You've been hoodwinked, bamboozled, and SWINDLED by 
Al Gore and his leftist buddies in the media.

Al Gore says that NO scientists disagree with him and that the debate is OVER! 

The TRUTH is Al Gore REFUSES to debate ANY of his critics.

There are now over 20,000 signatures by scientists and on a petition against Groomsman made Global Warming assertions.

While Gore flies gas guzzling private jets to all his events, and uses more than 20 times the electricity than most Americans, he also sells himself useless "Carbon Offsets", through a company he owns!   What a crock of bullcrap!

Instead of investigating with scientific fact, Al Gore has turned Global Warming into a RELIGION that he allows NO ONE to question.

Does Al Gore really believe in catastrophic global warming that he preaches about?

Since Al Gore was offered the opportunity (in person) to facilitate serious debate on the underlying science of global climate change but he has REFUSED every single opportunity to do so.

Earlier in the month The 2008 International Conference on Climate Change was held in New York and even though they offered Gore his normal $200,000.00 fee to speak at it,  but he refused to show up.

So in Al Gore's mind, if a scientist disputes his man made Global Warming theory than they are no smarter than someone who lived 600 years ago!  Give me a break!  Click Here to see the video clip where Al Gore smugly tells us why we should not even debate Global Warming.

No REAL scientist would EVER do that.  But of course, Al Gore ISN'T a scientist, he's simply a politician.  In his speech to the Nobel committee he compared the rest of us who don't buy his drivel of unproven junk science to Nazi sympathizers.  You've got some set of coconuts on you Al!

The Nobel Peace Prize is given out by this mandate by it's founder, Alfred Nobel:
Nobel said; The prize should be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

How then does a non-scientist like Al Gore get a "Peace Prize" for something that has NOTHING to do with world peace?!

Here's the kicker that shows you Al Gore is a mindless idiot.

He has said that Global Warming is both inevitable and reversible.  Never have I hear two more incongruent words in all of my life.

Al, you mindless idiot, anything that is INEVITABLE by definition CANNOT be REVERSIBLE!

We are all Carbon based life forms. We all need Oxygen to live. Plants need CO2 to live on.
Simple Carbon and Oxygen is CO2, Carbon Dioxide. CO2 is NOT a pollutant.

My goodness Gore, where did you go to school?!!!  Did you really think we were going to buy this crap?!!!
 

Hey Al Gore,  I thought the science was "settled"? What is Al Gore smoking?!!! Click Here to find out!

FACT: Al Gore says that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day.  What he doesn't tell you is that mother nature puts 24,000 times that amount of our main greenhouse gas -- water vapor -- into the atmosphere every day!

SOURCE: Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville, former NASA scientist.

In Al Gore's Oscar winning film on global warming "An Inconvenient Truth." There's a scene in that movie that shows the Antarctic ice shelf breaking up and virtually disintegrating. The problem is that wasn't ice!  It was Styrofoam!!!  He used a computer generated image! ABC News is reporting that Al Gore took that footage from the FICTIONAL movie "The Day After Tomorrow" and used it in his documentary. Way to go Al!  That ice is just about as fake as you are. Click Here to see the video!

Some people are now saying that Al Gore should run for President again since he's won an Oscar and the Nobel Peace Prize. Let me make one thing PERFECTLY clear.  Al Gore will NEVER run for President again. Why?  Plain and simple.  Because if he did he'd HAVE to debate Global Warming and he'll NEVER do that because he knows the science doesn't back him up.

Al Gore says "This is one of the strongest of scientific consensus views in the history of science". "There is very little dispute about global warming," he added. No, not to a man who refuses to debate the issue! "There has been an organized campaign, financed to the tune of about $10 million a year from some of the largest carbon polluters, to create the impression that there is disagreement in the scientific community," Gore said at a forum in Singapore.  "In actuality, there is very little disagreement."

Let's get one thing straight right away: CONSENSUS IS NOT SCIENCE!

A "consensus" does not equate to fact. When scientists can use the Scientific Method to prove that global warming is caused by humans, then and ONLY then can it be accepted as fact.

The encyclopedia defines what the word "consensus" really means:

"Consensus has two common meanings. One is a general agreement among the members of a given group or community, each of which exercises some discretion in decision making and follow up action. The other is as a theory and practice of getting such agreements.

Achieving consensus requires serious treatment of every group member's considered opinion. Once a decision is made it is important to trust in members' discretion in follow up action. In the ideal case, those who wish to take up some action want to hear those who oppose it, because they count on the fact that the ensuing debate will improve the consensus. In theory, action without resolution of considered opposition will be rare and done with attention to minimize damage to relationships."

Al Gore and the other Global Warming purveyors REFUSE to even listen to the other side about the issue of Global Warming.

They wants all the rest of us to take action but they do not want to hear from the opposition. And by taking action all they really mean is raising our taxes.

The TRUTH is that there is a VERY strong disagreement about so called Global Warming. 

In a recent poll of scientists the vote was close to 50/50 as the whether Global Warming even exists!  That's NOT a consensus, that's an ELECTION!

Al Gore says "There has been an organized campaign, financed to the tune of about $10 million a year from some of the largest carbon polluters, to create the impression that there is disagreement in the scientific community".

What Gore fails to mention is that the promoters of Global Warming propaganda have been estimated to have spent close to 50 BILLION DOLLARS in the form of various government grants, university grants, corporate donations, and private donations.
Al Gore's Live Earth concerts cost far more than $10 million dollars to put on.

The fact is that there is SERIOUS disagreement in the "scientific community" about the existence of Global Warming.

And why is Gore using the words "scientific community" and "consensus" at the same time anyway?

Global Warming has not been put to the test by the "Scientific Method" as explained in the encyclopedia:

"The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and integrating previous knowledge. It is based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning, the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.

The advantage of the scientific method is that it is unprejudiced. One can test an experiment and determine whether his/her results are true or false. The conclusions will hold regardless of the state of mind, or the bias of the investigator and/or the subject of the investigation. 

Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methodologies of knowledge. Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies that test these hypotheses for accuracy."

Author Michael Crichton said it best:

"Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.

"Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus."

"Consensus is the business of politics.  Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.  In science consensus is irrelevant.  What IS relevant is reproducible results. 
The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus."

Al Gore's "consensus" is NOT science, it is simply a VOTE by some scientists.

Al Gore's Global Warming claims have NOT been tested as MUST happen according to the Scientific Method.  And as far as the evidence is concerned, there is quite a lot of evidence to suggest that Global Warming is NOT happening.

New ice core samples, faulty temperature gathering methods, and the growth of new icebergs in Antarctica are just a few examples of how the REAL science disagrees with Al Gore's assertions.

But then again he allows NO debate on the issue of Global Warming because this is not really science for him, it's his RELIGION!

A perceived slowdown in circulation, linked to global warming, may actually have been normal variations in the flow pattern.
By Alan Zarembo,   August 17, 2007 

A massive ocean circulation pattern that plays a crucial role in shaping the world's climate may not have been slowing down over the last few decades as scientists previously believed, according to a study released Thursday.

The perceived slowdown had been considered alarming support for computer predictions that global warming would disrupt the planet's heat regulation.

In a single year of measurements, published in today's issue of the journal Science, the scientists found enough normal variation in the pattern to suggest that previous studies were premature in asserting a long term trend.

"We can't strictly say they are wrong, but we can have an alternative explanation," said coauthor Torsten O. Kanzow, an oceanographer at the National Oceanography Center in Southampton, England.

"Despite their own findings, many of the researchers believe that a slowdown is occurring. 
But they lack proof."

"Despite their own findings" . . . do you mean the actual SCIENCE that says warming may NOT be happening, some scientists still believe in Global Warming?
Even though they "lack proof"?  Sounds like a religion to me.

Al Gore has stated that Global Warming is NOT a political issue, that it's NOT a right vs. left issue, it's about science.  We now all know that Mr. Gore will not debate the science and that the issue is closed in his mind.
Of course, that's not how science works.  So it's NOT about the science for him, it's about his beliefs, because he refuses to debate the science in any way. Gore tells us we can no longer question the science.   Why not?  Isn't that how real science works???
 

Robert Kennedy Jr. spoke at the Live Earth concert. This is what he had to say: KENNEDY: "I'm going to tell you this, that the next time you see John Stossel or Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity -- these flat-earthers, these corporate toadies -- lying to you, lying to the American public, and telling you that global warming doesn't exist, you send an e-mail to their advertisers and tell them you're not going to buy their products anymore!"

He went on to say:  "It is MORE important than buying compact fluorescent light bulbs or than buying a fuel efficient automobile."
"The most important thing you can do is to get involved in the POLITICAL PROCESS".

Wait a minute here! "The most important thing you can do is to get involved in the

I thought this was about the SCIENCE and NOT about POLITICS?
The Global Warming crowd have finally let the truth out, it IS about politics for them.
 

Let's examine what RFK Jr. said.  He mentioned Glenn Beck as being a Global Warming denier. CLICK HERE to watch this short video clip from the documentary "Exposed: The Climate Of Fear" in which Glenn Beck says he DOES believe in global warming.  He's only questioning all of Al Gore's claims concerning it. So right away we know that Robert Kennedy Jr. is LYING about what Glenn Beck said!

RFK Jr. also mentioned John Stossel as being a "corporate toadie" who also denies Global Warming. CLICK HERE to watch this video clip where John Stossel confronts RFK Jr. and says he DOES believe in global warming.  John Stossel is only questioning all of RFK Jr.'s claims and solutions about Global Warming yet RFK Jr. calls him a liar and does so again in this clip. Just like Al Gore, RFK Jr. says we can't even question the science on this issue.  I guess they are simply smarter than we are. Please give the Real Player clips a minute to load

On August 15, 2007 Rush Limbaugh said "I know people are starting to pound me out there for saying this whole global warming thing is a hoax.  Let me clarify.  We MAY be warming up.  What IS a hoax is that only rich industrialized nations are causing it, and that it is manmade." "The whole thing is a political process and a political agenda, hiding behind the saving of the planet and so forth.  I don't know if it's warming up or not, but I think it's ALWAYS warming or cooling.  How do we know what the ideal temperature of the planet is? "

Then he talks about a "consensus" of scientists agree about Global Warming. 
A "consensus" of people is simply a group of people agreeing on something, but a consensus is NOT science, it is simply a bunch of opinions. It is basically an election.

The TRUTH is that there is a MUCH larger consensus of scientists who believe this is all just bull, and there is REAL science to disprove all this Global Warming hysteria.
 

Kennedy says "Just go outside... you can just feel how hot it has been recently".  That's REAL SCIENCE all right!!! Robert Kennedy Jr. is the only "Toad" here!

Listen to ME!

Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh have both also said that Global Warming may be happening they too are simply are questioning the SCIENCE about it, and not the hysterical propaganda the environmentalists are spewing. Both of these men have mentioned, among other things, that maybe it's simply the sun, which has been scientifically proven to have been getting hotter, that could be causing this.  Seasons of the Sun

So it's seems what RFK Jr. said, that these 4 men are "Global Warming Deniers" is NOT true.
Of course honesty has always seemed to be a problem with the Kennedy men, but that's a whole other issue!

Kennedy went on to say: "of all these rotten politicians that we have in Washington, DC, who are nothing more than corporate toadies for companies like Exxon and Southern Company, these villainous companies that consistently put their private financial interests ahead of American interests and ahead of the interests of all humanity.  This is treason, and we need to start treating them now as traitors, and they have their -- their slick public relations firms and their phony think tanks in Washington, DC, and their crooked scientists who are lying to the American people day after day after day, and we have a press that has completely let done American democracy."

This is pure Socialist propaganda, to claim that corporations are evil and must be stopped.
This coming from a man, RFK Jr., who, like Al Gore, flies around in private jets and lives off of his families multi million dollar CORPORATE trust fund that partially came from OIL STOCKS!

So anyone, even a scientist, questioning Global Warming, is a traitor in his mind.  Unbelievable.

I thought Global Warming was a "science" issue.  I thought it was ALL about the science! 
That's what THEY said!   No, of course it's not!  It's about politics; it's about socialism, big government, liberalism, whatever -- and Bobby Kennedy Jr. doesn't like the fact he can't control all these people and make them see the world the way he wants them to see it because they see through his hoax.

Why is Exxon traitor? 
In the Liberal mind ALL corporations are traitors because Liberals hate Capitalism and think that it is ALL corrupt.
Exxon brings us the cheapest gasoline in the world and does a great service for us. 
So why does RFK Jr. consider them evil (as he pumps Exxon's jet fuel into his private jet)?

Name me ONE other liquid product in the grocery store that sells for less than $3.00 a gallon?
Ketchup, Mustard, Mayonnaise, Sour Cream, Yogurt, Apple Juice, Soy Sauce, Salad Dressing, even most bottled water, some of which is simply being pumped directly out of city water supplies, costs us more than $3.00 a gallon!

Orange juice is now selling for $7.00 a gallon in the store I buy it from.

But Exxon selling gas at $3.00 a gallon is a TREASONOUS CRIME to these people!
Why aren't they boycotting Gulden's Mustard? 
In fact why are these people even buying a product they HATE so much?

THEY should ride bikes and stop flying around in private jets and THEY should STOP telling the rest of us how to live our lives.
 

Sean Hannity asked Robert Kennedy Jr. to take a pledge not to to fly in gas guzzling private jets anymore. Kennedy said that he wouldn't even dignify that question with an answer!  Why won't you take the pledge Mr. Kennedy and fly commercial airliners like the rest of us? CLICK HERE to see the video. Meanwhile Kennedy bashes Sean Hannity and calls him a liar when HE is the hypocrite and liar.

Let's not forget that Robert Kennedy Jr. psychotically blamed Hurricane Katrina on George Bush's failure to sign the Kyoto Treaty.  That treaty was presented to Bill Clinton and AL GORE long before George Bush ever took office.  Why didn't THEY sign and have it ratified it if it was so important?!

The difference in the temperature of the planet had Kyoto been signed would have POSSIBLY have been a fraction of 0.0001% and would have made NO DIFFERENCE WHATSOEVER in the severity of the hurricane.
But it just goes to show what a lying nut job this man is.

What about Arianna Huffington, another strong advocate of Global Warming who tells us all to make small sacrifices in our lives to "Save The Planet"? When asked about Al Gore, RFK Jr., and even HER own private jet use she says they can just buy "carbon offsets" and continue to be environmental sinners. They want us to make "small" sacrifices while they commit HUGE environmental sins. CLICK HERE to see the video clip.

Another environmental HYPOCRITE!

The MONEY is in supporting the Global Warming theory now.  There is now more money is being spent on the promotion of Global Warming than is being spent on Cancer research. 
Scientific grants, giveaways, YOUR tax money, by the billions, is being GIVEN to these people who want to prop up this unproven idea of Global Warming. 
That's because these people jobs, i.e., their very lives, DEPEND upon their Global Warming fear mongering.

After noticing that Exxon made huge profits this year, something that is perfectly legal, Hillary Clinton said: "I want to TAKE those profits and put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence." "TAKE" profits? That's the definition of Socialism! CLICK HERE to see this smug woman say this.

Why should the oil companies have to pay to find new sources of alternative fuels? 
That's not their business, their business is to find and pump oil and gas. That's what they do.
NO ONE has the right to TAKE away their profits.

They operate legitimate businesses and the oil companies already pay MASSIVE taxes.
And if you don't want to buy gasoline, you can choose not to.

If they "TAKE " Exxon's profits the price of gasoline will skyrocket or the oil companies will simply get out of the oil business altogether.  How is that going to solve anything?

Taking from the rich, or the "EVIL RICH" as they categorize them, is simply a part of their Socialist agenda.

By the way what she said is 100% FALSE. The HIGHEST "profits" in the history of the world have been the taxes the US Government has STOLEN from the American people.

You FOOL!  Profits are GOOD!!!  They create jobs, investment, and revenue for the govt.
But that's Capitalism (Freedom) , and we all know Hillary loves SOCIALISM.

The TRUTH is that Bill and Hillary Clinton have Exxon Mobil stock in their own portfolio so they are making money off of them too. And there's nothing wrong with that.

The TRUTH is that the oil companies only make about 15 cents on a gallon of gasoline. The rest goes to expenses and taxes. It's a volume business meaning they have to sell a heck of a lot of gas to make a large profit, and they do.

Of course, we could have energy independence if the Liberals like Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, and RFK Jr. would let us drill for our own oil in ANWR Alaska and build new, safe, clean nuclear power plants that don't pollute.
 

But OH NO they don't want that. They want some imaginary answer for our energy needs to pop out of the sky, or from the oil companies, and ultimately out of YOUR pockets. Click Here to listen to my reworked clip of what Hillary Clinton actually said:)

In December of 2007 Hillary Clinton said "When the world hears of my commitment at my inauguration about ending American dependence on foreign fuel, oil pumping countries will lower prices to stifle America's incentive to develop alternative energy.  I predict to you, the oil producing countries will drop the price of oil."

Not only is that one of the stupidest things that Hillary, or any other Presidential candidate has EVER said, it's completely and utterly absurd.  OPEC is going to lower the price of oil because they fear Hillary's energy policy?!!! 

You can read below how the Democrats 2007 Energy Bill is missing one vital element; it doesn't create ANY new energy sources, it's all about using less energy.

But don't let Hillary fool you. She knows full well OPEC isn't going to lower their prices because of anything she does. They can simply sell more oil to Russia and China who are begging for it.
It's just a combination of Hillary Clinton's pattern of lies, ignorance, pandering, and her true  Socialist agenda.

The ONLY way to lower the price of oil here is for America to drill more of our own abundant supplies of it here in the United States.  SENSIBLE alternative energy sources such as increasing nuclear power, increased natural gas drilling, and clean coal technology are also what we need now, but they are years away from implementation because Congress has BLOCKED all of these existing technologies at this point.  These idiotic roadblocks they have put in the way of creating new energy isn't just going to cost us dearly in terms of dollars, it also greatly weakens our national security.

Yes, one day hydrogen and other energy sources will also be viable alternatives.  But we are still years away from that technology being productive enough to make a dent in our energy needs.
There are scientific roadblocks that still must be overcome.

Throwing government money (YOUR tax money) at these technologies isn't going to make them happen any quicker.  In fact it will be private industry, yes that dirty word to Liberals, CAPITALISM, that will make these new forms of energy work.

Capitalism, despite what Hillary Clinton and John Edwards (HUGE Capitalists themselves) is not an evil thing.  It's Capitalism that has given America it's freedom. We are all free to participate in it and prosper. 

Capitalism is a GOOD thing, but these people simply want to play Robin Hood and rob from the rich and give to the poor.  Maybe that sounds like a good and a fair thing to some people, but in truth that's just SOCIALISM which destroys countries and freedom itself.

I'll be authoring a new page on Economics 101 soon because the rampant ignorance of how Capitalism, and basic economics works is astounding in America. And NOTHING is more costly than ignorance. I'll keep you guys updated:)

Rep. John Dinged, D-Mich, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee has suggested the only real way to reduce greenhouse gases significantly is to raise taxes say with an additional 50 cents a gallon increase in federal gasoline taxes. 

More taxes!  That's the answer!  These politicians aren't happy with the $1.50 they already tax you for each gallon of gasoline. Now they want an additional 50 cents per gallon!

Raising taxes is ALWAYS the Liberal, Democratic response to EVERY problem.  Never mind that this entire Global Warming scenario, and it's solutions, is based on very questionable "science", the way to handle it in the Liberal mind is to raise taxes . . . as usual.

John Dinged basically wants us to drive less and use less gas.  Oil is the ENGINE of the WORLDS economy.  The more energy we use the more that gets done in the world. Everyone makes more money, everyone gets more food. The gasoline engine is critical to raise poorer people out of poverty.

Think about it, who's going to be hurt more by higher gasoline taxes, the rich or the poor?
Of course it will hurt the poor more since they will be spending more on fuel and have less to spend on other necessities.

But then again most things that Liberals do to help the poor usually end up hurting them even more in the long run.

House Energy and Commerce Committee senior Republican, Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma, attacked the tax plan as unworkable.

"Carbon cap-and-trade legislation will impose the largest tax increase ever on the American people without any measurable climate benefits," he said.

Let me repeat that, "without ANY measurable climate benefits".  Finally, a voice of reason.

Senator James Inhofe of recently gave a speech on the hysteria of Global Warming alarmism. HOT & COLD MEDIA SPIN CYCLE: A CHALLENGE TO JOURNALISTS WHO COVER GLOBAL WARMING

Of course, the media then attacked the Senator for having a different opinion calling him "Senator Crank".  Once again we're told to not even question the existence of Global Warming.
They go back to the "scientific consensus" argument which is pure bullcrap because anyone who questions it is simply dismissed as being called a "denier".

They say a body of "scientific experts" have been studying this problem for 4 years. 
Wow, that's certainly long enough to know DEFINITIVELY that Global Warming exists! 

They go on to say that computer models of highly sophisticated computer models, climate scientists can project -- not just predict -- how much temperatures may rise by, say, 2100 if we carry on with business as usual.

They've come to the conclusion that THEY KNOW FOR SURE, and that we should not question them.  The problem is, if you read further down on this web page, the data they are using to create these computer models is coming from various National Weather Service temperature sensors, and that data is sometimes VERY flawed.

The media has branded Senator Inhofe as some sort of environmental Satan for questing the "consensus" behind Global Warming because he questions their template of crisis and fear.

Nothing could be further from the truth as the Senator has recently introduced a bill to protect our nations water supplies which many Democrats have vowed to fight.
 

Inaccuracies in Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth"

The British government has decided to distribute Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" to be viewed in schools there.  But a court there has ordered that if the film is shown that nine inaccuracies in the film be told to schoolchildren before the movie is shown.

In order for the film to be shown, the Government must first amend their Guidance Notes to Teachers to make clear that:

1. The film is a POLITICAL work and promotes only one side of the argument. 

2. If teachers present the film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination. 

3. Eleven inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.

The inaccuracies in Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" are:

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming.  The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct. 

• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years.  The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years. 

• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming.  The Government's expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute one events to global warming. 

• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming.  The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case. 

• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice.  It turned out that Mr. Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm. 

• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility. 

• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will NOT melt for millennia.

• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact INCREASING.

• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching.  The Government could not find ANY evidence to support this claim. 

• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7 meters causing the displacement of millions of people.  In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to only rise by about 40 cm over the next hundred years and that there is NO such threat of massive migration. 

The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand.  The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim. 

The courts ruling requires that students be told by teachers that Al Gore is factually inaccurate, misleading and - in one case - making things up. 

These inconvenient truths for the former Vice President have been covered up or obscured by the hype surrounding his film. 

Students will now realize that there are significant shortcomings and inaccuracies in the way the global warming scare has been presented to them. 

This is a victory for honest debate, a victory for science and a victory for education.  Sorry, Al.
 

The Global Warming crowd tells us that the temperature of the Earth is rising every year because they actually go out and measure it.  How many times have you heard "Last year was the hottest on record"? They claim they have the proof.

Let's look into how they are actually measuring these temperatures. Or to be more specific where they are measuring them.  NOAA - The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration states that temperature monitoring stations must be placed certain distances away from any heat producing devices. Generally that distance is 100 feet. NOAA's temperature sensor guidelines can be found HERE.

But these NOAA regulations are NOT being followed and temperature stations are being placed ridiculously close to high heat producing devices such as air conditioning units, exhaust fans, trash burning drums, barbecue grills, sewage treatment plants, airplane engines, tennis courts, and other hot places that are SPECIFICALLY warned against placing the sensors near.

NOAA's rules specifically state that temperature sensors should not be placed within 100 feet of buildings, concrete, or asphalt parking lots, and certainly not in the vicinity of any heat producing devices such as air conditioners or hot air vents.
 

Even the National Weather Service is not following the rules as to where these temperature monitoring stations are to be placed. If THEY aren't following the rules how would we expect others to as well? Click Here to see a video of meteorologist Anthony Watts explaining the problem with the "official" temperature readings.

Here are where the official temperature reading sensors at the Eureka, CA. National Weather Service Office are placed.

There are literally hundreds of temperature monitoring stations that are in places that give higher temperature readings than the surrounding area would normally have if they were properly placed.

This sensor is 9 feet away from a very hot air conditioner.	This sensor is just a few away from another air conditioner.	This temperature sensor is directly in the path of a super hot jet engine.

The National Weather Service has established standards for equipment, siting, and exposure.
This is the quote from their rule book:

"Temperature sensor siting: The sensor should be mounted 5 feet +/- 1 foot above the ground. 
The ground over which the shelter [radiation] is located should be typical of the surrounding area. A level, open clearing is desirable so the thermometers are freely ventilated by air flow. 

Do not install the sensor on a steep slope or in a sheltered hollow unless it is typical of the area or unless data from that type of site are desired. When possible, the shelter should be no closer than four times the height of any obstruction (tree, fence, building, etc.). 
The sensor should be at least 100 feet from any paved or concrete surface."

Clearly, these rules are not being followed. If that is the case how can these temperature readings be considered accurate?

Napa State Hospital Temperature Monitor

This sensor is less than 10 feet from a hot air conditioner exhaust, a car exhaust and the asphalt pavement!

EVERY ONE of these temperature stations are placed in areas too close to heat producing devices according to the rules set by NOAA.  Yet this is where the "OFFICIAL" data is being collected that they claim "proves" Global Warming is occurring.

Detroit Lakes, Minnesota

This picture is from the "official" climate station in Detroit Lakes MN. This station is located right behind a building. These temperature records are recorded by a man named Don Kitsch who gathers up almost all the temperature readings for the entire state of Minnesota!  This is the data given to both NASA and NOAA from which they issue their official temperature reports.

How can this "official" temperature sensor POSSIBLY get an accurate reading after being placed so close to the outputs of two very large air conditioner exhausts?

The records from this station claimed that 1998-2006 were the hottest years on record. 
Isn't it interesting that this temperature sensor was moved right next to these two air conditioner units on that year?

NASA has just recently corrected itself about when the hottest years on record were.  According to the new corrected data published by NASA, 1998 was no longer the hottest year ever. 1934 was!

Four of the top 10 years of US CONUS high temperature deviations are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well below the leader board, behind even 1900.
In a recent Global Warming scare story by Newsweek they completely ignored this new data!

If the Global warming crowd is basing their arguments on fraction of degree increases, and the data given to them was off, even by one degree, how can their argument possibly stand up?
If they ignore this data, and they do, their "computer models" of  "Global Warming" MUST be wrong!

AL Gore uses a phony computer "model", based upon the OLD temperature readings, and then he has the nerve to exaggerate it's effect by 20 times!  Al Gores "science" is truly laughable.

Al Gore does NOT use this corrected graph of temperature readings in his computer models.

Click Here to see a video clip on why Al Gore's hockey stick chart is WRONG!

One of the most obscenely flagrant violations examples of the temperature monitoring station rules can be seen in Tucson, AZ at the University of Arizona where the sensor is placed directly on a heat reflecting asphalt parking lot.  Yet this is one of the places where they contend the greatest rise in temperature has occurred!  These pictures say it all.

How about the official temperature gauges in Lewis Maine?  They are too close to the pavement, the stone steps, the air conditioning unit, and even a barbecue grill!

Hopkinsville, KY.

Concord, California

How about this sensor in Forest Grove, Oregon? The picture below is from Oregon State Climatologist George Taylor.  You may have heard of him because the Governor of Oregon tried to get him fired for not jumping on to the global warming bandwagon because he didn't see enough supporting evidence.

There's literally hundreds of "official" temperature gathering stations in places where they should not be.  I may even have to start a new web page just to show them all.

I thought this one was particularly humorous.  Besides being too close to a structure (a private home no less!), a vehicle's exhaust, and a heat radiating asphalt street, I wonder how accurate the data is after the sensor has been whacked by an errant basketball a few hundred times?!!!

This folks, is the OFFICIAL SCIENTIFIC DATA that Al Gore uses to predict the worlds catastrophic end!  Be afraid, be VERY afraid of AL GORE!

It's important to note that 80% of the European nations who signed the Kyoto Treaty have FAILED to meet their nations quotas as outlined in the agreement they signed. Hypocrites!
In fact many of the leaders who signed this agreement knew ahead of time that their countries would not meet their specified goals!

Envirowackos are now protesting wind powered energy because birds and bats could possibly be hurt.  Robert Kennedy Jr., one of the countries leading Envirowackos, opposes the windmill farm off of Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Along with the "damage to our environment" he's worried that the companies who set up these farms would make money on them.

No, Mr. Kennedy, companies who will invest countless millions of dollars should not make a penny on their investment!  That's just fine for filthy rich people like YOUR FAMILY who owns a cadre of oil wells!!!
But the rest of us have energy needs, for which you have no realistic solution to, and the rest of us have no problem with companies making profits from their investments. That's called capitalism.

That is why YOU have a multi million dollar trust fund, Mr. Kennedy, because of Capitalism which is not a dirty word.

Meanwhile your brother, Senator Ted Kennedy, is OPPOSED to building windmills that create zero pollution.

Here is a piece by Peter Foster about the recent Bali Conference where Kyoto was discussed.
Here's a section of the article that tells the TRUTH about the Kyoto Treaty.

"Bali will see nothing but posturing and preening, "tough" negotiations, and an agreement to talk further, in yet more exotic locations. 
But we should remember that the object of the exercise is NOT to deal practically with the problems of poverty, or to realistically address the challenges of extreme weather, whether caused by humans or otherwise.

Bjorn Lomborg has eloquently pointed out why Kyoto-style approaches represent a very poor return on investment, and why we would be much better to deal directly with the specific threats of drought, flooding, malaria or hurricane damage, and with the broader issue of how to promote development. 

But that criticism misses the real significance of Kyoto and KyoTwo.
They are not about effectively addressing specific problems, they are about exploiting ignorance about climate science, and continuing to demonize capitalism, in order to make ecocrats feel good, make others feel bad, pad incomes, and expand travel schedules.

Democratic governments have no choice but to cater to the ignorance/alarm/hypocrisy engendered in their electorates.

Bali is NOT about climate; it symbolizes the continued assault on freedom by those who seek -- or pander to -- political power under the guise of concern for humanity."

It's all about making environmentalist politicians feel good about themselves, while bending to the will, and gaining praises from an uneducated public after years of being unknowingly indoctrinated by the leftist media's whose goal is to simply tear down the worlds most successful countries (The United States) and fleece them of whatever money they can.

While hundreds of journalists were allowed to attend and report upon the Kyoto "Conference of the Parties" in December of 2007 it's interesting to note that several organizations such as representatives of Environment & Climate News, who are a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research organization, as well as other journalists who question the existence of Global Warming were REFUSED press credentials to cover the event.

At the Bali conference, the UN’s main climate change official,  Yvo de Boer,  got so upset that he burst into tears while addressing the conference! The World Meteorological Organization claimed that 2007 had been one of the 10 hottest years on record, as were eight other years in the past decade. But that data is apparently flawed and disputed by a number of climate scientists so Mr. Yvo de Boer, decided to pull what every child does when the cant win an argument, he had a tantrum! I guess the TRUTH was a little too much for him to handle! I think he was just crying because he knows how hard it's going to be to steal money from the  United States for his phony cause in the future as his "science" falls apart. But he shouldn't be too upset. They have already stolen millions from the worlds economy to help solve Global Warming. And boy, you can really feel it too with those subzero temperatures in the Midwest!!! I wonder exactly what they will spend this money on to solve the problem?! I figure they'll use it to find MORE ways to tax us!!!

Yvo de Boer The crying environmentalist!

According to the former science editor of the BBC, David Whitehouse in the reputable British journal New Statesman that global warming has stopped, should be taken very seriously by the world's climate science community.  An article in that journal saying that the global temperature of 2007 is statistically the same as 2006 as well as every year since 2001 is the basis for his claim that global warming has stopped has created quite a serious problem for those who believe than manmade greenhouse gases cause global warming. 

This is not what the climate models predicted. However it is in line with recent research and radiosonde data that fails to show the heating of the upper atmosphere that identifies warming by greenhouse gases. So we need to know why the models failed to predict that warming would stop and why they predict an upper atmosphere warming that is not happening.

Any doubts about the fact that the whole climate change issue is being mishandled by governments have been reinforced by Professor David Henderson, former head of the Economic Unit of OECD, now a visiting professor at Westminster University, whose recent illuminating address to the American Institute for Economic Research, which can be found on the web site": http://www.climatescience.org.nz

The Faked Polar Bear Photo Remember that wonderful picture of the stranded polar bears on an ice flow that were used by folks like Al Gore to demonstrate how dire the man-made global warming issue is? It turns out the picture was taken in August, “when every year the fringes of the Arctic ice cap melt regardless of the wider effects of global warming.” Read the full story HERE about this FAKE!

The Polar Bear Picture They Won't Show You

People forget that back in the early 1970', before they ever dreamed up this global warming scam, many scientists were saying that they were SURE that the Earth was cooling and that we were headed into another Ice Age!  When I was in high school they taught us that another Ice Age was about to begin. This was reported by Newsweek.

Washington D.C. resident John Lockwood was conducting research at the Library of Congress and came across an intriguing Page 2 headline in the Nov. 2, 1922 edition of The Washington Post: "Arctic Ocean Getting Warm; Seals Vanish and Icebergs Melt."

The 1922 article, obtained by Inside the Beltway, goes on to mention "great masses of ice have now been replaced by moraines of earth and stones," and "at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared."

Fire and Ice Journalists have warned of climate change for 100 years, but can't decide weather we face an ice age or warming.

It's all about the media hysteria that seems to run in a 30 year cycle. 
First we're headed towards another Ice age, then it's back to the planet heating up.
Over and over again the media thrives on a crisis. The latest Global Warming hysteria is just another example of this.

This isn't a question of science. It's a question of whether Americans can trust what the media tell them about science. Just look at the different positions the New York Times have taken over the years.  Why is it that they can't seem to make up their minds?  Critics will say "But we 're so much smarter today, now we have more evidence".  But with the temperature readings so obviously corrupted how is the science better today?

We are in an increased period of high activity on the Sun right now where it is hotter than ever. This activity would far surpass whatever man could do on this planet. But liberals don't want you to know about this, they simply want to BLAME AMERICA! Global Warming from Increased Sunspots

But the main source of greenhouse gasses, what the Envirowackos claim is causing global warming, is NOT the use of fossil fuels, it is because of WATER VAPOR!

Cambridge, MA - A review of more than 200 climate studies led by researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics has determined that the 20th century is neither the warmest century nor the century with the most extreme weather of the past 1000 years.

The review also confirmed that the Medieval Warm Period of 800 to 1300 A.D. and the Little Ice Age of 1300 to 1900 A.D. were worldwide phenomena not limited to the European and North American continents. 

"While 20th century temperatures are much higher than in the Little Ice Age period, many parts of the world show the medieval warmth to be greater than that of the 20th century."

Scientific Fact

Al Gore's Hockey Stick Fiction

Click Here to see a video clip on why Al Gore's hockey stick chart is WRONG!

Al Gore's "hockey stick graph",  may be the most contested example of  information visualization in the history of science. The hockey stick graph is NOT debunkable, but Leprechauns are also not debunkable!

Click Here to see a video of two prominent climate scientists discus why Al Gore's hockey stick graph based on carbon dioxide levels is completely wrong. This video takes about a minute to load so please give it a little time to do so.

The DNA is proof that sometime between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, much of Greenland was especially green and covered in a boreal forest that was home to alder, spruce and pine trees, as well as insects such as butterflies and beetles. 

From the genetic material of these organisms, the researchers infer that Greenland's temperature once varied from 50 degrees Fahrenheit in summer to 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit in winter the temperature range that the tree species prefer. 

“We have shown for the first time that southern Greenland … was once very different to the Greenland we see today,” said study leader Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen."

But wait a minute! Al Gore has stated that the Earth has not been this warm in close to a million years. This directly contradicts what Gore and the other Global Warming "experts" have said.

Yet we now have actual PROOF (not just the bogus computer "models" Gore uses) from these ice core samples, that Greenland was much warmer than it is today. 
In An Inconvenient Truth Al Gore uses ice core samples to make his point. So why are these ice core samples, which contradict Gore's conclusions, ignored?

This is the actual scientific PROOF that Al Gore and RFK Jr. are unwilling to debate.  Why is that?

Even the liberal New York Times reported on March 13, 2007 in an article on concerns among some scientists about the tone and the accuracy of the film, noting that they "argue that some of Mr. Gore's central points are exaggerated and erroneous".  They comment on his claim that the seas will rise over 20 feet as "beyond ridiculous and simply an outright lie as far as all scientific evidence shows us today".

The documentary film The Great Global Warming Swindle, broadcast on Channel 4 in the UK on March 8, 2007, brought together skeptical scientists who disagree with the prevailing consensus regarding human caused global warming.

The film claims that in Al Gore's movie, An Inconvenient Truth, Gore has misrepresented the data, and that the actual relationship between carbon dioxide and the temperature is completely the other way round, that is, the rise in temperature itself causes an increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

They off proof and charts to this assertion just like Gore does.

Yet Gore still insists that it is CO2 that makes the Earth's temperature to rise, and of course, once again he REFUSES to even debate it.

When Albert Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity he spent his ENTIRE LIFE trying to disprove the theory just to make sure it was correct.

That's the way REAL scientists work.

They come up with a theory and then debate it to try to disprove it to make sure that it is real.

They don't do what Al Gore does which is to tell us "The debate is OVER, it is time to act".

How does Gore want to act?  He wants to tax Americans for their use of fossil fuels.

This "carbon tax" would, of course, raise the price of gasoline and the cost of home heating and cooling.

In April, CNBC Squawk Box anchor Joe Kernen famously interviewed Gore sycophants Laurie David and singer Sheryl Crow about global warming.  In addition to refusing to respond to Kernen’s repeated questions about the underlying science of global warming, Laurie David contemptuously reiterated Al Gore's mantra, “The debate is over.”

• One, observe a phenomenon. 

• Two, devise a hypothesis to explain the phenomenon. 

• Three, devise a test to prove or disprove the hypothesis.

Every global warming theory I have read stops at step 2.

Most pro Global Warming people think the hypothesis must be true, so it is true, end of story.

That makes Global Warming a RELIGION and NOT a scientific fact which can be proven.

If an 8th grader gave this global warming "evidence" to his science teacher in the 60's he would have been given a failing grade and a lesson to how to accurately perform a controlled experiment.

Global Warming is supported by such a selective, narrow set of "facts" that it is laughable.

It ignores entire sets of other real facts that can prove that the earth isn't warming at all.

And even is Global Warming is truly happening why isn't being blamed on the fact that all tests prove that the Sun is getting hotter, and that there is "global warming" on Mars and Venus most likely caused by the Sun?

Because the religion of global warming wants to blame man and the environmental sinner who must be punished then saved.

Al Gore, the Greenie Weenies, and the media want you to believe that Ethanol, made form corn or sugar is the best solution to our pollution and energy problems.

There are so many problems with Ethanol it's not funny.  While it can be used as a fuel, it turns out there is NO cost savings, energy savings, or environmental savings from it. Producing Ethanol uses MORE energy than it creates! It also creates MORE air pollution and environmental damage than oil does.  It is also INCREASING starvation all over the world. That is IMMORAL! CLICK HERE to see the Ethanol Myths video clip. Ethanol: The Political Fuel

Ethanol production is driving worldwide food prices sky high.  Corn is used in thousands of food products and that will make the costs of almost every food go up. It is estimated that 90% of Americans use a corn based product everyday. Corn is also used as grain to feed chickens and cattle. Think about it, not only will it cost us Americans more for food, but it's going to cost the poorest people of the world more for food.  That's nothing but cruel and IMMORAL! Growing corn and sugar for Ethanol has become a big business. The problem it is costing us all a lot more money, and starving people all over the world. Is it really worth the cost? Ethanol and the Calculation Issue

Ethanol is now causing MORE starvation around the world with the poorest among us being the hardest hit. Average Mexicans will end up spending up to a third of their total income on tortillas a main staple of food in Mexico. CLICK HERE to read more about this.

In Mexico the rising cost corn has driven up the cost of of tortillas that has caused protests from thousands of people. CLICK HERE to read the story.

The corn or sugar used to make Ethanol also takes a lot of fertilizer, and clean water to make it grow. As environmentalists will tell you (true or not) the Earth is running dangerously low of fresh water. 

In fact they say that it is Global Warming itself that is depleting the worlds fresh water supplies.
But one of the solutions they propose is using Ethanol which needs massive amounts of water to produce.  Their solutions are actually contradicting themselves! 

It takes 450 pounds of corn to produce the ethanol to fill only ONE SUV tank. 
That's enough corn to feed one person for a YEAR! It's no wonder why food prices are rising.
Plus, it takes more than one gallon of fossil fuel -- oil and natural gas -- to produce one gallon of ethanol. It also takes 1,800 gallons of water to produce ONE gallon of ethanol!

Growing corn for fuel is using a lot more water, driving water prices up, and causing more water shortages around the world. In the August 2007 issue of the journal Human Ecology, it suggested that more WARS may occur over the shortages of water, and the shortages and high prices of food in the world.
They say that historically this has been the case in the past.

Fertilizer costs are also rising making EVERY crop more expensive to grow. That leads to even higher food prices.  And the herbicides and pesticides necessary to grow corn at an industrial scale leach toxins into the groundwater.  Once again, it's the poorest of the poor who are being affected by this the most.

Outside the U.S., rapidly growing demand for ethanol could worsen hunger in developing countries.
Using more corn crops for fuel puts more pressure on supply and demand, raising the cost of food.

Despite the huge, taxpayer supported agricultural subsidies, the prices of corn — and tortillas — have been climbing rapidly causing shortages in the poorest parts of Mexico.

Greg Page, president and chief operating officer of Cargill Inc., a leading ethanol producer said;
"We as leaders should be asking, "What prices are we prepared to make the world's poor pay for food?".

The Envirowackos don't REALLY care about the worlds poor people starving to death.  All they care about is making a political statement about the imaginary effects of "Global Warming" to make themselves feel like they are doing something to help the Earth, when the TRUTH is that they will be making problems worse.

I was in the supermarket recently and there was a flyer placed over the milk aisle explaining why milk prices were rising.  The U.S, current prices are higher than ever at $3.80 a gallon.

I recently paid $7.00 for a gallon of orange juice. That's more than DOUBLE than the price of gasoline!
Because of the cold temperatures (what happened to the warming?) much of this years orange crop has been lost.  Why isn't Hillary Clinton investigating the orange growers "excessive profits"?
 
 

Corn feed costs are rising because of the mandate for Ethanol and that's driving Milk, Cheese, Butter, Ice Cream and many other types of food prices sky high. Expect Milk Prices To Rise Click Here to see the video

Click Here to see how Ethanol is causing milk prices to rise.

In my state we are FORCED to have 10% Ethanol in our gasoline. Ever since this FORCED change I've been using high test premium gasoline instead of regular to get the same performance from my engine in my nice new car.

I DO notice the difference.  Meanwhile, our taxes are being used to subsidize this losing proposition.

I want back my FREE CHOICE of whether to use regular gasoline or an Ethanol blend that I know is more corrosive to my engine.  Which, of course, will cause me to buy a new car sooner, which is going to cause more damage to the environment.  Can you hear me banging my head against the wall?  No?  It must be because of the loud knocking of my engine from putting that crap into it!

Congress has now MANDATED (meaning they have taken away your FREEDOM of choice) the use of Ethanol in it's 2007 Energy Bill, which, of course, doesn't create ANY new energy at all, it only says that we should use less. A great solution for a growing country.

To create Ethanol they must also use Natural Gas in it's production thereby wasting even MORE energy. Scientists are now estimating that it takes 30% MORE energy to create the Ethanol than the energy the Ethanol creates!

Did you Global Warming fools get that?  100% of the energy created by Ethanol costs 130% in other forms of energy to create the Ethanol, which is MORE polluting that other types of energy.

This is only slightly less stupid than buying oil from terrorists rather than drilling our own oil here in the United States!

This article, says there is a "slight swelling and blistering on the carburetor and an increase in carbon deposits on pistons."  Wait a minute here!  MORE Carbon?!!!
I thought Ethanol was supposed to have LESS Carbon?  If it's on the pistons it MUST be going through the exhaust also!

The article goes on to say that 20% blend of Ethanol in gasoline causes "substantial problems" in engines.  Some people say that we can simply use newer engines that can handle the Ethanol.  Then what happens with all the old engines?  What about vintage cars? What about lower income people who can't afford new engines? Will they be stuck with problem engines? 

Ethanol is costing about $1.75 cents a gallon.  Not bad you say?
Let's think about the REALITY of the situation. Ethanol is being subsidized by MILLIONS of your YOUR tax dollars, because they can't actually make any money with it, so the cost is much more than you realize.
We are all paying to LOOSE money with this bad idea.

Gasoline is being taxed at a rate of 75 cents to $1.50 per gallon or more in the United States. Add that tax onto the actual prices of Ethanol and it will actually cost MORE than gasoline!  Don't think that LIBERAL politicians taxing will stop taxing ANY form of energy in this country.  Some states now even tax windmills and solar panels!

Ethanol cannot be sent through pipelines like oil can. This is a complicated issue that can be read about HERE. This is a HUGE problem to overcome.

Since it can't be sent by pipelines that means that Ethanol must be trucked to reach filling stations.  That means MUCH MORE fuel use just to get the fuel, which uses more fuel, in fact at least 35% MORE fuel, to create Ethanolas the energy it produces for us. This is resulting in a net LOSS of energy because of the use of Ethanol.

So, in reality, Ethanol is polluting, and costing MORE than oil.  Meanwhile, Congress is MANDATING that we subsidize it with our tax dollars.

This is only slightly less stupid than doing what we do now which is to buy oil from terrorist supporting nations, WHEN WE HAVE OUR OWN OIL THAT WE COULD DRILL RIGHT HERE IN THE UNITED STATES!

The idiocy of all this is mind boggling.

While we have billions of gallons of untapped oil, and untold megawatts of electricity available to us from Nuclear power, the sustainability of using biofuels such as Ethanol. 

The question of sustainability arises when we consider that ethanol from corn can't possibly be grown forever because growing corn depletes the soil even if sustainable farming methods such as crop rotation are used. Some researchers argue that ethanol production from corn could wear out the soil within 30 years.  Then we will be without energy AND without food!

A recent story by the AP stated that Ethanol is great solution because it is cheaper than gasoline.
A bit further down in the story they revealed the truth of that statement by adding that it was government subsidies (your tax dollars) that made it that way.

Ethanol has been shown to damage engines partially because it is water soluble, and has the ability to pick up water, and that corrodes engines and pipelines.

Another new problem is that the Environmental Protection Agency is now saying the burning of Ethanol is causing MORE pollution, and that it causes Carbon Monoxide and carcinogens "many times greater" than they promised.  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are being released by the ethanol plants include formaldehyde and acetic acid, both carcinogens. 

The fumes are produced when fermented corn mash is dried for sale as a supplement for livestock feed. Devices known as thermal oxidizers can be attached to the plants to burn off the dangerous gases.  Yet Congress is forcing states to produce more Ethanol!

Remember when Sting and all the other environmentalists warned us about cutting down the rain forests?  They told us without the rain forests in South America the planet would die very soon. So what's happening in South American countries like Brazil today?  Farmers are cutting down the forests in order to grow corn and sugar for Ethanol! Farmland in Brazil is being burned, in preparation for planting corn and beans. A new study finds that ethanol production drives such land clearing,  is contributing greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.  So the forests are disappearing at a FASTER rate than they were before. Local water supplies are being used up and food prices are climbing.

Noted ecologist and primate scientist Jane Goodall says biofuel crops are hurting the rain forests. She says the race to grow crops for vehicle fuels is damaging rain forests in Asia, Africa, and South America, and adding to the emissions blamed for global warming.

Critics say that the demand for the fuels has led companies to cut down and burn forests in order to grow the crops, adding to heat trapping emissions and leading to erosion and stress on ecosystems. "Biofuel isn't the answer to everything" says Goodall.

After the corn and sugar is picked the South American farmers then burn the dried out crops so that it will make cheaper fertilizer for growing the new crop and cause them less work in removing the old growth. Sometimes they burn the fields before they pick the sugar. It doesn't hurt the cane and it increases the concentration of the sugar.

This creates MASSIVE amounts of air pollution.  This pollution situation is so bad that the pollution is now causing respiratory illnesses in OTHER COUNTRIES than the ones growing the crops for Ethanol!   Doesn't all this just make you want to bang your head against the wall?!!!

Even the EXTREME FAR LEFT New York Times columnist, the ferret-like  Paul Krugman, a TRULY anti-American weasel, agrees that Ethanol and Biofuels are a losing proposition, then you know it must be true! It takes a LOT for a LIberal to admit when they are wrong! Grains Gone Wild - The Biofuel SCAM!

• Ethanol uses as much energy to produce it as the energy it makes. There is NO savings in money or in environmental damage in using Ethanol.

• Ethanol costs you MORE money because the government has to subsidize it with YOUR tax dollars.

• Ethanol causes worldwide food prices to rise, sometimes dramatically, affecting the poorest people we have and possibly even starving them to death.

• Ethanol uses massive amounts of fresh water to produce and will cause many more shortages of fresh water all over the world.

• Ethanol costs more to ship because it cannot be sent through normal pipelines.

• Ethanol use is creating even more deadly toxins and carcinogens such as Carbon Monoxide and formaldehyde.

• Ethanol production is causing the destruction of the rain forests to grow corn and sugar cane.

• Ethanol is causing high amounts of respiratory illnesses by increasing air pollution by the burning of used corn and sugar fields.

• Ethanol can cause damage in normal engines and it's being FORCED upon us and we have NO CHOICE if we want it in our gasoline or not as Congress has mandated it's use.

Those compact florescent light bulbs that all the ENVIROWACKOS claim will "Save The Planet" (Give me a BREAK!) contain deadly MERCURY. These bulbs, when broken, as thrown into a landfill or incinerated, will spread deadly MERCURY all over our planet. Environmental cleanup teams have been called in to clean up such messes and new regulations are now being made for the disposal of these bulbs.  The United States Congress has BANNED the incandescent light bulb and is FORCING us all to use these dangerous lightbulbs. Just another example of Congress taking away MORE of our FREEDOM.

Take a look at this video which explains how these bulbs are toxic and how they must be disposed of so that the Mercury doesn't leech into our groundwater and food.  Then they tell us it will be OK if we recycle them. But they fail to mention take recycling requires lots of energy use which negates the entire concept of energy conservation! They also don't mention where they put all the toxic Mercury. Click Here to see the video.

From a recent news story:  "Maybe it is the mercury inside those fluorescent bulbs that give some of us pause. If you were to break one, you've just created some hazardous waste right in the comfort of your own home. 

A broken fluorescent bulb will immediately release dangerous mercury into the air. And the initial discomfort of exposure to that mercury - dizziness and nausea - are the least of your concerns. 

Breathing in that stuff can cause lifelong damage to the central nervous system and should be avoided.  If you are convinced that fluorescent is the way to go, there are some ways to minimize your risk of exposure to mercury from a broken bulb. 

Toxicology experts say the first thing you should do if you break one is to leave the room IMMEDIATELY!
Take the kids and the pets with you and don't come back for at least fifteen minutes. 
After the air has cleared, you can begin cleaning up the mess, but don't break out the vacuum cleaner. 
Instead, wear rubber gloves and sweep it into a plastic bag. Seal the bag and dispose of it as you would any other hazardous waste. Then take the broken bulb to a HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY.

If one of these bulbs burns out you still cannot throw it into the regular trash because at some point it will be broken in the movement and disposal of that trash. In ANY condition the compact florescent light bulb is considered HAZARDOUS WASTE!

Purdue University scientist John Fenemore states that in "in 20 years it may turn out that switching to fluorescent light bulbs could greatly increase the amount of mercury in our living environment.  The amount of mercury in our food may increase 500% or more.  Fish may become unsafe to eat at all.  These florescent light bulbs may turn out to be one of the greatest man made human catastrophes we've every created on this planet WITH NO WAY TO CLEAN IT UP!"
 

From a recent article:

"Last month, Brandy Bridges, a Prospect, Maine, resident went out and bought two dozen CFL's and began installing them in her home. One broke. A month later, her daughter's bedroom remains sealed off with plastic like the site of a hazardous materials accident, while Bridges works on a way to pay off a $2,000 estimate by a company specializing in environmentally sound cleanups of the mercury inside the bulb"

Here are a couple of points to think about before you decide that buying these bulbs will
"save the planet."

They claim these bulbs save energy.  Why is that?  Because they produce more light and don't "waste" all that electricity creating heat instead of light.

It's dissipating into your room, warming it up, and therefore you'll need less of your regular HVAC heat to heat your home!  Just ask any 10 year old with an EZ bake oven! That point NEVER makes it into to these pinheads brains!  The LIBERAL MEDIA will also NEVER mention that fact either! In another step to take away our personnel FREEDOM, Congress has now voted to BAN the 100 watt incandescent light bulb. They are actually making it a CRIME to sell one!  Unbelievable! Bye Bye, Light Bulb

China is now the worlds largest greenhouse gas emitter.  It's increasing by a dramatic rate there.

My nephew lives in Shanghai and he tells me the air pollution in China is simply unbelievable.

Recently it has been reported that soon 3/4 of the air pollution on our West Coast will come from China.  Yet China has NO interest in signing Kyoto.  But Al Gore blames America FIRST.
Why doesn't he send his silly little COMMIE light bulbs over there?!!!

Hey Al, your Global Warming hasn't hit here yet. It's freezing outside!  I think I'm going to heat my entire house with old fashioned, Thomas Edison incandescent light bulbs!

New warnings for compact florescent light bulbs! The energy saving light bulbs that will be made compulsory in homes in a few years can trigger migraine headaches!

The Migraine Action Association (MAA) said some of its members alleged the fluorescent bulbs had led to attacks of the powerful headaches.

The MAA is calling on the Government to avoid a complete ban on old style bulbs, by providing an opt out for people with health problems. 

Last year it was claimed that the "green" bulbs can cause people with epilepsy to experience symptoms similar to the early stages of a fit. The bulbs may also affect people with Lupus, an auto immune disease, making their symptoms worse.

People I can tell you from first hand experience that I am light sensitive and when I am around florescent light I get headaches.  I can't stand florescent light!

Al Gore uses hundreds of times more fuel than the average American to heat his home and to fly private jets all over the world.  He uses private jets to get to speaking engagements where they pay him hundreds of thousands of dollars for his "knowledge".  He justifies this hypocrisy by by buying "Carbon Offsets" that "neutralize" his "Carbon Footprint". That's like saying it's OK that I, Al Gore can pollute, but I can pay money and be forgiven for for my massive "Carbon Footprint".

Carbon Offsets are the biggest scam going.  People are paying companies to plant trees for them to neutralize whatever Co2 gasses they create that they claim is causing Global Warming.

There's two things wrong with this. First of all it has not been proven that Co2 causes Global Warming.  In fact the REAL evidence shows that it is the Earth's NATURAL warming that CAUSES a rise in Co2.  That's completely opposite of what Al Gore says, and there is a lot of evidence to support this claim as explained in the video;

Secondly,  scientists are exploring the use of tree planting as a carbon offsets strategy. 
What they have discovered is that The First Rule of Carbon Offsets = No Trees.

Does planting trees reduce global warming? NO!
The Carnegie Institution's Ken Caldeira summarized the result of a major 2005 study  this way: “To plant forests to mitigate climate change outside of the tropics is a waste of time.”

Why?  Because forest canopies are relatively dark, compared to what they replace outside the tropics — grass, croplands, or snow fields — and so they absorb more of the sun's heating rays that fall on them. That negates the “carbon sink” benefit trees have soaking up carbon dioxide. Worse, the study found that planting a large number of trees in high latitudes would “probably have a net warming effect on the Earth's climate.” Ouch!

Al Gore has described the lifestyle he and his wife Tipper Gore live as "carbon neutral," meaning he tries to offset any energy usage, including plane flights and car trips, by "purchasing verifiable reductions in CO2 elsewhere." Here is a picture of the Gore's mansion that uses 20 times the energy than the average American house.

The TRUTH is that it turns out Gore pays for his extra large carbon footprint through Generation Investment Management, a London based company with offices in Washington, D.C., for which he serves as chairman and partially owns. The company was established to take financial advantage of new technologies and solutions related to combating "Global Warming."

So the moral of the story is that if you're rich you can simply buy these useless "Carbon Offsets" and be forgiven what you claim is environmental damage!
 
 

Here is Al Gore getting off a private luxury Gulfstream Jet off and getting into his gas guzzling limousine. The" carbon footprint" of this jet is that in one ONE hour of flying time it creates more CO2 than an average SUV uses in a YEAR! Al Gore just another Limousine Liberal! Watch the video HERE.

Peter Schweizer writes: Al Gore has held these apocalyptic views about the environment for some time. So why, then, didn't Gore dump his family's large stock holdings in Occidental (Oxy) Petroleum? As executor of his family's trust, over the years Al Gore has controlled hundreds of thousands of dollars in Oxy stock. Oxy has been mired in controversy over oil drilling in ecologically sensitive areas. 

Living carbon neutral apparently doesn't mean living oil stock free. Nor does it necessarily mean giving up a mining royalty either.

Humanity might be "sitting on a ticking time bomb," but Gore's home in Carthage is sitting on a zinc mine. Up until 2003 Gore received $20,000 a year in royalties from Pasminco Zinc, which operates a zinc concession on his property. Tennessee has cited the company for adding large quantities of barium, iron and zinc to the nearby Caney Fork River. 

The issue here is not simply Gore's hypocrisy; it's a question of credibility. If he genuinely believes the apocalyptic vision he has put forth and calls for radical changes in the way other people live, why hasn't he made any radical change in his life? Giving up the zinc mine or one of his homes is not asking much, given that he wants the rest of us to radically change our lives.

The reason Al Gore and his friends claim that "the debate is over" is NOT because they are basing their beliefs on science. It is because Environmentalism is the new RELIGION! Actually, it's just Paganism, or the worship of the Earth.

Paganism

The Envirowackos don't REALLY care about the environment, or poor people starving to death. 

All they care about is making a political statement about the imaginary effects of "Global Warming" to make themselves feel like they are doing something to help the Earth, when the TRUTH is that they are making problems worse.  It's all about soothing their own guilty egos, and controlling the way the rest of us live.

The most important element of Global Warming isthat it has is faith, because the people who believe in it can't prove it.  So, it is nothing more than a religion for people who have not a whole lot of foundation in their lives. They want their lives to have meaning, so they're running around and doing these inconsequential things. They're "mattering," which everybody wants to do. 

The whole global warming movement has been based on nothing more than a scare oriented political agenda that was hatched by a bunch of big government liberals. 

That's all it's ever been, and the evidence, if any of you doubted it, could be found in the Kyoto protocol which is designed to fleece the United States and other wealthy nations around the world to pay for all the damage that we've caused, and to enact policies that would weaken our economy because it's not right to them that we're a wealthy country.

In the seventies the same people were talking about global cooling, and eventually there will be be another ice age and the environmentalists will say, "Yeah, it was brought on by global warming." Whatever happens, they'll blame it on Global Warming!

If the world warms it's Global Warming, If it cools, it will be because of Global Warming.

These people have set us a system, that we cannot question, that no matter what happens, they will always be right.

Al Gore actually said that "the internal combustion engine poses the greatest threat to humanity today."

The sad fact is that in his mind he's not kidding. Who could argue with such a learned man, after all, according to him, he did invent the Internet! 
 

Environmentalism is the new religion of choice for urban atheists.  Did I say it's a religion?  Well, just look at the beliefs. If you look carefully, you see that environmentalism is in fact a perfect 21st century remaking of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs. Just like Christianity there's an initial Eden, a paradise, a state of grace and unity with nature, there's a fall from grace into a state of pollution as a result of eating from the tree of knowledge, and as a result of our actions there is a Judgment Day coming for us all.  We are all energy sinners, doomed to die, unless we seek salvation, which is now called sustainability, or "going green". Sustainability is salvation in the church of the environment. Just as organic food is its communion, that pesticide free wafer that the right people with the right beliefs, imbibe.

Eden, the fall of man, the loss of grace, the coming doomsday -- these are deeply held mythic structures. 

I certainly don't want to talk anybody out of them, just as I don't want to talk anybody out of a belief that Jesus Christ is the son of God who rose from the dead. 

But the reason I don't want to talk anybody out of these beliefs is that I know that I can't talk anybody out of them. That's because these are NOT facts that can be argued. 
These are issues of FAITH. And you can't argue faith, by definition. 

And so it is, sadly, with environmentalism. Increasingly it seems facts aren't necessary, because the tenets of environmentalism are all about BELIEF.
 

According to Environmentalists it's about whether you are going to be a sinner, or be saved. Whether you are going to be one of the people on the side of salvation, or on the side of doom.  Whether you are going to be one of the enlightened ones who care, or one of those who want to destroy the Earth out of selfishness.

Am I exaggerating to make a point?  I'm afraid not.

We know a lot more about the world than we did forty or fifty years ago. And what we know now is not so supportive of certain core environmental myths, yet these myths do not die. 

Let's examine some of those beliefs. There is no Eden. There never was. When was that the Eden of the wonderful mythic past? 

Was it the time when infant mortality was 80%, when four children in five died of disease before the age of five? When one woman in six died in childbirth?
When the average life span was 40, as it was in America a century ago?
When plagues swept across the planet, killing millions at a time. Was it when millions starved to death?  Is that when it was Eden?  It is to the environmentalists because they say at least we didn't have the internal combustion engine, and incandescent light bulbs back then.

Environmentalism is a religion that says their God is a tree or their God is some element of nature, and they don't need facts. They certainly don't want us "non believers" to question their facts which are actually only beliefs and NOT facts.

Then they try to make everybody feel guilty and they try to convince everybody that we, by simply living our lives, are destroying this planet. 

And it all harbors on this belief that this used to be pristine on the earth. Those Redwood Forest or those jungles, the rain forests, all, used to be pristine. 

It was just fine and dandy until we got here, and then WE started ruining things, and it's all centered around global warming and how we, energy sinners, environmental sinners, are destroying the planet. 

Today's environmentalism is TOTALLY a religious belief, and many of the people who adopt all this in fact claim to be secularists, who claim to have nothing to do with religion because they think religion is for kooks, that they are "men and women of science," that they are men and women a cut above all of us.

We are mere plebes incapable of understanding the deep, dark secrets that their brilliance alone is able to discern, and as such, we are but mere foot soldiers. Our minds are porous, but they can be shaped, and they continue to try to shape us each and every day with greater and greater fear and scare tactics, all the while telling us it's our fault.

They say "I'm not going to be a religious nut right winger!  I'm smarter than that!"

Yet they are not secularists at all. They in fact are DEEPLY religious. They just have a different religion.  In fact if anything they are simply Pagans worshiping Mother Earth.

It is crucial to understand that all of this is made easy for these environmental religionists because they know that everybody's historical perspective begins with the day they were born. 

People thought they were in the last days 80 years ago. "Oh, it's never been worse" they said!
Look at all these diseases and pestilence. "We can't stop it!"
We think we're in the worst times we've ever had.  We think we're in the last days. 
Every generation does. 

So you've got people who have come along and tried to capitalize on this. They can't offer you facts. They don't have any REAL facts. All they can offer is EMOTION. 

Environmentalists hector us about the impending end of the world. Perhaps it is not the end of the world that they fear, it's just the end of THEM. 

Analysis of global temperatures is a subtle issue about which reasonable men reach different conclusions. 

The truth is that there is NO 100% conclusive DEFINITIVE EVIDENCE of global warming, or of man's absolute responsibility of it. That is simply a theory these people want us to accept as fact, and they refuse to even debate it.  But the facts are NOT what is at issue here for these people.

The evangelical zealotry that motivates the greenie weenie global-warmers has a different source than the facts and that is that human beings cannot bear their own transient existence without some hope of immortality.

This is the key, because this is the point here.  Immortality. Everybody thinks about it. 
Everybody thinks about the afterlife.  Everybody thinks there's got to be more than this, and everybody tries to do whatever they think necessary to discover what it is, and how to get there.

And the religion of environmentalism is what people hold dear today and the practice of it is the tool for that. 

The environment has become a religion for people. To many people, a tree or a plant or an animal is their religion, and it is there that they find their immortality and it is there that they find destruction which could cause their own mortality.

With the decline of Christianity the get high culture of the West: sex, drugs, and violence predominate. These devices eventually leave the user all the more anxious. 

By living on the underside of popular culture, the young people of the West make themselves feel worthless and insignificant.

In the cartoon Antz, an insect (with Woody Allen's voice) complains to an ant psychiatrist: "I feel so insignificant", to which the ant psychiatrist replies: "That's a breakthrough. You ARE insignificant!" 

That's a creepy thought; if human beings truly felt themselves to be insignificant, the suicide rate would be much higher. In fact, cultures who truly come to feel insignificant, eg, Stone Age peoples who come into unwanted contact with the modern world, sometimes register suicide rates of 25 percent to 50 percent.  We do not typically observe very high rates of suicide because the human mind resists its own destruction by wishing away its sense of insignificance. Paranoia is one such device.

In the United States, many people believed that evil white doctors invented AIDS to wipe out the poor population. 

Adolph Hitler believed that syphilis was a Jewish plot to poison Aryan blood. 

Today's educated Westerners do not normally believe in such bizarre ideas, but they are susceptible to subtler forms of the same thing. The sense of the transcendent they derive from contemplating nature is of desperate importance. 'It is not that I will pass from the earth without leaving so much as a grease spot to mark my stay". 'It is the earth herself who is in danger. The rain forests will vanish! The whales will become extinct! The ice caps are melting!'

Anxiety about the irreversible disappearance of some feature of the natural world substitutes for the death anxiety of the individual. The environmentalist now becomes the enemy of industrial civilization in general. 

Of course I do not oppose SENSIBLE measures to protect clean air and water, to protect the rain forests, to prevent over fishing and so forth, but I am weary of the fanaticism that distinguishes the conservationist from the environmental fanatic who has turned against civilization.
 

Just look at the new scare tactic book, "The Earth Without Humans" where the author imagines a world without humans because "Global Warming" has destroyed  the Earth. The most of the media won't print the TRUE facts that the temperature readings are wrong, or that the "hottest years on record" as reported by NASA have now been updated which makes all of their computer "models" that Al Gore uses useless. NASA Corrects 120 Years Worth of Bad Data. They won't print that the glaciers are actually growing larger in Antarctica, or that the Sun is actually getting hotter. Guess what? Antarctica's getting colder, not warmer! Seasons of the Sun No, they want to use fear tactics and blame man because it makes a better story line, a better "template" that's more dramatic.  It's much better to report "THE SKY IS FALLING!" Fear sells, normal weather patterns do not. It doesn't matter if New York City is scorching hot or freezing cold.  Man did it because he is an environmental sinner. Some even suggest that the planet would be better if we were gone.  Women are now aborting babies to "save the planet"! Click Here to see the video for  "The Earth Without Humans" Here's another: Your House Without You

It is worth observing that the U.S. returns more farmland to the wilderness every year, because rising agricultural productivity concentrates more output on a smaller number of square miles.
But Al Gore, the media, or the environmentalists won't tell you that.

Environmentalism has become the new religion. Everybody needs to believe in their own immortality. 

This is why recycling has become so prevalent. It's costs far more in money, and yes, it costs the environment MORE in overall pollution to recycle, but we do it because we are told it will "save the Earth".  It's simply not true, and it's doing EXACTLY the opposite of what they claim it is.

The same holds true with Global Warming. There is just as much evidence against global warming as there is for it.  But the liberal media generally doesn't print that because it does not fit into their template of blaming man, especially the "evil rich white man" living in the United States who is to be blamed for destroying the earth for his own greed.

The Weather Channel reporter Dr. Heidi Cullen recently said "the Earth has not been this hot in the last million years." 

How does that jive with the newly discovered evidence that the Greenland ice core samples PROVE that Greenland was MUCH warmer just 450,000 years ago?!!!

I had no idea Dr. Cullen was THAT old, she only looks to be in her early thirties to me!

We KNOW what she says is not true because of the mini ice ages and mini heat waves that have been documented over the years.

In the 1600's they made wine in Britain, now it's too cold to do so.

But once again I say it's NOT about the facts, it's about a belief. A belief that man is evil and is destroying the earth.

It's interesting that the same secularists who claim right wing Christians are out of their minds because they believe in Jesus Christ are the same ones who now believe in the Religion of Environmentalism because that's where their beliefs lie.

Dr. Cullen has also said that other meteorologists who disagree with Global Warming should be FIRED!

That's the way we should act, let's just close down the debate since she and the Reverend Gore have given us the final word.

Grist Magazine's staff writer David Roberts called for the Nuremberg style trials for the “bastards” who were members of what he termed the global warming “denial industry.”

Robert's wrote in the online publication on September 19, 2006, "When we've finally gotten serious about global warming, when the impacts are really hitting us and we're in a full worldwide scramble to minimize the damage, we should have war crimes trials for these bastards -- some sort of climate Nuremberg."

So now if we don't believe in Global Warming we should be considered on the par of the Nazis?!!!

He should keep in mind that it was actually it was the Nazi's who shut down open debate, JUST like Al Gore and his buddies want to do about this issue.

What about all the environmentalists who forced us to stop using CFC's to help restore the hole in the Ozone Layer.  CFC's were removed from EVERY spray can by governmental laws, and the freon had to be reformulated in EVERY vehicle, EVERY refrigerator, and EVERY air conditioning unit at great expense to EVERYONE who lives in modern society.

But now the entire science behind ozone depletion is being questioned after 20 years of this environmental scare.  Markus Rex, an atmospheric scientist at the Alfred Wegener Institute of Polar and Marine Research in Potsdam, Germany, says "If the measurements are correct we can basically no longer say we understand how ozone holes come into being. What effect the results have on projections of the speed or extent of ozone depletion remains unclear."

So we made all these drastic changes and the "science" behind this scare was unfounded.
It's just more envirowackism gone amuck.

Take a look at the book "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism)", by Christopher C. Horner. For decades, environmentalism has been the Left's best excuse for increasing government control over our actions in ways both large and small. "It's for Mother Earth!" "It's for the CHILDREN!" It's for the whales, and the polar bears, and the cute little penguins!  But until now, the doomsday scenario environmental scares they've trumped up haven't been large enough to justify the lifestyle restrictions they want to impose.

But under the moniker of "Global Warming" or now the new buzz word, "Climate Change" greenhouse gasbags can now argue that auto emissions in Ohio threaten people in Paris, and that only "global governance" (Jacques Chirac's words) can tackle such problems. 

Now, in The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism, Christopher C. Horner tears the cover off the Left's manipulation of environmental issues for political purposes and lays out incontrovertible evidence for the fact that catastrophic man-made global warming is just
Chicken-Little hysteria, NOT actual science.

He explains why Al Gore and his cronies among the media elite's and the United Nations globalists endlessly claim that "Global Warming" is an unprecedented global crisis, they really think of it as a dream come true. It's the ideal scare campaign for those who hate capitalism and love big government. 

For, as Horner explains, if global warming really were as bad as the Leftist doomsayers insist that it is, then NO policy imaginable could "solve" it. 

That makes Global Warming the bottomless well of excuses for the relentless growth of big government . . . just perfect for High Taxing Liberals!

Al Gore's Earth Pledge Al Gore wants us all to sign a pledge to help "save" the Earth.  I'm NEVER going to sign it, and I am going to oppose it as much as possible. Al Gore's idiotic pledge is in the green text and my SANE and responsible answers are in the yellow text.

1. To demand that my country join an international treaty within the next 2 years that cuts global warming pollution by 90% in developed countries and by more than half worldwide in time for the next generation to inherit a healthy earth.

Bullshit! 

You STILL haven't proven that CO2 causes global warming, and you won't even listen to the other side of the story that is supported by thousands of scientists. Enter into a SENSIBLE and FAIR debate and stop using your scare propaganda to warp peoples minds, especially our children.

I'm not going to destroy the Unites States economy, or the worlds economy, and hurt the poorest people of the world, just for your unproven theory and the fact that you have not thought about ALL the consequences your "solutions" have created.  There is NO POSSIBLE WAY to reduce Co2 production by 90% no matter what we do. 

FACT: Al Gore says that mankind puts 70 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every day. What he doesn't tell you is that mother nature puts 24,000 TIMES that amount of our main greenhouse gas -- water vapor -- into the atmosphere every day. 
Source: Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville, former NASA scientist,

2. To take personal action to help solve the climate crisis by reducing my own CO2 pollution as much as I can and offsetting the rest to become "carbon neutral;"

There is no such thing as "Carbon Neutral" so please stop bullshitting us.  It's just a money making scheme and a way for those using more energy than others to make themselves feel like they are doing something to help the environment when in truth they are doing NOTHING that will make ANY difference whatsoever. 

You're not "Carbon Neutral" Mr. Gore, you're "Carbon Retarded"!  Actually you're a pretty smart man. You're making MILLIONS by peddling your BULLSHIT to the world by giving paid speeches and selling people useless "Carbon Credits"!

3. To fight for a moratorium on the construction of any new generating facility that burns coal without the capacity to safely trap and store the CO2;

Then let us drill for oil in the United States, let us build NON POLLUTING nuclear power plants that will not damage the environment.

4. To work for a dramatic increase in the energy efficiency of my home, workplace, school, place of worship, and means of transportation;

I don't purposely waste energy, and I'm not going to dramatically alter my lifestyle just because you tell me to.  I'm going to drive the type of car that I want to, and I'm not going to ferry others around in it to carpool. YOU can do that in your private jet!!! 

Hey, Reverend Gore, why don't you practice what you preach and stop taking privates jets and wasting all that fuel and creating more pollution and fly commercial like I do!

5. To fight for laws and policies that expand the use of renewable energy sources and reduce dependence on oil and coal.

That's ALWAYS the Liberal solution, MORE laws!  Trees are renewable but you won't even let us cut down the dead ones to prevent forest fires where we loose ALL the trees!

Let us build nuclear power plants. Then we can run powerful electric cars on them and not these stupid little hybrids, and those tiny unsafe tin cans of death that only have a 50 horsepower engine in them.  Tesla Motors ( http://www.teslamotors.com ) is offering a REAL electric car that doesn't pollute at all, except for the electricity that must be made to power them.

Let us build more Nuclear power plants and these cars will be TOTALLY non polluting.

Why can't you people figure this out on your own?

Nuclear power is the safest, most non polluting form of energy we have.  Stop opposing it.

6. To plant new trees and to join with others in preserving and protecting forests.

I have enough trees on my property thank you very much.  By the way, stay off MY property with your Liberal bullshit laws. The logging companies already plant MORE trees every year than they harvest.  They know they have to do this to continue to use trees for lumber.

YOU'RE the ones telling us to use Ethanol which is destroying forests!

YOU people need us let us cut down overgrown trees, a natural renewable resource, and thin forests so that we don't loose ENTIRE forests as in what happened in the California and Lake Tahoe wildfires. 

Environmentalists sued and protested that trees should not be cut down in California. 
That's a nice Earth saving thought. But what happened? 

The forests got overgrown, dried out and caught fire. Thousands of people lost their homes because of these fires and thousands and thousands of acres of land ended up TREELESS because they ALL burned down!  YOUR solution left us with NO TREES instead of a sensibly managed forest.

In New Orleans the envirowackos sued the Army Corps of Engineers and successfully prevented them from making the levee's stronger before Hurricane Katrina. They wanted to help save the wetlands.  Well, they did that, the levee's broke and now ALL of New Orleans is wetlands!

Instead of letting us cut down even dead trees to save the forests, we lose entire forests and people's homes and even lives because of the increased fire hazard that YOU PEOPLE created by your nonsensical, idiotic, SELFISH rules. 

YOU'RE making environmental problems WORSE because of your Envirowacko, extremist stupidity.

7. To buy from businesses and support leaders who share my commitment to solving the climate crisis and building a sustainable, just, and prosperous world for the 21st century.

I'll buy what I want, when I want it, from where I want.  If I want a Hummer I'll buy one.
If fact I will NOT buy anything from any corporation that panders to your false religion of Global Warming.
I will NOT support politicians who buy into this global warming nonsense and the inane solutions you propose.

I love the fact that U2 frontman and singer Bono pokes fun at Al Gore's religion of Global Warming.
At a January 2008 conference in Davos, Switzerland, where Bono was making a case for the starving, aids infected children of Africa, Al Gore was wasting everybody's time by peddling his meaningless religion.

Bono said:  It's not even a professorial thing, as has been cited.  He's more as a rabbinical. Or like an Irish priest, you confess your sins.  "Father Al, I am not just a noise polluter, I am a noise-polluting, diesel-sucking, methane-emitting, gulfstream-flying rock star."  "And what are you going to do about it son? Are you going to kick the habit?"  "I'm trying Father Al, but to be honest with you, oil has been very good for me. It's been very good for me. It's been very good to me.  Those convoys of articulated lorries, petrochemical products, hair gel!" Click Here to hear Bono poke fun at "Father" Al Gore!

Bono actually does things to affect real world change, such as raising money for Africa's poor, and making the world more aware that the developing world needs not only money and food, but for employment and trade, (Capitalism & Freedom) to help bring them out of poverty, starvation, and slavery.  He also attacks religious extremism and supports the war against terror. Click Here to see Bono bring real change to Africa through Capitalism.