY BILL!!!

The entire bill is ALL about conservation and has virtually NOTHING in it about the creation of any new energy.  No nuclear power plants, no drilling our own abundant supplies of oil in the United States, no drilling of any more natural gas, no increased clean coal production, not even any wind or solar power!

This has to be the first time in history that there is NO new energy in an ENERGY BILL!

The population of the United States WILL increase in future years, that's a given.  It's also a given that no matter how much we conserve we will STILL need MORE ENERGY!  An economy CANNOT grow by the means of conservation!  We need MORE energy, We MUST have more energy!

But this Congress with it's 16% approval rating ONLY wants to LIMIT our energy use (FREEDOM), and is doing NOTHING about creating more energy here. 

The facts are that 80% of the American people want us to drill our OWN oil here in the USA
We also want increased natural gas production, clean coal, AND clean, efficient NON POLLUTING nuclear power plants.  My goodness, even the French can figure that out!

But screw what we the American People want. Congress knows what's best.  They have determined that we are greedy, planet destroying fools and that THEY are going to save us all.

Sheer Insanity!

Hey Washington!  We need MORE energy!
ARE YOU LISTENING TO US?


The Great 2007 Energy Bill of 2007 passed by the Democrats is already having a major ripple effect in our economy.  Their plan of energy conservation is a DISASTER

In California there has been a drop off in gasoline sales.  But since the state depends upon the gasoline taxes for revenue they are also noticing that that state revenue is dropping also. 

Meanwhile, since there is no REAL Energy plan gas prices are continuing to rise.  So because Californians are using less oil, and therefore leaving the state with less tax revenue, Democratic State Senators are proposing RAISING the gasoline taxes in California! 
Along with the rising fuel prices, this will hit YOU the consumer with the double whammy of price increases.

We might also consider how much food is grown in California. If it takes diesel fuel to move that food, and diesel prices are higher than ever before, who do you think is going to pay? 
That's right it's YOU the evil consumer who wants to feed your family.

So the Democrats solution which allows for NO new oil refineries and NO addtional oil drilling is actually threatening to crush our economy in the very near future.
While they want us to conserve, and no matter how much we do so, there will always been an increased need for energy in the United States.  And when we do conserve they want to raise our taxes because they are making less revenue from less fuel use. We can't win with these people!

Here are two news reports that show how the cost of diesel fuel is close to shutting down our entire economy. 

Cost Of Diesel Has Truck Drivers Issuing Warning

High Diesel Gas Prices Trickle Down to Consumers

Soaring diesel fuel prices slowing truckers

Rising diesel costs have some schools struggling to keep bus fleets running

Click Here to see how high diesel prices are rising.
Click Here for news report 1
Click Here to see how high diesel prices are rising.
Click Here for news report 2

 
Click Here for news report 3
Click Here to see how high diesel prices are rising.

Woo Hoo! No new drilling!
Good job guys!!! MORONS!!!
Harry Reid & Nancy Pelosi - MORONS of the Left!

What Form Of Energy Do
Environmentalists Actually Support?

Environmentalists have sued to prevent nuclear power plants, and hydroelectric plants from being
built.

They have opposed grain alcohol, biodiesal, methanol, natural gas, and propane. 

They even oppose windmills outlawing them in certain parts of the country because they can
be dangerous to birds and they "disturb the natural beauty of the landscape."

Now they are coming out against solar electric panels because they are highly reflective and can temporarily blind birds even there is NO credible evidence of this!

There is NO form of energy I can see that they actually support. NONE!!!

What's left?!!!

They simply want us to "use less."  Get a clue people, energy is the fuel of the worlds economy.
It makes EVERYONE have a better life and pulls people out of poverty.

The Envirowackos now have the nerve to tell poor developing nations that they better not pump oil 
 and that they need to "go green" as for their energy needs.

HOW DARE YOU IDIOTS tell these poor starving countries NOT
to use their own natural resources.
HOW DARE you keep them in poverty and starvation
to soothe your own guilty egos!

What do the ENVIROWACKOS want us to do?  Not to use trees to build houses, not to drive cars, not have trucks ship us food?  Do they simply want us to go back to the days of tilling the Earth with oxen and horses?  They better not do that or PETA will protest that we would be abusing the animals!

They want us just to sit in the dirt like the poor Africans who are starving to death in spite of the TRILLIONS of dollars we have sent them in the last 40 years to feed them.

The TRUTH is that these Envirowackos are extreme left wing liberals who are SOCIALISTS who despise Capitalism.  Yet they all seem to have cell phones and blogs.

Speaking of the terrorist organization PETA - (yes, they have funded terrorists who have firebombed legitimate businesses) , they have now proclaimed that no one can claim to be an environmentalist if they eat meat of any kind!

PETA to Al Gore: 
You can't be a meat eating environmentalist.
CLICK HERE to read the story.

Talk about an EXTREME position!


 
Abort your baby to Save The Planet!
Meet the planet saving Toni VernelliMs. Vernelli is “Eco-Friendly” believing pregnancy and giving birth hurts the planet earth.

Having an ABORTION to help save the planet was not enough for Ms. Vernelli, she wanted to be "fixed" so she could never get pregnant again.

Finally, eight years ago, Toni got her life's greatest wish.

At the age of 27 this young woman at the height of her reproductive years was sterilized to “protect the planet”.

Abortion is GOOD for the planet!!!

Meet the women who won't have babies - because they're not eco friendly!

Incredibly, instead of mourning the loss of a family that never was, her boyfriend (now husband) presented her with a congratulations card.

"It would have been immoral to give birth to a child that I felt strongly would only be a burden to the world. 

"I've never felt a twinge of guilt about what I did, and have honestly never wondered what might have been."

“Having children is selfish. It's all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet,” says Toni, 35.

“Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population.”

"What I consider mad are those women who ferry their children short distances in gas guzzling cars." 

“After my abortion, I was more determined than ever to pursue sterilization.”

So in this envirowacko's mind the planet is more important than we humans are.
There you go people. ABORTIONS are the way to save the planet!

This is not just stupidity, this is SICK!

For the record Toni Vernelli is a RADICAL environmentalist having supported organizations like PETA that have used violent terroristic tactics, such as firebombing, to support their hypocritical insane cause. Toni is the European Campaign Director for PETA.

In the Bible it warns or worshiping the creation (Earth) more than the God, The Creator.
These people just might want to think about that.

In all honesty I must say that I support her decision to be sterilized.  We don't need any more of these Liberal Envirowacko Kooks running around telling us how to live our lives!


The British Government is facing calls to discourage families from having more than two children to help the environment.

Call On Brits To Stop Breeding To Help The Environment.

The Optimum Population Trust, a UK-based think tank, made the call in a new report unveiled today, saying record growth in Britain's birth rate was having an adverse impact on the environment.

The report's author, Professor John Guillebaud, said the Government should introduce “stop at two children” or “have one less” policies.

“Each new UK birth, through the inevitable resource consumption and pollution that UK affluence generates, is responsible for about 160 times as much climate related environmental damage as a new birth in Ethiopia, or 35 times as much as a new birth in Bangladesh,” Prof Guillebaud's report says.

“A voluntary stop-at-two guideline should be adopted for couples in the UK who want to adopt greener lifestyles.

“It would aim to set an example.”


So now to help the planet we should limit how many children we can have?

We're being asked to give up our cars, stop eating meat, 
change all our light bulbs, 
and to even even stop having children?!!!

And these people claim that they are NOT extremists and the
Global Warming issue should have NO debate?!!!

Why don't all of you ENVIROWACKOS simply go Puck yourselves!

(did I spell that wrong?!)

Recycling is a waste of time, money,
and pollutes the Earth MORE!

Environmentalists have always told us that recycling is the responsible way to live and that it will help "save the planet".  Once again they are misinformed.  Why are we bothering to spend all this time, energy and money recycling paper, and using toxic chemicals that pollute the Earth to purify it when trees are a renewable source of paper?

I thought trees were good?!  The Envirowackos don't want trees cut down.
This is silly. When companies cut down trees to make paper and lumber they plant new trees because if they didn't they would have no continuing source of income.

Recycling is nothing more than "busy work".  That's work being created that doesn't really produce anything useful. And in the case of recycling it's costing us a lot of money, a lot of energy, and it's making even more pollution than it actually saves.

It costs America 8 billion dollars more in YOUR tax dollars per year to recycle.
Recycling is a LOSS, not a gain of money.

The ONLY product that actually makes money from recycling is aluminum.  Paper and plastic, and glass all cost us more to recycle than they do to simply make products from new materials.

Here is a quote: "Recycling may be the most wasteful activity in modern America.
A waste of time and money, a waste of human and natural resources".

Think that quote is from some Right wing conservative web site?  WRONG!!!
It is from the highly Liberal New York Times!

Listen to one woman's quote: "When I see someone not doing it (recycling) I just think less of them for not doing it".

That's it in a nutshell folks, environmentalists, and Liberals always seem to feel that THEY care more than the rest of us, and that we are uncaring MORONS. They think they are "better" than the rest of us, and that we are just stupid and evil.   Not quite.

The fact is that WE study the actual facts about environmental issues, and we see what's true, and what isn't based on science and economics.  The environmentalists tell us lies that the landfills are almost full, and that recycling costs less and pollutes the less. Once again they are LYING!

Actually the Methane gas emanating from landfills is now being collected and turned into electricity. 
Cheap, sensible electricity.  All the reasons the environmentalists tell us that recycling is good, are simply not true.

Watch Penn and Teller explain why recycling is a waste.
Of course the Wacko Liberals had this video removed because ONCE AGAIN
they don't want YOU to know the TRUTH.

Isn't it interesting how they keep removing videos and articles
that show the other side of the story?
It's like Socialism, Communism, Nazism, where they choke off ALL debate.
What these people are saying is;
"We're smarter than you. Now sit down and be quiet and just do what we say".

Here is a video by Penn and Teller that displays the idiocy of recycling.


 

HERE is a great article on the waste of recycling
Recycling: What a Waste!
Click Here to read: Recyling What A Waste!

By the way, if the envirowackos can come up with a plan for recycling that does not loose billions of dollars, and does not hurt the environment, I'd be all for it.  So far they have failed miserably at this.


 
This is how "Reasonable Environmentalists"
Debate Global warming.

When Gareth Groves brought home his new Hummer, he knew that his "environmentally friendly"neighbors disapproved, but he didn't expect what happened next. His Hummer was parked for five days on the street before two masked men smashed the windows, slashed the tires, and scratched into the body 'for the environ' "The thought of somebody vandalizing it never crossed my mind," says Gareth Groves, who lives near American University in northwest Washington. 

This just goes to show you how "reasonable" some of these wacko environmentalists are.
They want to DESTROY the vehicle YOU drive because THEY don't like it.

The interesting thing is that these people driving around in their Prius Hybrid cars who look down upon these "Environmental Sinner" Hummer drivers don't really know the TRUTH as usual.

Story: Prius causes more environmental damage
than a Hummer.
By Chris Demorro, Staff Writer

The Toyota Prius has become the flagship car for those in our society so environmentally conscious that they are willing to spend a premium to show the world how much they care. Unfortunately for them, their ultimate 'green car' is the source of some of the worst pollution in 
North America; it takes more combined energy per Prius to produce than a Hummer or an Escalade

Building a Toyota Prius causes more environmental damage than a Hummer that is on the road for three times longer than a Prius. The Prius is partly driven by a battery which contains nickel. 
The nickel is mined and smelted at a plant in Sudbury, Ontario. 
This plant has caused so much environmental damage to the surrounding environment that NASA has used the 'dead zone' around the plant to test moon rovers. The area around the plant is devoid of any life for miles

The plant is the source of all the nickel found in a Prius' battery and Toyota purchases 1,000 tons annually. Dubbed the Superstack, the plague-factory has spread sulfur dioxide across northern Ontario, becoming every environmentalist's nightmare. 

"The acid rain around Sudbury was so bad it destroyed all the plants nd the soil slid down off the hillside," said Canadian Greenpeace energy-coordinator David Martin during an interview with Mail, a British based newspaper.
 

There is much more to this article, I suggest you read the whole thing.

Story: Prius causes more environmental damage than Hummer.


All over the United States the REAL environmental terrorists are are setting fires to SUV's and burning down car dealerships in a sick form of protest against to these vehicles.
these people are Domestic Terrorists who should be SHOT ON SIGHT!


This is just brilliant behavior by these deep thinkers.  They burn the SUV's and the dealerships releasing massive amounts of toxic fumes and creating a true environmental nightmare.

Does this solve ANYTHING? Of course not. The SUV's are replaced, and the dealerships are rebuilt, which takes more energy, and costs everyone more in higher insurance rates. So these extreme violent acts, which are becoming more and more common, actually make the problem worse.

Let's also be realistic here. These are the people telling us if we must drive (like that's a sin!) that we should carpool.
So how many people can you realistically fit into a Prius and get it to go faster than 30 miles an hour?!

What's wrong with buying an SUV and carrying around a bunch of children and groceries that need a large vehicle to be able to fit them all into?

Well, believe it or not now some environmentalists are trying to tell us it is environmentally irresponsible to have too many children because we are simply creating more "Earth destroying polluters"!!!  Think I'm exaggerating here?  Try reading this article:

Call On Brits To Stop Breeding To Help The Environment.
 

 


 

This is the SENSIBLE solution for our energy needs.

Open ANWR for oil drilling!
Drilling would be limited to only 2000 acres of the 19 MILLION acres of ANWR!
That's only 0.01% of the entire refuge!
That is only 0.006% of all of Alaska!

It's only 3 square miles in size!  That's a pinpoint!
Let me repeat that. IT'S ONLY 3 SQUARE MILES!

There are no trees there, no lakes, or no mountains.
It is a flat, barren wasteland.

ANWR would produce 1 million barrels of oil a day, 20% of our daily needs.
ANWR - Jobs and Energy for America!

Click Here to learn more about the TRUTH behind ANWR.
ANWR would help save the Rain forests!

The Liberal Envirowackos are INSANE for not letting us drill there!
It was Jimmy Carter who set aside ANWR for oil drilling in 1980.
John Kerry says drilling for oil in ANWR is a "national security risk"!
Is he FREAKING NUTS?!!! 
NOT drilling presents a far greater risk because we should be
securing our OWN oil in the United States.

 

This is great site!!!
Carbon Credit Killers.com
Increasing Your Carbon Footprint...

 I'm doing my part by using as much oil, gas, water
and electricity as possible. Vroom Vroom!
Cut down a tree today,
just to piss the Envirowackos off!


 
 Natural Oil "Spills"

Scientists Find That Tons Of Oil
Seep Into The Gulf Of Mexico Each Year.


Twice an Exxon Valdez spill worth of oil seeps into the Gulf of Mexico every year, but the oil isn't destroying habitats or wiping out ocean life.

The ooze is a natural phenomena that's been going on for many thousands of years, according to Roger Mitchell, Vice President of Program Development at the Earth Satellite Corporation (EarthSat) in Rockville Md. "The wildlife have adapted and evolved and have no problem dealing with the oil" he said. 

Oil that finds its way to the surface from natural seeps gets broken down by bacteria and ends up as carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. So knowing the amount of fossil fuel that turns to carbon dioxide naturally is important for understanding how much humans may be changing the climate by burning oil and gas.

Using a technique they developed in the early 1990s to help explore for oil in the deep ocean, Earth Satellite Corporation scientists found that there are over 600 different areas where oil oozes from rocks underlying the Gulf of Mexico. The oil bubbles up from a cracks in ocean bottom sediments and spreads out with the wind to an to an area covering about 4 square miles. 

"It's happening off the coast of California also. These are just the areas we can explore, a minuscule part of the oceans, it's probably happening at thousands, or tens of thousands of places in the Earth's seas.  It could literally be tens of thousands of barrels of oil escaping naturally into the sea each day.  It could be far more.  We really have no idea how wide the scope of this is but we're finding it everywhere."

These are called "oil whips' which happen naturally by escaping oil on the sea floor.
Maybe we need to drill MORE oil there to stop this!

So it's the Earth itself and NOT man that's causing Global Warming?!!!
Wait the oil we burn turns into Co2, and the naturally escaping oil turns into Co2
WE'RE DOOMED!!!
I'm so confused right now LOL!!!
I hope Al Gore will be able to explain this to me better!

They might be able to say that one day if they can ever PROVE that Co2 causes
Global Warming, which they haven't.


Remember people, if you even want to debate 
Global Warming YOU'RE a NAZI appeaser!
The Live Earth Concert
Was it a FAILURE?
While the Live Earth Concert held on July 7, 2007 was a huge event it may not have been be as big as first reported.  In an interview during the concert Al Gore said that "this was the biggest entertainment event in history."
That, like Global Warming itself, is questionable. 
CLICK HERE to view Al Gore state this misinformation.
Al Gore,exaggerating AGAIN!

Reuters reported that the globe spanning Live Earth pop music extravaganza fell flat for television viewers in the United States and Britain, drawing far smaller audiences than the Princess Diana tribute concert a week earlier. 

The main three hour American TV broadcast on NBC averaged a meager 2.7 million viewers, ranking Live Earth as the least watched U.S. program on that Saturday night and falling below NBC's normal summer prime time Saturday average, Nielsen Media Research reported.

ABC's cartoon movie rerun, and CBS's news program blew the Live Earth concerts ratings away.

By comparison, NBC, averaged 8.8 million viewers with its broadcast of the memorial concert for the late Princess Diana the previous Sunday.

It was the same story in Britain, where BBC One coverage of the Live Earth climax at London's Wembley Stadium, leading up to Madonna's eagerly awaited finale, averaged 3.1 million viewers, compared with 11.4 million for the Princess Diana tribute.

The overall numbers amounted to a small fraction of the 2 billion people that Live Earth organizer
Al Gore said that the event was reaching.  Al Gore not telling the truth?  Oh my!

At Giants Stadium in New Jersey where The Police and Bon Jovi played, the show didn't even sell out.  These two groups could sell out the stadium on their own, but it turns out many people didn't want to be forced into hearing the message that was being rammed down their throats.

At one point during the concert a plane flew near Giants Stadium with a banner reading:
"Don't believe Al Gore!"
Demand Al Gore debate Global Warming!

Demand Al Gore debate Global Warming!
Demand Debate.com

Here are some comments from different news stories surrounding the event.

Despite the overtly green theme of the concert, Gore's message of doing one's part in the fight against climate change fell on many deaf ears, at least in Giants Stadium.

"There are people at this event who are not picking up their trash, the place was a mess"
said Clive Hall, a bartender and deejay from Brooklyn, N.Y.

Cassie Taylor of N.J. said that she was a huge Police and Bon Jovi fan but that she didn't want the environmental issues forced upon her for 8 hours. "I know how to save water, I know how to turn off the lights, I don't need an all day lecture on something as questionable as Global Warming forced upon me when I'm at a concert trying to have fun."

John Foran said "I think it's hugely hypocritical that these musicians and actors who live such a high end, energy sucking lifestyle are preaching to me to give up my car and ride a bike to work."

Edward Perkins mused "It was just as I predicted, at one point in the concert, when Melissa Etheridge it turned into an anti war, anti Bush fest and I could see this was about a lot more than normal environmentalism.  The whole message turned out to be that we are all greedy Capitalist pigs who need to learn to live with less. The problem is that the biggest Capitalist pigs in the stadium were right down there on the stage."

Some of the performers openly admitted to being relatively uninformed. Akon, a singer who has spent much of the year at the top of the charts, admitted to not knowing what "green" meant until the day of the show, and said that he had then decided not to perform because he "wanted to be more educated about it."

Speaking of the performers where were the A-listers on the bill?

How come the biggest performers in the world were conspicuously absent from the show? 
Where was hometown boy Bruce Springsteen?  How about U2? Barbara Striesand is a HUGE Global Warming advocate. How come she didn't show up?


Many performers said at the show that we should "Think For Yourself" or were telling people to get educated and ask questions.  But we all know that Al Gore doesn't want any more education on this issue, he doesn't want any more questions, because Reverend Gore preaches that the debate is over.

The debate is NOT over, in fact it's just begun.

I'M NOT STUPID, AND I'M NOT EVIL
because I don't believe your Global Warming
is destroying the Earth propaganda

That's part of the problem with this whole environmentalist movement.  I'm a free American. 
I don't need to be told to save energy, re-use toilet paper, or to grow grass on my roof to insulate it better.  Yes, folks, that is one of Bill Clinton's recent tidbits of advice in a speech he gave recently!
Has anyone looked at his NY mansion and seen the grass growing on the roof?  I doubt it!

I'm an educated man, I don't need to be told what to do.
I also resent being told to follow the lemmings blindly when there are clearly many more questions than answers to this situation. 

I don't like being told that I should NOT investigate this issue any more, that I should not be truly educated, and that I should NOT question your shaky conclusions.

And I don't like how these environmentalists are telling our children that we are destroying the Earth and indoctrinating in the same manner that Hitler's youth were indoctrinated with lies.

It's funny, Roger Waters played at the concert and he played the song "Another Brick In The Wall".  I found it very ironic when the lyrics said "We don't need no education, we don't need no thought control" but that's EXACTLY what they are doing to us and our children.

During one show they had a little 5 year old girl on and she was talking about how in the sea sometimes the bigger fish eat smaller fish. She said "but that's' OK, because that's nature."

So it is evident that this child has been indoctrinated with the idea that it's OK for nature to be on the Earth, but we, as men, are intruders.  That's the way environmentalists think.

So it's OK for a lion to chase down and antelope and kill it and eat it, but it's unnatural for me as a man to shoot a deer and kill it and eat it?

Let me let all of you environmentalists on a little secret, man IS a part of nature also and we have a right to be here and use resources just like nature does. 

We have a right to eat, and we have a right to chop down trees and build houses.

The Earth is here for man to use also, it's not just for the penguins and the polar bears.


I'm a conservative and a conservationist too.  I think we should be conservative with our resources and our money.  I don't want dirty air or water either. I would like a cleaner planet.

But that doesn't mean that I need to be preached to like they did for 22 hours at that concert on how should act to "Save The Earth".

I don't like being lied to by people telling me that we are DOOMED unless we do the things that THEY say (and many times do not do themselves like Al Gore and RFK Jr. flying around in gas guzzling private jets).  These people are ENVIROWACKOS, people that have taken simple, sensible conservationism into a totally wacko extreme.

I already know how to turn off the lights when I'm not in a room.  It's saves me on the electric bill, and it makes no sense to waste that energy for no reason. ANY moron should be able to figure that out!  The one's who don't understand that are kids, and those people who don't actually pay the electric bill.

I already know not to toss garbage out of the window of my car. I know not to run the shower for 30 minutes after I get out of it.  But NO ONE is going to tell me I can only shower for 3 minutes because I pay both the water bill and the gas bill, and If I want to take a 10 or 20 minute shower, I will.

I don't need politicians, musicians, and actors giving me either common sense ideas, and I especially don't need them telling me all their wacko ideas on how to save energy.

The truth is the we ARE all doomed!  Each one of us will die one day.  And a few millions years from now the Sun will explode and burn the Earth to a crisp. Or a huge volcano, a natural part of the environment, will explode and destroy the Earth. 

Or maybe an asteroid will collide with Earth and wipe us all out like it did to the dinosaurs. 
Either way we AND the planet will all be gone.
But it's NOT going to vanish 50 years from now because of this made up scare of Global Warming by raising the Earth's temperature by 1/4 of a degree. 

My religion tells me in the Bible to worship God, our creator, NOT to worship Mother Earth, the creation.

New York City is NOT going to be under 20 feet of water in 50 years like Al Gore and his wacko extremist buddies claim.  It might, however, be a city turned into dust by Radical Islamics who have vowed to destroy us.

While the REAL World War 3 has been declared upon us by Radical Islamics, and is happening RIGHT NOW, Al Gore is more worried about the gasoline engine destroying us.

Meanwhile while we do have electric engines that can be put into cars, and low cost POLLUTION FREE nuclear power that can fuel those engines the Envirowackos say that's not a viable alternative.

All they offer are "solutions" that will not work and tell us to simply "use less".

We have a world to run here. We HAVE the energy, YOU people go right ahead and "use less".

We're going to make a more productive world, feed more people, and bring more people out of poverty by using MORE energy, and there is NOTHING wrong with that.

Now please, all you ENVIROWACKOS get out of our way while we fix the problems YOU and your Liberal buddies have created.


Weather Channel founder John Coleman advocates suing Al Gore to expose 'the fraud of global warming'.   March 4, 2008 

The Weather Channel has lost its way, according to John Coleman, who founded the channel in 1982.

Coleman told an audience at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change on March 3 in New York that he is highly critical of global warming alarmism. 

“The Weather Channel had great promise, and that’s all gone now because they’ve made every mistake in the book on what they’ve done and how they’ve done it and it’s very sad,” Coleman said. 

Click Here to read the article.

Click Here to read an interview with John Coleman.

Click Here to see The Weather Channel founder John Coleman advocate the suing of Al Gore for the fraud of global warming.
Click Here to see the video.

One of the most important outcomes of The 2008 International Conference on Climate Change in New York City conference was the production of the Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change, a copy of which you can read below. 
 
 
Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change

We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,

Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;

Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;

Recognising that the causes and extent of recently-observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed ‘consensus’ among climate experts are false;

Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing human suffering;

Noting that warmer weather is generally less harmful to life on Earth than colder:

Hereby declare:

That current plans to restrict anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a dangerous misallocation of intellectual capital and resources that should be dedicated to solving humanity’s real and serious problems.

That there is no convincing evidence that CO2 emissions from modern industrial activity has in the past, is now, or will in the future cause catastrophic climate change.

That attempts by governments to inflict taxes and costly regulations on industry and individual citizens with the aim of reducing emissions of CO2 will pointlessly curtail the prosperity of the West and progress of developing nations without affecting climate.

That adaptation as needed is massively more cost-effective than any attempted mitigation, and that a focus on such mitigation will divert the attention and resources of governments away from addressing the real problems of their peoples.

That human-caused climate change is not a global crisis.

Now, therefore, we recommend –

That world leaders reject the views expressed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as popular, but misguided works such as “An Inconvenient Truth”.

That all taxes, regulations, and other interventions intended to reduce emissions of CO2 be abandoned forthwith.

If you would like to publicly endorse Heartland Institutes declaration on climate change please email tom.harris@climatescienceinternational.net

INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE SCIENCE COALITION

More Global Warming Links

Global Warming is a Farce

Global Warming and Junk Science

Guess what? Antarctica's getting colder, not warmer!

Global Warming Is The Greatest Hoax Ever

New Research Indicates the Earth May Be Cooling

Global Cooling -- Newsweek Magazine .pdf file

Eco-Freaks: Environmentalism Is Hazardous to Your Health! 

Just like Y2K, Global Warming Is A Hoax

I've got many more links to post, check back soon to see the updates.

 


 
Here's a new documentary called
Global Warming - Doomsday Called Off!

It uses actual SCIENCE to disprove manmade Global Warming.
It also destroys Al Gore's "hockey stick' graph.
It is in five parts.


Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5


 

Ban DHMO
Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide!!!

While Al Gore and the leftist media all cry about Global Warming they are also participating in a massive cover-up about Dihydrogen Monoxide.  Why aren't they warning us about this real ENVIRONMENTAL NIGHTMARE
Is it because there's no money in it for them?

What is DHMO?

Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) is a colorless and odorless chemical compound, also referred to by some as Dihydrogen Oxide, Hydrogen Hydroxide, Hydronium Hydroxide, or simply Hydric Acid

It's basis is the highly reactive hydroxyl radical, a species shown to mutate DNA, denature proteins, disrupt cell membranes, and chemically alter critical neurotransmitters.

The atomic components of DHMO are found in a number of caustic, explosive and poisonous compounds such as Sulfuric Acid, Nitroglycerine, and Ethyl Alcohol. In humans it can cause caustic skin burns, vomiting, diarrhea and even DEATH in just small amounts!  It has show up in cancerous tumors and still born babies.

It is used as an industrial solvent and coolant, and in the production of Styrofoam.  It is also a major component of acid rain. DHMO is even used in the manufacture in chemical and nuclear weapons!

In it's gaseous form it can even be used as a weapon!

Dihydrogen Monoxide

But the government, and the evil Capitalist corporations have tried to convince the American people that this substance is basically harmless.

It's no wonder that DHMO has even been used by Republican members of Congress who are under investigation for financial corruption and inappropriate Congressional behavior (it figures those anti Global Warming Capitalist scum would be involved in this!)
But that charlatan Democratic Presidential Candidate John Edwards has also been caught making money by selling DHMO!

The TRUTH is that almost every one of the top major corporations operating in the United States uses this as a cleaning solvent on a daily basis!

It's all about corporate profits and NOTabout saving the environment as usual!
(Those greedy Capitalist PIGS!!!)

The problem is so bad now that DHMO is showing up in municipal water supplies all across the country at record levels!  Why isn't Al Gore warning us about this?!!!

Yet in a massive conspiracy, the government warns that supplies of this chemical solvent are actually low! (It's probably all been used up by our troops in Iraq! That's what Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and Barbara Boxer have said!) 

The government has the nerve to claim that it's the lack of acid rainfall has contributed to this substance being scarce in some regions of the country.  Do they think we are that stupid simply because most people don't even know what Dihydrogen Monoxide really is?!!!

The truth is that George Bush knew there were extremely high levels of DHMO in the flood waters of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina!  Displaying his Presidential irresponsibility once more, he even shipped MORE of it into Louisiana during the crisis!

But the scariest part of all of this is that DHMO is now prevalent in our food supply, and even our babies food:(  It has even shown up in mothers milk. (I'm close to tears now!)

It has been reported that terrorist organizations such as al Quaedaare attempting to procure mass quantities of this substance. That, of course, must be George Bush's fault also, after all it was also used liberally in Hitler's death camps! 

Bush authorized our military to bring massive quantities of this substance to his illegal war in Iraq. 

Of course, our evil United States military machine has even found a way to make DHMO out of ordinary sea water! (They think we don't know about this!)
This is what they waste our tax dollars on, while they line their pockets with DHMO blood money.

Forget blood diamonds, forget oil, companies are making a larger profit on this chemical compound than the oil companies make on gasoline!  It's all a big cover-up folks!

DHMO is found on EVERY Air Force bomber, EVERY Navy destroyer ship, EVERY Coast Guard helicopter, EVERY Army tank and Humvee, and EVERY nuclear sub in our military arsenal.
It's frightening to think about what they could do with this chemical compound!

Unbelievably, DHMO is now even BEING SOLD TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC (for huge profits by Capitalist Pigs) with very little government regulation.

This has got to stop!!!
It is time to
Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide!!!

Thank Goodness we have the Liberal Environmentalists to save us from this horror!
Please save us again Al Gore!!!

When asked if they would sign a petition banning Dihydrogen Monoxide, also known as DHMO, close to 90% of the people at an environmental rally signed the petition to try and FORCE the government to ban it.

Watch the clip to learn more about this substance.
(This is a VERY popular clip, it may take a minute to load.)
Click Here to watch people sign the anti Dihydrogen Monoxide petition.

That's right, these thoughtful environmentalists
signed a petition for banning this very scary sounding substance.

Oh Yeah, did I forget to mention what
Dihydrogen Monoxide really is?

It's chemical composition is actually H2O!

That's right these same Global Warming fanatics want to ban
WATER!!!

Don't tell me these Global Warming fools haven't been sucked in by mass hysteria!

This displays how with the environmentalists it's ALL about emotion,
and has NOTHING to do with the science. 

See how easy it is to fool an envirowacko?!!!

Facts about Dihydrogen Monoxide

By the way, it is an ironic fact that DiHydrogen Monoxide IS also a
major contributor of "Greenhouse Gasses". I kid you not.

WATER VAPOR in the CLIMATE SYSTEM

Let's ban it now and stop this MADNESS!!!

FACT: Al Gore likes to say that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day. What he probably doesn't know is that mother nature puts 24,000 times that amount of our main greenhouse gas -- water vapor -- into the atmosphere every day. - Dr. Roy Spencer.

 


 
I just can't resist. Here's a few more blasts of Co2 for Al Gore,
The Ultimate Hypocrite.

Can you save Al Gore?

 

Al Gore's Burning Ball of Fire!


 
 
 Good News!

Yes, it's possible to have good news about the planet and about Global Warming.
Life isn't all about gloom and doom like the liberal media espouses.

This web page has gotten so much positive response that I'm going to have to expand it.  I'm being emailed every day by people who want more information on all of this.
You're words of encouragement mean the world to me.

I'm getting very little negative mail about this page, maybe one out of fifty positive letters.

Soon I will add a Global Warming news page that will talk about all the current news about Global Warming.

I will put on display all the ridiculous claims of the Global Warming kooks.
But I'll also be putting up more evidence against this Global Warming hoax.

There is so much factual evidence pouring in about how Global Warming is just a big hoax that this page can no longer handle it all.  So I will expand this site as I have time to do so.

The fact is that there is far more evidence AGAINST Global Warming than there is to support it, and all the evidence supporting Global Warming is crumbling around the envirowackos.

Meanwhile Al Gore still REFUSES to debate the so called facts proving the existence of Global Warming.

So you people just SHUT UP and believe Al Gore!
That's the way HE wants it!

What a moron he is thinking we would all fall for this.
The tide is turning against the Global Warming crowd because they refuse to back up their assertions with facts or even debate them.  What are these people so afraid of?

One new tactic these envirowackos is that they are not using the term "Global Warming" as much as they used to.  Now they are calling it "Climate Change".

Don't let them fool you. All this is a way for them to play BOTH sides of the fence.
This way if it's hot, it's because of mans effect on "Climate Change", if it's cold it's because of man's effect on "Climate Change".

Isn't it great when these people can NEVER be wrong AND they never have to debate it!  I'm sorry, if you are falling for all this without the science backing you up, you are simply being ignorant.  Get educated to the REAL facts.




By the way,  I do apologize to the parents and the children for some of the language I've used on this page.  I didn't mean to offend you.  I meant to offend Al Gore and the other EnviroNazis who are trying to tell the rest of us how to live our lives because of their emotions which are NOT based on scientific proof.  But MY emotions get the best of me when I hear these people LYING day after day to to everyone, especially our innocent children.

But sometimes you just have to call a jerk, a JERK
Al Gore is FAR worse than a jerk.  He's a lying, hypocritical ass.
And I'm not going to apologize for saying that!

Kids, you don't have to join the envirowackos sick religion, and that's just what it is.  Don't let these people infect your mind.  They are simply trying to CONTROL you, NOT save the planet. The polar bears aren't going to die, and everything will be just fine.  Without Co2 we would all die.  Carbon dioxide is what we all breathe out, it's not going to kill us all.

We can all still care about the planet without buying twirly little lightbulbs!


This web page is still under construction.
I will be adding many more links and PROOF about The Great Global Warming Scam.
I may even have to make this into an entire web site.

I've received some letters asking how much Exxon is paying me to write this page.
I will admit they pay me 4 billion dollars a year to write this page!

You people are ridiculous!  ANYONE who disagrees with you, you acuse of being paid off.  Yet you have the nerve to stand there and tell us we should not debate the issue.
Of course you're only doing that because you KNOW the science isn't backing you up.
The TWISTED "facts" you presented before are being exposed for the LIES that they are.

I have NO connection whatsoever to the energy industry, and that I am not being paid to write this page by anyone, in any way, shape, or form.

I do not work in the energy industry, or any offshoot of it.  In fact I actually work for a form of a pro environmental company.

I pay for this page out of my own pocket and accept NO money from ANY corporation or from ANY other source.  These are my opinions, unlike Al Gore's, that are based totally on FACTS!   Hey Al, where's yours, you hockey stick head?!!!

Shred, 2008



Site Links
The Great Global Warming Swindle
The Religion of Environmentalism
Consensus is NOT Science
Global Warming Causes EVERYTHING!
The Global Warming Scare Is All About Politics
Al Gore's Silly Earth Pledge
The False Global Warming Temperature Readings
The Sea Ice ISN'T Melting!
The Failed Kyoto Treaty
Environmentalists Have No Energy Solutions
The Cooling World
Recycling Creates Pollution
Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green
Terrorist Environmentalists
Ethanol is IMMORAL!
ANWR - The Sensible Solution
Compact Florescent Light Bulbs
Are DANGEROUS!
Cash In Your Carbon Credits
The Carbon Offset Scam
More Global Warming Links
We're DOOMED!
Al Gore's Personal Hypocrisy
No Energy In The Energy Bill?!!!
The Failed Live Earth Concerts
Abort Your Baby To Save The Planet!
Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide - DHMO!

The video clips on this page can be seen with the
FREE Real Player available HERE.
Please give them a minute to load.


 

Back to BobbyShred's Home Page



webmaster@aol.com